152 points

It’s reassuring if true, but Newsweek are a right-wing disinformation source. Perhaps they’re reporting this straight, or perhaps this is disinformation aimed at a specific goal. In any case, nothing from them should be taken at face value unless verified from a reputable source.

permalink
report
reply
58 points

Huh, I had assumed Newsweek was mostly left, but it looks like you’re correct:

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

I haven’t read it in over a decade though…

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsweek/

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

FWIW, I had a subscription over a decade ago. I can’t say I ever thought of it as “Left”, it was at best, corporate center. But it definitely has gone more right as it has also gone more sensationalist. They partnered with Daily Beast for a while, and then were sold to IBT media, an international “news and Information” conglomerate. I think your memories are from the old hard journalism days, and they have gone back to corporate, but corporate-right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I could have sworn previously that maggot chuds used to call it NewsWeak. Guess new ownership had different plans

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah I member when newsweek would find an excuse to put Jesus’ face on the cover ever other week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Isn’t all corporate, right or center? This is maybe a me problem but I think of the Democrats as a center right party because of their policies regarding corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can assume a right-center bias for almost any outlet, and I think mediabiasfactcheck needs to recalibrate, if we are being honest. See their assessment of NYT, as a for instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wow, yeah. I thought Newsweek was a staunchly centrist organization.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not shilling for them but I like ground news for the bias ratings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

It is disinformation. The data from the poll they are referencing was mostly completed before the assassination attempt: https://pro.morningconsult.com/trackers/2024-presidential-election-polling (Archive Link)

The latest data was collected Friday through Sunday, meaning most responses were gathered before Saturday’s assassination attempt on Trump at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m guessing it’s too early for polls to actually tell. It comes around the same time as the RNC, so even if his numbers go up, it may be hard to tell what is responsible

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

Be sure to vote as if polls don’t exists.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Im voting for not trump. Hopefully at some my in my lifetime my vote will actually count.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I hope that happens as well. But for now, we have to stop the bleeding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nope. Your vote always counts. It may not feel like it counts much, it’s one vote, but it will absolutely count. We have to stop this rhetoric of “my vote doesn’t count” because it’s how people justify not voting at all.

Especially from the “not trump” side of things, voter turnout is the only thing that stops them from winning. If you can give right/republicans one thing they have consistent voter turnout, but every single time overall voter counts are boosted (Like during Obama’s initial election) the needle of results sways strongly towards Democrats/independents.

So please, please stop saying your vote doesn’t count. Because even if it’s a single vote it is SO important that you go and do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Electoral college is what counts. If California was a battleground state, then yes, my vote counts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Very good advice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

You mean the media and pundits were wrong? Shocker.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

We need to worry about motivation, not polls. Very few people will change their minds about the candidates, but many of them will change their minds about voting. Some percentage of likely voters will always stay home. That percentage is going to be much lower for people whose candidate survived an assassination attempt.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Because literally, more than half the country wishes he didn’t miss.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

And exactly half of Tenacious D, apparently

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Wait, what?

Edit: disregard, I was behind on the news apparently

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Rage Kage said something dumb about it and now Jaybles doesn’t want to work with him anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

On record. Off record, we all know he feels about the racist rapist with 34 felonies that wants to be a dictator and end democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 190K

    Comments