30 points

Proving Netflix could be replaced by five hard working people.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

The only reason all companies prices go up these days is for CEO pay packages

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Like Boeing’s CEO making 300 million… imagine 300 people who worked their ass off could make million. Or 1500 hard workers could be making 200k. But nah, let’s just drag these huge bags of money into this one asshole’s account. Oh there were a couple of crashes right? 👍 Our thoughts and prayers 🙏. But not our money wagons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

but wait… there’s more
astronauts

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think it’s more for major shareholders (which includes CEOs, of course)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Its almost like its unecessary shit made up in order to keep profits away from working people artificially

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s true that Hollywood is corrupt and csuite pay is absurd, but those deals are the only mechanism by which ANY money makes it to the writers, actors and staff who deserve it

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah its almost like if we didn’t keep extending copyright protections a bunch of stuff would be in the public domain and any streaming service could offer it without having to deal with licensing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or fund new content

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Their scale was also an insignificant fraction of what Netflix has, making the point even more irrelevant.

The best figure I could find on Jetflicks user count was 37k, where as Netflix has 269 million users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Prices should go down with scale not up though.

There’s initial investment on the initial servers (and the software), and afterwards it should be a linear increase of server costs per user, with some bumps along the way to interconnect those servers.

The cost also scales per content. Because that means more caching servers per user and bigger databases, and licenses.

So this service has less users and more content, it should be way more expensive. The only reason they are cheaper is because they don’t pay those licenses.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If we get rid of the licensing we get rid of the lawyers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If you get rid of licensing you get rid of the content

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Proving Netflix could be replaced outdone by five hard working people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Proving Netflix should could be replaced outdone by five hard working people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Proving Netflix should could be replaced outdone by five hard working people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Things are easier if you can steal stuff. And operate on a small scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Did they make the shows too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Does Netflix? Or do they pay production companies for content?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They use the subscription money to pay production studios. What did the pirate site use the subscription money for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Does Netflix make shows? Or does it slam its name onto filmmakers it pays to make content? If so, one of those things simply requires throwing cash at people, which I think is a skill that most people can learn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Did the pirate site pay anyone to make new shows?

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

“substantial harm to television program copyright owners,”

Give me a fucking break

permalink
report
reply

Those poor, poor, TV execs… They all had to settle for gold plating in their heated in-door pools and Rolls Royces instead of platinum. 😔

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Won’t somebody think of the television program copyright owners??

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think of them when I dream about them facing a firing squad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But then who would finance the production of television programs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Streaming services become required by law like insurance

Wait, why am I required to pay for a streaming service?

Because it has all of the entertainment electrolytes a human needs

permalink
report
reply
5 points

We already have the private copying levy in Germany and some other countries, where you have to pay a fee for several products (printers, scanners, storage media like HDDs, SSDs, SD cards and thumb drives…) due to the potential that you could do (legal!) private copies of copyrighted media on them. The copyright collectives can set the amount of the fees freely (and it’s ridiculously high).

This comes shockingly close to the concept already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I member the good old days when we were buying our blank CD/DVD in Germany to avoid paying those taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m not sure about other countries, but here in Czech we actually have a mandatory subscription, that’s absolutely bullshit.

So far, the law is that if you own any TV or radio, you have to pay monthly fee for public service broadcasters (national Czech TV). It’s bullshit, the channels are full of ads anyway, and the shows they run and create is insultingly bad. Sure, it is important to have public service broadcasters that are not dependent on the state (because state-owned TV is reeaallly bad idea), but FFS can they just reduce costs and stick to news, instead of doing another stupid series, and stop forcing us to pay for something I don’t care about or use?

You could just not pay the fee, if you state you don’t have a TV capable of receiving it (which I don’t). But now, they are changing the law that everyone who has any kind of internet-capable device has to pay the monthly fee, while also rising prices to something like 6 EUR per month. Fuck that and fuck them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Reminds me of the BBC licence fee in the UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah but with the beeb at least you got fawlty towers, blackadder, PYTHON!, red dwarf, fuck man, I’d pay the TV snoops for that stuff without much grumble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, I’ve got one of those too. Plex is great.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

ITT: Have you heard the good news about our lord and saviour, Jellyfin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lasted a week and went back to Plex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Jellyfin is a bitch to get working outside my network. I don’t get how Plex made it so easy

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

really? I never had an issue with just sticking it behind a reverse proxy, doing some port forwarding, and setting an apex domain record, that was it. curious what wasn’t working for you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m trying to switch to Jellyfin I really am. With Plex I could just throw a file bot at my files normalize the names and it was fine. I can’t mark things watched or unwatched from the Roku client. I’ve now tried three separate times to get the Doctor who specials to show up with names. Plex is by no means perfect but it’s so much easier to keep Plex goomed

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was fretting over Doctor Specials, season numbers, eras and naming a few weeks back. In fairness it has been running since black and white times so not too bad considering. Whats a filebot by the way and whats a good one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Plex is a privacy nightmare that’s slowly trying to faze out you having a server all together in favor of feeding you commercialized content from other providers; and many people find Jellyfin is far too unpolished/disorganized for a lot of debatable reasons I won’t go into.

I’ve been quite happy with the middle ground: Emby. It’s not FOSS, but is well polished with consistent development, great feature parity across platforms, excellent clients for pretty much every device I’d want to use, and a helpful community ready to assist with any problems you come across. They also have a heavy focus on privacy; with no third party partners collecting your info like Plex, and no telemetry sent from servers/clients.

The lifetime premier license I bought 7 years ago was well worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wasn’t Jellyfin developed using the Emby source code as a starting point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You know, I’ve heard this gospel before, I might still have the pamphlet…

Honestly, I haven’t really looked into jellyfin yet. I hear it’s superior in some way… But I already have Plex all set up and I have 4 friends with servers and we all share content. So it would take a lot for me to switch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It really isn’t superior. It’s just the hivemind that gets annoyed with Plex being stagnant, not open source etc. that claims it is. At best it has feature parity for some use-cases. Don’t get me wrong, it’s neat, but it’s not as polished as Plex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I always wonder why some people are so dedicated to Jellyfin. Even if JF had full feature and experience parity, it would still not have secure remote access the way Plex does. There is no need to port forward or NAT Plex for external access if you use app.plex.tv to access. With the threat landscape the way it is today, that is worth a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I haven’t used Plex in a while, but I’m confused how Plex handles WAN connections without using any port forwarding? how is that possible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is despicable. What specific service was this? So I know how to avoid it if it should resurface.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Not only does it say that in the first paragraph, it says it here

Five men were convicted for their part in operating Jetflicks, one of the largest illegal streaming services in the U.S., officials said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My use of the word despicable instead of disgusting probably threw you off

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/thats-disgusting-where

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I just didn’t think the meme fit when it already said where

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why in the world would you do this in the US?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean we’re dumb kids until they raid us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

There are resellers in the US who will set you up with the infrastructure to do it yourself. You don’t need much and it’s less expensive than you’d think, almost turnkey.

Demand is more than high enough in poor areas too, they probably made a really good return before it shut down.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 152K

    Comments