211 points

When are people going to understand it’s not about being right. She is teeing up soundbites for right wing media to clip and talk about “how brave she is for tackling the corrupt EPA.”

permalink
report
reply
107 points

We are just enjoying stupidity being laughed at publicly instead of having to hide it for ‘decorum’. The reason she is being stupid is not relevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

We all know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Apparently this article doesn’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

The journalist does, probably. But this isn’t an opinion piece where they get to characterize what they assume her corrupt intentions to be. They’re reporting on the exchange, which all happened as described. They threw in his response, where he pointed out that she’s doing it for sound bites while praising and working with the EPA behind closed doors. What more can the journalist say? This isn’t a twitter post…but it is the independent. Which isn’t exactly much better. But it still needs to have the appearance of journalistic standards

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It does matter to highlight her idiocy to the parts of the country not in the cult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-59 points

So lmk when you plan to stand against Biden, he literally has crossed all his morals so clearly has none left, and/or how do you plan to defend him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Their comments get a lot of downvotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

You are a bot so waste your chatgpt credits on being useful

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I would like you to tell me how to “stand against Biden.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Vote Trump or don’t vote at all!” Obviously

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

/LostLemmings

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well nobody was even talking about him for starters, and most successful president in the last 20 years?

permalink
report
parent
reply
121 points

great. doesn’t matter, that bitch won her primary, and is going to win the seat she carpetbagged her way into. all the shaudenfruede means nothing when the monsters still have the majority in the house, and can legislate. yeah she’s a moron. republicans don’t give a shit.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

She won against the last Democrat by less percentage than my current BAC in a solid red district. Her being the candidate is the best hope for Dems to take that seat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

She’s not campaigning for a seat in the same district. She moved to a district in Eastern Colorado because she knew she couldn’t get elected in the same district she ran in last time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Honestly, I’d rather Bobo get the seat than a Republican who may actually be able to legislate their awful beliefs. Boebert is a clown, but in the grand scheme of things, she’s a pretty ineffective member of Congress. Only 3 of her introduced bills have passed the House.

She may generate sound clips for the right wing media machine, but they seem to be able to generate endless hate porn without much want or worry. I don’t think Lauren is their golden goose, laying gilded shits.

So on balance, Bobo taking up a deep R seat isn’t the worst outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

.17 - pretty good for a Thursday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Plot twist: your name is Bender Bending Rodriguez and your current BAC is 70.00

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

A real fan would know he always uses 40%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That dude is my hero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Republican voters neither have shame nor self respect. That’s why they keep voting for carpetbaggers like Bobert, Majorie, Chickenshit Hawley etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Is there nothing we can do to prevent her re-election?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Boebert defeated five other Republicans for the party’s nomination in Colorado’s 4th District, which opened up after Rep. Ken Buck announced this year that he would resign. She will be heavily favored to win the seat in the general election given the area’s rightward lean.

[x]

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, I didn’t word that well. I know it’s not re-election to the same seat, but it’s elected again to congress. What would it take to defeat her in the general election? Money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

yes. it’s really simple. somebody just needs to do it. make an example out of her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

By the end of the back-and-forth, Regan stared at Boebert shaking his head with his mouth a gap.

“It’s just shocking you spent so much time with our regional staff and regional administration and region aid and have such productive conversations about how we’re doing things for your district and your state and then you take this microphone and you pretend that we should not exist,” Regan said.

Oh it’s all a big show for the idiots? Of course. She’s so dumb she can’t even make up an imaginary question.

permalink
report
reply
70 points

That’s not the kind of head she good with

permalink
report
reply
46 points
*

Hey, good thing our Supreme Court just ruled that people like her (and ultimately, them) will be the ones deciding ALL OF OUR REGULATIONS.

And stupid fucks like Boebert are actually desirable in that situation. Moreso than the more clever folks that will just get corporate lobbiests to literally write the regulations themselves for an $18k “donation” to their “campaign,” and a promise of a job after they’re voted out in two years or whatever.

If Congress does not codify Chevron deference before Trump (or any other conservative) takes office, then kiss “the administrative state” goodbye. And if you think you’re ok with that, or have some clever retort about “bureaucracy bad,” then you’re gonna find out real quick…

permalink
report
reply
14 points

$18k “donation”

This is the part I hate the most about this. It’s one thing that we have this “squint a little and you’ll see it” kind of graft and corruption. It’s another entirely that the going rate for sending us all down the river is appallingly low. Especially since the kind of money a corporation can make for a favorable legal change could be a thousand times that, or more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The reason corporations buy politicians is because they’re cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Don’t be so pessimistic! It really adds up if you do it enough!

Plus, the cushy job after leaving office is the real prize. Why don’t you just go ask John Boehner? Motherfucker spent a several decade career demonizing cannabis, blocking its decriminalization and putting hundreds of thousands of people in prison for it. He was the third second(? do you count the president?) person in line of presidential succession for at least a decade (think about that). Now he works at a pro-cannabis legalization lobby group (at least as of the last time I looked. Not going to google that piece of shit right now).

Republicans have no morals or ethics. They have no values to stand by.

The fact that they concede that they can’t stop themselves from raping and murdering folks without some kind of threat of cosmic torture is a pretty big self-report.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 85K

    Comments