1 point
*

It’s sad that these people got taken down. Maybe the next people to do it will do it from a country that does not have extradition with the United States, so they would be safe.

Edit: As for payment providers attempting to take such a service down, Monero would be the answer to this.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

“The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services”

They used the basic tools that most(?) pirates use today like sonarr and radar??

I don’t mind people pirating…i do mind people pirating and profiting from redistribution.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

redistribution = service?

Why would they work for free?

Not gonna pretend like this aint illegal but i don’t cry over some IP owners losing money… EVER, fuck 'em

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh I don’t care that the IP owner don’t get money.

IDK, I just don’t like the ethics of pirating media for profit, the entire idea is that it should be accessible to everyone, not just those with money. Cover your operational cost? Sure…Making millions in subscriptions? That is an asshole move IMO. If you’re paying, you might as well pay the people who are making the media in the first place instead of some rando that had nothing to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

All fair points.

I think the issue is that IP owners are mega corps, ie people who made the content don’t own it and can’t provide it anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Guessing they used Sonarr, Radarr, qBittorrent, maybe an NZB client…

Would you look at that, I’m sophisticated now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe even Jellyseerr

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

My guess is because they did all the pirating for you so you didn’t have to worry about dealing with the technical hurdles of doing so.

If a service like this came around that allowed me to pay with Monero and did not require any personally identifiable information, I would totally fucking use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

because piracy is a service problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Because all the legal services are incredibly anti-consumer and are offering less services, with (more) ads, for more money every year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The entire system exists for the benefit of business, not customers.

Just look at what happens with accused theft in a store. You get accused of theft? Cops are there in no time, take you to the ground, throw you in the back of the cop car. only after they’ve gotten the humiliation and brutalization in might someone come and take your proof that you didnt steal anything.

You accuse the store of stealing from you? Due to not following their own policy on returns, or overcharging and an item and not fixing it Police won’t even show. just tell you its a civil matter and to suck it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pirating implies some knowledge and effort some people may not have or want to get into

Paid Legal services are so enshitified some people may think they are getting ripped up

Paid illegal services are often HUGE bang for buck value (no enshitification, no limits, no nonsense and often better customer service)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the legal options are garbage.

The pirates provide a better service with more content for cheaper than the legal options; and pirating yourself takes effort as well as cost (hardware, trackers, usenet, etc).

Some people are happy to just pay for decent service; others like to learn about the process, then setup and run their own servers.

To each their own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

In addition to other things people responded with, piracy services tend to not collect users data or prevent us from watching with a VPN enabled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

or prevent us from watching with a VPN enabled.

Man this one chaff’s me the most. I way a paying Netflix customer like 8 years ago. I had IPv6 setup as a 6rd tunnel through HE (Hurricane Electric) because my ISP didn’t offer IPv6. Netflix treated that as a VPN and blocked me as a paying customer… Even though I lived/payed from the same fucking locale. It’s not like I was using a VPN to bypass a Geoblock. I was just making IPv6 available to myself. I cancelled because of that. You do not get to tell me how I access the internet at large, especially when I’m not even being shady about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I run a massive streaming service too, which is also way bigger than all the streamers combined. It’s just only distributed over my private home network. Jellyfin for the win!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

You’re under arrest!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Love my Jellyfin server, but I have 2 gripes over just using VLC.

  • Can’t use the scroll wheel for volume. It’s a pain aiming for the volume from across the room on the couch.

  • JF won’t boost volume past 100% like VLC.

Know of any fixes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you playing directly on your server?

For the first one at least you could solve it by running JF with a Chromecast or similar device.
Feels cleaner than a wireless mouse in the living room too, IMO

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s weird to me that anyone would use a PC hooked up to a TV from a couch in 2024, but I’m sure it (otherwise) works for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You might want to consider streaming it on your TV. Modern TVs should have a Plex app at the least. Or use a Chromecast or other setup. I watch on my couch with the TV remote. Its the same experience as watching Netflix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Plex isn’t Jellyfin though. Lots of TV’s/TV OS’s have Jellyfin app but it’s pretty basic. I’d recommend an AppleTV with Infuse, it’s super built out with all sorts of great features. It’s a better app than all of the streaming services

permalink
report
parent
reply

Can’t use the scroll wheel for volume. It’s a pain aiming for the volume from across the room on the couch.

apparently this is supposed to be coming in the 9.0 feature release. So soon™ I’d have to look to be sure, but apparently it’s coming.

Volume is weird, i feel like i’d almost like either a “volume target” option, to match volume levels between content, or some sort of fixed audio boost level. Idk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Volume is weird, i feel like i’d almost like either a “volume target” option, to match volume levels between content, or some sort of fixed audio boost level. Idk.

Adding replaygain tags to your content could help here, but it’s a manual process, particularly since it’s not normally included in released videos. And I’m not sure if jellyfin supports replaygain tags from video (presumably it does for audio only files).

mpv definitely does support it at least, with “–replaygain=track”.

Of course, none of this helps with OPs situation, because enabling replaygain will actually lower the volume on most files, so it can account for high dynamic range content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Love how they make this sound like some incredible feat. When you aren’t bound to license agreements, turns out it’s actually very easy to have a “massive” content library. Literally the only hurdle is storage space.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I mean, distributing it isn’t a small feat. Plus you need to manage subscriptions, billings, CMS, a front end to navigate the content, etc.

That’s no small amount of work, even if they used out of the box solutions for many layers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

5 people could do it though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Depends how many users.

But yeah a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

All of those things already exist. Typically it’s just a Plex server running on a cloud service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah like… Netflix has peering agreements and whatnot but… It’s not 2005.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Both Wikipedia and Stack Overflow just have a few dozen fast servers despite being some of the world’s highest trafficked websites

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The entire content of the wikipedia fits in a pen drive.

Streaming video is a lot more expensive than text and images.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah it costs, depending on quality of course.
My 14 TB disks are filling up faster than I expected and I am not close to Netflix’s catalogue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, I got a 14tb drive back in February and it’s 90 percent full already. My media collection will always grow to fill the space available.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You guys wouldn’t happen to have any tips on DVD ripping would you? I’d like to go all digital but I just can’t make Handbrake work.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 152K

    Comments