The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

-3 points
*

This isn’t as easy as it seems. Apparently it’s not uncommon to register to vote in a closed primary like PA for the opposite party you prefer in order to dilute the vote for the candidate you don’t like by voting for the person running against them in the party. So he may be a “registered republican voter”, but that may be as a minor act of sabotage rather than his real politics.

E: what’s up with the rebuttals? “Yeah it happens but not really”? So it happens, but it couldn’t with this guy? If I’m wrong and he’s actually a Republican, great! But downvoting the possibility he registered the opposite of his beliefs isn’t gonna make it disappear.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Apparently it’s not uncommon

You know what’s incredibly more common? Being an actual Republican and voting in a Republican Primary.

Everyone loves a harmless conspiracy theory, but this theory is anything but. Unless the shooter specifically admitted to this conspiracy theory, peddling this bullshit is reckless. About as stupid as child molesters in pizza place basements that don’t exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is it even more common to being a republican and assassinating the leader of the party? He “said” he was republican, but the shooting at republicans say otherwise. And i trust actions more than words. And the actions don’t get any more louder than that. Besides it does not matter one iota what Party he is affiliated with. The only thing that matters is the disappointment that he missed

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The dislike for Trump crosses party affiliation and traditional right/left dichotomies. That is to say that there are A LOT of Republicans that dislike Trump and don’t see him as an ally, or see him as quite the opposite, in fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’d point you to the assassin of John Lennon - he is/was a big Beatles fan but murdered John anyway because of who John became. That still doesn’t have anything to do with the parallel argument, in this case, of the likelihood that Mark was pretending to be a Beatles fan or not.

Actions do speak louder than words - this would-be assassin registered as a Republican. The conspiracy theory that he was trying to affect a Primary makes no sense based on timing alone, let alone there not being an iota of evidence indicating he wasn’t a Republican. Republicans created the environment for this kid to do what he attempted to do and they should own up to their culpability rather than rely on bots and useful idiots to blame everyone but themselves for this problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That is almost entirely a myth. Yes, there are ‘cross over votes’ in states that don’t have open primaries but facilitate party enrollment, but those cross over voters are almost always ‘independent’ voters who enroll and then unenroll and are not doing anything other than voting for the candidate of their choice in the primary that candidate is running in. So called ‘strategic voting’, as far as I know, has never made any difference in any presidential primary, but go ahead and bring up the bodies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s not for presidential races.

Its for state level races where you’re in one of the 40+ states where it’s a forgone conclusion what party wins the general.

So some people give up their presidential primary vote, to vote in the state level primaries for the party virtually guaranteed to win their state, then vote for their preferred party in the general even if their candidate won the primary for the other party

You might not think it’s common, but it’s the only way a lot of people’s votes have any actual effect, so lots of people do it

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Indeed. Party affiliation only indicates which party’s primary you wanted to participate in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I would agree with the theory (as I’ve personally witnessed people registering for opposing party to wreck havoc there internally), BUT: I rarely came across hardcore gun-loving Democrat, watching NRA-related content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The last two points are very valid. It’s definitely something I considered, but this is such an F’d up timeline that I can’t help but be very pessimistic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“When people tell you who they are, believe them.”

Also, Occam’s razor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just letting people know what a PA resident told me. Too bad people don’t want to hear it. If the guy was left leaning and registered as a Republican downvotes aren’t going to make it better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He would have had to think to do that 3 years ahead of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can you not change party affiliation at any time?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can but he didn’t. He set his affiliation 3 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

This definitely happens, though it’s not remotely as common as just voting for your preferred party in the primary.

A friend and I both voted Republican in a primary a couple years ago. The Democratic lineup wasn’t interesting and it was obvious who was going to win on it. Quite frankly our votes didn’t matter much there. But the GOP contenders were a mixed bag of semi-moderates and MAGA bootlickers. We felt it was most important to keep the Trumpy psychos out of the general election, so we voted against them.

In a way I think it was the right call at the time. On the other hand, I get a lot of SMS spam to my number now from scammy pro-Trump sources. Of course I report those to the FTC every time, but it’s still gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Some articles (like this one from USA Today have mentioned that in '21 he made a small donation to the Progressive Turnout Project, and it’s interesting that that’s missing from this article. Did it turn out to not be true or did they purposefully omit that?

I’m from Yurop so I don’t even pretend to understand the election system in the US let alone PA, but I’ve seen some comments that led me to understand that he could well be a Democrat even though he was a “registered Republican” because there might not even be good D candidates for him to vote for in PA, and many D voters tactically vote for the least bad R candidate.

Not sure him being a “gun lover” really necessarily paints him as a Republican either; Americans regardless of party affiliation can be pretty… uh, enthusiastic about guns, although yeah it does seem to be more common on the right but I’m not sure it’s enough to draw any conclusions from it.

And just so there’s no misunderstandings, I really don’t have a dog in this hunt so I’m not looking to blame Democrats for the shooting, I’m just trying to digest the news I’ve been reading.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Nothing here is controversial in the slightest, why the down votes?

And yes, there are plenty of liberal gun nuts, like me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It depends on the state (and their election laws) but some people register for the opposite primary to try and influence it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I definitely think it’s possible he could be either. The bit about guns is mainly because guns is one of their things. Some Republicans love guns more than anything.

Either way, I’m mostly impressed at how quickly those facts became the most important bits of information. I guess it makes sense though. I’m just glad he’s white and not brown. lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

The Republican party registration has other corroborating information listed such as middle initial address and date of birth.

The donation only has the same first and last name.

So they’re including the Republican party registration, as it’s more confirmed… And they’re not saying he voted Republican, just that he was registered that way.

As for having an interest in guns, he owned an AR-15, so must have had some interest there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He was wearing a T-shirt from the merch store of the “Demolition Ranch” YouTube channel (huge gun channel) when he did this so yeah definitely

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

As for having an interest in guns, he owned an AR-15, so must have had some interest there.

He was wearing a Demolition Ranch Tshirt. It’s a popular YouTube gun channel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

NY Times article interviewed a classmate who indicated he had right leaning views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Some articles (like this one from USA Today have mentioned that in '21 he made a small donation to the Progressive Turnout Project, and it’s interesting that that’s missing from this article. Did it turn out to not be true or did they purposefully omit that?

It was a donation to a get out the vote project. On inauguration day. About as useful as tits on a tractor.

I don’t know if he made the donation to make it seem like he was a Democrat or for no good reason, but he didn’t donate $15 on January 20th to help Democratic turnout.

They probably left it out because getting into it would only muddy the waters or even lend false credence to the cult’s conspiracy theories about him being “deep state antifa” or whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The donation is not confirmed to be him. The listed donation just came with a first and last name. No age or birth date, with no middle initial or name. There are a lot of people with the same first and last name and there’s no reason to believe it was this particular Thomas Crooks that made the donation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

The address on the Act Blue donation is also listed as Pittsburgh, not Bethel Park.

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Turns out that was a different person with the same name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

How did they identify him using DNA? That’s a fucking red flag. Is there some database I’m not aware of? Or did he have prior arrests?

permalink
report
reply
58 points
*

There are genealogy databases that are public and or cooperate with authorities. Perhaps I’m a privacy nihilist, but IMHO, the cat’s kind of out of the bag for a lot of this. If you didn’t submit your DNA to a genealogy DB, you probably have family members that did so could see if they were 30% Italian or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yes all these rocks and minerals need to be watched closely

Lol

I think you mean genealogy maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah. Autocorrect

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It was the only reliable way to find who the biological parents of my father were, so yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It was the only way I could find out if my biological father was 30% Italian so I’m with you

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

That’s how they caught the golden state killer. I think it was his niece submitted a DNA sample and it popped up as related to the unknown sample they had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I once read an expert on this and it seems they only need a very low amount of DNA samples (like 0.1% of the population) in the database to be able to narrow down any search to the sibling level.

And traditional detective work can then figure out which sibling, if there are multiple.

So yeah, the cat is out of the bag with this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly, your DNA doesn’t need to be in the DB at all, you just your relatives DNA in the DB.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Why is it a red flag

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

When you’re rooting for a conspiracy all new info cam be read as a red flag if you’re creative and paranoid enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

LET ME SEE HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Because it’s potentially indicative of a national database of everyone’s DNA, rather than just the criminal database, which would be (and perhaps is) a privacy nightmare

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Some states have been collecting blood for almost 40 years and can’t even really say why. They just started doing it…

https://www.ibj.com/articles/58596-storing-babies-blood-samples-pits-privacy-versus-science

Like, they have an excuse for taking the samples that seems valid. Except I don’t think they’re actually testing them. And there’s no reason to keep after testing.

Now, I dont think it’s for a secret DNA database, I think it’s normal red state bullshit.

Just pointing out in some states the take and keep blood samples from every birth

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

some large commercial dna testing companies share their databases with law enforcement, and additionally you really don’t need a close match to start identifying someone, 5th cousin type thing etc. heres an good video on the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not. Law enforcement can get a warrant on 23 & Me. Everyone turning over the DNA to random companies not required to comply with HIPAA is a terrible idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Privacy minded people don’t like the idea of easily accessible geology databases. This was a good use of that technology, but people worry about that technology be used for evil. Health insurance companies reflagging you, or much worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Did you mean *biology?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
1 point

I didn’t realize how sketchy that all was. The form mentions genetic testing for conditions, but that was just like 2 of the spots. They did like 6 to a tiny newborn. I’d recommend other parents to object.

And I’m going to submit the destruction forms for my kids and myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They could easily get samples from family members to confirm. I’m sure one or both of his parents were in discussions with the FBI shortly after this all went down

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah this seems obvious to me. “Can we swab your cheek to confirm if this is your son?” What parent wouldn’t want to know if their kid was dead or alive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

These days, you can opt in having your child’s dna stored after birth, in case they go missing or a natural disaster or something. We did it, but we opted to keep it physically in our own possession. It’s a little vial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

he didn’t have a criminal record according to the article, but if DNA records existed for his parents, you could still identify someone as offspring with pretty high confidence based on that IIRC

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Some organizations do mass DNA collection from kids to help identify them later in life.

The school sends out a notification that the parents can sign up to have their kid swabbed so their kid’s tiny corpse can be identified. They don’t word it like that, but that is the idea.

So he may have been swabbed as a kid and they referenced that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Poor bastard. At 20, mental capacity is nowhere near its peak, and how bad must your life be if you are willing to throw it away for some obese self-tanning cream using orange dipshit? This is what happens when mental illnesses aren’t taken serious, and treatment is not easily available.

permalink
report
reply
91 points

Well, let’s see

Looks at everything on fire around us

Yeah I have no clue what could have caused his life to be bad enough to do something like that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think you misunderstood. I wasn’t saying I don’t see how people could have mental problems in this world. That was a rhetorical question, observing that the poor bastard was obviously very broken / brainwashed / ill / whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Right…the problem is the very troubled young man, not the fact that he had easy access to firearms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

You’ve managed to identify the highly effective, yet morally reprehensible strategy for military recruitment. Get young men when they are at peak testosterone, but have limited pre-frontal cortex development.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He doesn’t have to be exploited by his boss or landed lord anymore.

Peace someday. Hope yall find yours in this life not the next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

There is so much that is unknown. Everything about his true motives will, likely, be speculation forever. But it’s best to let the FBI be the one that does the information reveal.

This kid was 20 though. He might have had psychosis. Last presidential assassination attempt was Hinkley. This is around the age things like schizophrenia start to present themselves IIRC. This might have been a suicide by cop type situation and he wanted to be famous in the process? Who the hell knows.

What if we had a law that you had to be 21 to buy guns though? That’s in line with “common sense” gun control. I’ve heard Obama say that phrase countless times since Sandy Hook. It could have made this a little different, maybe? It almost certainly would have prevented Uvalde. This is political violence, it’s horrible, I think this will help Trump win. Any left leaning person with half a brain can see that imo. This is also gun violence though. Gun control has to part of the answer to this. Remember who the Brady Bill was named after.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The gun wasn’t his. He stole it from his dad. In a country with more guns than people it’s simply impossible to disarm the bad guys.

Instead maybe we should tackle things like mental illness, lack of critical thinking skills, cognitive dissonance, and the destruction of family values. Also people should have to go through training and be licensed to be allowed on the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Apparently the shooter didn’t have any social media accounts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What a psycho posts from lemmy, my only social account

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Why not both? Tackle guns with more control and better mental health care and education.

Disarming bad guys shouldn’t be the goal. Much like smoking in the UK. You wont stop all the older generationa from smoking but you can make it illegal for all the younger generations and over a longer peeiod of time theres no kne left that smokes.

If you tackle guns now and provide greater control over ownership whilst simultaneously educating younger people you will effectively prevent this sort of crim in the future.

At least thats my view.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

False dichotomy.

Every other country the world over is trying to reduce the number of guns around and improve mental health.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I understand the sentiment but I’d be a fan of having an adult age across the board.

If you can be drafted, you should be able to drink, buy guns, rent cars, vote, etc. That should all be at the same age, whatever that age is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Couldn’t agree more. Let’s make the adult age a nice even 20 and call it a day.

(Or ideally 25 if you want to be more realistic about it, given the rate that people mature at, but I have a feeling that would be extremely unpopular.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think 25 is far too old. We already have a problem of not letting teenagers learn to become an adult. Yes you’re going to make stupid decisions in your early 20s, you’re better off making a variety of stupid decisions while you’re still maturing rather than waiting until you’ve finished before taking actions that have consequences.

Also imagine being a 24 year old who either is expected to live with your parents or get an adult to cosign your lease. Or can’t vote. Or can’t decide to have certain medical procedures like an abortion without parental permission. We’ve become far too comfortable with the idea we need to legally disenfranchise young people further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So would someone over 25 dating someone younger than 25 be legislated?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ya the military would go bonkers

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, and I generally think it should be 18. Some rights should come sooner such as medical autonomy and Romeo and Juliet style consent, but once you hit the age of adulthood you’re legally an adult

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You can legally rent a car at 18, it’s just that no company wants to rent to you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And be president. How about 35 for the adulthood age?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hell yeah, and very strong anti-child-labor laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mean why stop there? I say 65, no, 95 should be the age everyone is considered an adult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But it’s best to let the FBI be the one that does the information reveal.

Sirhan Sirhan would vehemently disagree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

By all reports, his father bought the gun. While I agree with them, your suggestions would have done literally nothing in this situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It was reported that the weapon was his father’s.

Sometimes not even a safe will keep everything locked up. With enough time you can saw through most of the commercially available ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There are insurance/registration issues that can address that. Of course there endless possible hypotheticals. I’m personally in favor of some sort of “drivers license” equivalent for guns.

But a 21 year old age limit almost certainly would have prevented Uvalde.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

disagree. if people want to do something, terrible or not, they will find a way illegally.

I’m going to go very basic here and say look at piracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I am highly skeptical of registration because there is a 99.99% certainty that it will be the GOP to use it and strip away weapons from anyone who is not a registered Republican.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Do we know in this case whether or not the gun was even kept in a safe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

With enough time you can saw through most of the commercially available ones.

This is technically true but with the amount of time and effort it takes to get through a good portion of the safes I’ve seen, it would honestly be easier to go and steal one from some schmuck with a truck gun or whatever that’s insecurely, uhhh, secured.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This kid was 20 though. He might have had psychosis. Last presidential assassination attempt was Hinkley. This is around the age things like schizophrenia start to present themselves IIRC.

This is highly true and not something I’ve seen anyone bring up until now. It’s a good point and I think it actually might be pretty likely. Good job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Last presidential assassination attempt was Hinkley.

That may just be the last one you were aware of, there have been a number of attempts since, several involving guns being fired at the president (or fired at a position the shooter thought he was)

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Dudes just ignoring the shoes thrown at Bush

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Props to the guy for getting shoe #2 off even if W did dodge

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Valid, I’m sure. Hinkley was the last that made anytype of major news, unless I’m mistaken.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments