Donald Trump continues to suck up to the Russian president.

If Ukraine were to suddenly surrender to Russia, everything would be “much better,” at least according to Donald Trump.

During an afternoon press conference Wednesday, the Republican presidential nominee urged the Eastern European nation to submit to the foreign power, claiming that any deal, no matter how dismal for Ukraine’s freedom, would have been better than the current state of affairs.

“Ukraine is gone. It’s not Ukraine anymore. You can never replace those cities and towns, and you can never replace the dead people, so many dead people,” Trump said. “Any deal, even the worst deal, would have been better than what we have right now.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

-25 points

Harris suggests giving Israel whatever they want. But, one is far more effective at killing innocents than the other.

Giant douche or turd sandwich? I’ll endorse neither.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

And you’ll get the worse one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

So you’ll happily vote for Trump if he’s running against someone worse? I feel like eventually you have to draw a line somewhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Honestly it’s not a bad point, but it’s also not reflective or a great comparison since it’s not really grounded in reality. I’d vote for the person not willing “fix” america in favour of white supremacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

It’s not worse for me as a brown individual. That damage is already done.

It’s worse for MLK’s white moderates because they can’t ignore the issues the rest of us have been suffering our whole lives.

I’ll choose justice over order and principle over comfort. It’s the only way forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Fair and That’s probably what will be happening. Many of us are probably not coming out the otherside in that case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I feel like you’re implying that being made aware of injustice is a worse position to be in than actually suffering from those same injustices, and that has to be the stupidest thing I’ve read in a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Where exactly did she do that. Source…

That sounds like a Facebook statement where eople like you just keep coming up with increasingly absurd comments until you forget what the truth is (like those anti EV people on Facebook who have somehow convinced themselves that petrol is cleaner and EVs constantly blow up, because they just keep upping their own comments).

So I’d really like a source on that one

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Alternate headline: Trump Neville Chamberlain suggests giving Vladimir Putin Adolf Hitler whatever he wants

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Comparing Trump to Chamberlain is a pretty big disservice to Chamberlain. History at least shows that Chamberlain was correct about Britain’s ability to combat German aggression, and his appeasement bought Britain the time to properly arm and ready themselves for war.

Trump’s just a sniveling sycophant who wants to give Daddy Putin everything he wants because he hopes Putin will be proud of him and treat him as a big man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I could have sworn at one point Russia claimed to have annexed certain parts of Ukraine due to ethnic Russians, very similar to Hitlers Sudetenland claims.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Central Ukraine suppressing russian language\culture in Donbas, Luhansk and Crimea were their talking points right before 2014.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No - Chamberlain bought us time to stand up to him. But only just. Trump is just a whining lapdog.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points
*

Appeasement doesn’t work. Appeasement never works. It didn’t work with Hitler and it won’t work with Put-ler. This piece of shit is a useful idiot and I’m saddened that quite a few people today lap this shit up and see this as the best path forward. Ukraine may be scarred now but they can and will rebuild when they win this war. Slava Ukraini

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Appeasement can work, just not in the obvious way. It’s like throwing steaks at a pack of hungry wolves. It won’t slow them for long, but it might give you enough time to find the shells, and load the shotgun.

What Trump is doing doesn’t even rise to the level of appeasement. He’s just begging like a whipped dog to his master.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

To be clear, even if it was appeasement, it still would accomplish nothing since the US does not need to buy time to build up their military.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Ehhh, recruitment levels have been plummeting. I’m not saying we couldn’t absolutely kick Russia’s shit in with what we currently have, and take out half of Iran’s Navy again, while we are at it for shits and giggles. We could have some issues if WWIII were to happen, at least for a couple of months for the draft to catch up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s a damn good analogy. Appease for long enough to grab a big stick. My original thought on Dementia Don saying just “give Putin what he wants” felt to me like a “if we do this now he won’t ask for more later and the war will stop” kinda thing. As I read it now I’m willing to bet you’re more correct. There is no nuance here. The orange cheeto is angling for praise from his master and dictators the world over. How fucking dumb

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Appease for long enough to grab a big stick.

Neville Chamberlain got a bad rap from history for doing exactly this. He gave Hitler bits of what he wanted while making sure Britain had enough modern fighters (Hurricanes and Spitfires) to fend off the Luftwaffe when war inevitably did break out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

a useful idiot

Useful idiot has specific meaning. It is someone who is so dumb that you can convince him to betray his country for free and he does believe he is doing right thing.

I am pretty sure this piece of shit is getting paid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh there’s definitely kompromat on him. He’s done terrible things to children on video I’m sure. He owes dark money to dangerous people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You don’t need to subscribe to wild theories to understand this.

He was listed in the Epstein flight logs seven times.

He built condos for Russian oligarchs to launder money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Interesting. I learned something new today. Thanks for sharing! And no doubt he’s been bought/getting paid. Everything about him screams Russian asset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
229 points

Trumps plan to “solve russias war against ukraine” is to “give up”.

Is this the man you want leading your country?

Imagine FDR “solving ww2” by surrendering to japan and the nazis

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

No need to imagine when we have history to reference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Chamberlain

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

To his credit, Chamberlain wasn’t as bad as he’s made out. When he implemented his policy of appeasement, Britain was not actually capable of meaningfully resisting nazi Germany. He basically brought time to bring Britain back to a war footing. When it became obvious to the public that war was coming, he fell on his sword. This cleared the way for Churchill to take charge, without significant infighting. He also inherited Britain on a far better war footing, and even then it was a close thing.

Basically, Chamberlain knew his plan wouldn’t work long term. He took one “for king and country”, likely knowing how it would be perceived. I can at least respect him for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’m not arguing it was or wasn’t right for Britain position at the time. Just making the point we know, from direct history, a policy of appeasement does nothing to stop further advancement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“how do you remove your hand from a lion’s mouth?”

“very carefully.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

This was his strategy in Afghanistan too!

Arguably that was always going to end with a Taliban takeover, but we could’ve done that without giving them a leg up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points

If only we’d continued our brutal occupation of Afghanistan another 20 years, maybe the regime would’ve lasted another two weeks after we left.

Y’all are completely hopeless, enjoy your forever wars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Are people like this just incapable of grasping nuance? I can only definitively speak for myself, but I’m pretty sure nobody here wants forever wars (maybe there are some dumb tankies that think they want it)

We all wanted out of Afghanistan, we just would prefer to have, you know, an actual plan.

But you know that already, don’t you? Or are you actually that ignorant?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No, we should’ve left shortly after killing Bin Laden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

“Don’t worry, men—I have a plan.”

“TAKE WHATEVER YOU WANT!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

The Shart of the Deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

🤌

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

That’s not even a “concept of a plan”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Well, concepts of a plan

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If Chamberlain can give up Czeckoslovakia for “peace for our time”, and be remembered as a great man (or at least as a garage door opener) surely Trump can be remembered for all time by giving up Eastern Europe for profit for his time

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ah. Another sterling strategy from Donald “Neville” Trump.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.6K

    Posts

  • 135K

    Comments