187 points

FYI Texas has been marked as a “do not travel” state on Erin Reed’s trans risk map: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/final-pre-election-2024-anti-trans

permalink
report
reply
44 points

I think that was inevitable unfortunately…

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

I’m in one of the worst states, I’m scared about where things are going …

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I go through Oklahoma just to skip Texas when driving cross country. Oklahoma is preferable to Texas. Yeesh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I have a trans teenage cousin in Texas. We’re not close, but I worry. All I can really do is let him and his mom know I exist in a “safe” state and hope they reach out if they decide to leave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Fuck, I didn’t realize we have a green* book

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I live in TX and see lots of trans people living their lives. It’s a much more purple area though, but we still have a lot of crazies

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yes, lots of trans people live in Texas and Florida, that’s exactly what is terrifying about these laws - there are real victims.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Oh, last time I saw only Florida had that dubious distinction. They’ve been busy. It’s infuriating what a shithole a large portion of this country has become.

permalink
report
parent
reply
155 points
*

Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.

Even if they use the “right” restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground

Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. The point of laws like this isn’t to protect cis women and girls, it’s just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that’s all Republicans care about.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Also there is evidence that it is harmful to cis people. Especially cis women who might be queer or straight or gender nonconforming or not. These fuckwads always forget trans men exist and just harass women more with this shit. They don’t give a fuck off you’re trans or not, it’s about control. And their especially interested in controlling women.

It’s also directly tied to fascism. Eco points to Machismo in point 12 of Ur-Fascism. “[Fascists hold] both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.” Meaning it’s not just women, trans women, gay men, people outside of traditional 1940s gender roles, but it also includes straight, cis men who just don’t seem to be straight and cis enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

harmful to trans people.

And there’s the true intent of the Republican legislators.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

What, we’re supposed to let them use the restroom that matches their identity just because it’s the moral right thing to do, costs us nothing, and the alternative harms everyone!? Sounds like someone is WOKE!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

Can confirm: Having shared many a bathroom with trans folks and I have managed to survive unharmed. Who would have thunk?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I was once in a public bathroom. Just when i was about to wash my hands, a women walked in. I was shocked, i looked around and saw that there were urinals, so the lady was in the wrong bathroom, not me. We laughed and then we both left. That was i close one, i tell you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Can confirm: have no idea if I’ve ever shared a bathroom with a trans person because I am there to go to the bathroom, not interact with strangers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points
*

Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.

You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.

We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that’s an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don’t let this bullshit dim your shine.

I love each and every one of you.

permalink
report
reply
73 points

Pop Quiz:

Which bathroom should he use?

permalink
report
reply
54 points

As long as it’s not my stall, I don’t care

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

He can use mine

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Pssshhhhh!!! Look at this bourgeoisie mother fucker over here, refusing to share their stall with others!

Selfish. Yes, that’s the word!

The common working man poops on the left half of the toilet, and a stranger from the streets poop on the right half! AND THEY BOTH HATE THE YANKEES!!!

Because fuck the Yankees. Can’t believe I have to cheer for the god damn Dodgers …

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Whichever he want to use. Period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Just like everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s OBVIOUSLY a Woman and should use my Daughter’s Bathroom!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’ve done things like this when people do the ‘trans women make “real” women feel uncomfortable in locker rooms’ argument.

“So you’re saying women would be more comfortable with that guy changing next to them?”

They don’t really have an argument against that part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“Oh, she’s just a tomboy, the phase will pass.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The one with the toilet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m gonna need to see his tits first. Duh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Depends on the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

too many taps to get to rejecting cookies so I’ll save you the click: Odessa, Texas is the city

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I was about to ask, what’s with the privacy policy of that site? How can a website that focuses on an oppressed minority be so shitty about their personal data?

I’m not telling your community what to do, but this seems very unsafe und unwise to use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Loads fine on tor browser with JavaScript disabled and no modals

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 198K

    Comments