Previously the reporting on this did not have a political angle and so it was removed from Politics and correctly directed to News.

The charges related to terrorism now give this a political angle.

“Luigi Mangione is accused of first-degree murder, in furtherance of terrorism; second-degree murder, one count of which is charged as killing as an act of terrorism; criminal possession of a weapon and other crimes.”

The terrorism statutes can be found here:

https://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/ny-penal-law-490-25-crime-of-terrorism.html

“The act must be committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.”

199 points
*

Storming the capital or shooting dozens of children are not terrorism, but shooting a CEO who murders thousands is. Got it.

They’re clearly trying to send a message to scare his supporters

permalink
report
reply
21 points

They’re clearly trying to send a message to scare his supporters

Yes, they are. By charging him as a terrorist, they are saying that anyone who supports him is supporting terrorism. I’m sure that someone somewhere is making very long lists of names of social media posters and people who donated to his legal defense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

New York law vs. Federal Law. ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Without a doubt, “;)” is the most passive aggressive emoticon in the history of the written language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What’s the most directly aggressive one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

You can tell the corpos are really upset when the government they own brings out the T word.

permalink
report
reply
133 points

Self defence, not guilty

permalink
report
reply
48 points

Justifiable homicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Nah. I have an out. Insurance CEOs simply aren’t human. The charge should be animal cruelty at the worst. Luigi should get the same criminal penalty as someone would get for stepping on a cockroach. Murder requires the thing you’re destroying to actually be a human being.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That reminds me that you should never make the mistake of anthropomorphizing Larry Ellison

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Nullify the jury. A man can break the letter and spirit of the law if the jury decides he should not be punished for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*

Terror?

Come the fuck on, Feds New York. Absolutely fucking not. This sparked joy, not terror, in the populace. This was, to be quite frank, the exact opposite of terrorism.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

It also makes light of actual terrorists. Perhaps they aren’t all bad after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is like saying a wife killing their abusive husband is an act of terror. Clearly she’s saying she’s not taking the abuse anymore and any man or woman that treats her so poorly would meet a similar end. The perp that killed UnitedHealthcare’s CEO and those cheering him on are saying the same thing – enough abuse. We’re all terrorists because we want CEOs that do real harm to their customers to be held accountable? The current system is completely ill-equipped to even do so much as shame these abusers (i.e. libel and slander laws).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It sparked terror in the people that actually matter, the ruling class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s not the Feds, it’s the state of New York.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is the best argument against the terrorism charges. Should we have a fucking parade to show how NOT terrorized we feel?

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Whatever. United Healthcare should be next for the countless murders they’ve done.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

We don’t put corporations on trial in America, silly billy

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments