16 points
  • this is terrifying.
  • This does not sound legally permissible, see posse comitatus.
  • Members of the military have an obligation to refuse illegal orders. I am neither in the military nor a lawyer, so I canā€™t go too deep on that.

Even if we see (likely) ā€œact first, let it wind through the courts later,ā€ Iā€™d expect there to be a substantial number of refusals.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Members of the military have an obligation to refuse illegal orders. I am neither in the military nor a lawyer, so I canā€™t go too deep on that.

I have no doubt this is his first step in ferreting out any military leadership who holds loyalty to the constitution over him personally. Whether this particular plan is blocked or not, it lets him clear out anyone who wonā€™t follow his orders without question going forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The US military is actually surprisingly decentralized, with a lot of leeway and authority given directly to NCOs, and officers routinely getting ignored, circumvented, or subjected to malicious compliance if they even order something considered unreasonable, much less illegal. Also see: fragging. Malingering. Mutiny. Desertion. And the worst nightmare - Insider Threat. So much of the military runs purely off of trust, faith, and compliance to words on a page.

You think Donā€™t Ask Donā€™t Tell was actually fully complied with? Sentries already fall asleep while at their post, willfully, without needing to have any excuse other than being tired or disliking the watch officer. Roving patrols routinely miss rounds, donā€™t actually pay attention or inspect anything, and practice what we call ā€œblazing logsā€, that is, writing down ā€œall conditions satisfactoryā€ without actually looking at the conditions. Maintenance also gets blazed all the time - technicians just straight up not doing the required maintenance and writing down that they did, substituting unauthorized materials, or half-assing the maintenance. Paperwork just gets ā€œlostā€, or never gets signed, never gets filed, never makes it to the intended recipient, just because the admin secretary doesnā€™t feel like it. Information isnā€™t entered into a system, including disciplinary or otherwise disqualifying stuff, because the admin or command likes you or needs you.

Purging the upper brass wonā€™t do anything to circumvent or ā€œfixā€ any of that, itā€™ll make it worse, because itā€™ll incentivize the servicemembers to do it even more. The E-4 Mafia will straight up disappear when needed, entire supply chains will stop cold. Separation and disciplinary paperwork will just not get sent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What does America look like to the world if the most powerful military in the world refuses to follow orders from itā€™s elected government.

These idiots are going to turn the whole world upside down. Other nations military alliances will shift. China will swoop in to establish stability in itā€™s region of interest, Taiwan, slowing down our AI race (Biden tried to help get us started on that with the CHIPS act, thanks Brandon). We have a head start on quantum computing research, for now. But Europe is leading on physics and fusion reactors. But science is for nerds, so Europe will lose support from itā€™s most powerful ally leaving it open to Russia, who isnā€™t leading in much of anything these days and could really just use a win. First theyā€™ll take the breadbasket because soldiers need to eat. And then continue to disrupt, weaken and push. Maybe start by cutting some major undersea internet cables. Thatā€™s got to be difficult to fix again, and again. Israel continues to make itself the enemy of the middle east so, America does what America does, go stomp around itā€™s old stomping grounds. Shock and Awe Yā€™all! Donā€™t worry about those recruitment numbers, theyā€™re just a phase, the poor will still join. China and Russia keep pushing out, taking control of shipping routes and resources, slowly tighten the noose. China is allowed to keep pushing into ā€˜shitholeā€™ African countries, raping them of their resources. China pushes to AI and Quantum. Russia pushes to Fusion and Physics. Each resource will be dependent on the other. The new world order is in balance.

America dwindles. If weā€™re lucky AI, or Fusion, will solve climate change before we go Venus.

But wait, up on the hill top! Itā€™s Trump, Donald be his name. He has been crowned God King Emperor of Burgers and Men. Aliens have landed on the Whitehouse lawn. They areā€¦ the Whites! Blonde haired and big blue eyes, the most powerful of all aliens in the known galaxy. Their women are red heads, not all of them, but enough to be worth the trouble. Then all true Americans will sing ā€˜America, Fuck Yeah!ā€™ as they rise up into the glorious heavens above to live with alien Jesus.

šŸ–•šŸ»šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ–•šŸ»šŸ‘½ Peace Among Worlds!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or France, which I remind you has thermonuclear weapons, will start selling said thermonuclear weapons to the rest of the EU, which then enables them to conduct retaliatory strategic strikes on Russia if it invades. Iran immediately develops and deploys thermonuclear weapons (they really only need to put the things together, they have all the parts they need) for strategic or tactical strikes against Israel. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Australia will acquire thermonuclear weapons for self-defense once the US nuclear umbrella is removed - and they have more than enough resources and know-how to just manufacture nuclear weapons from existing materials. India, with a higher population than China and an existing strategic thermonuclear arsenal, can and will turn the entirety of the Indian Ocean into a no-passage zone simply by attacking merchant transit lanes with their destroyers, effectively blockading China from much-needed Middle Eastern fuel and African minerals.

And if Putin decides to use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine or Europe? Pandoraā€™s box is open, baby. Nukes deployed all over the world, mushroom clouds galore. You get cancer, and YOU get cancer, and YOU get cancer, everybody gets cancer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What does America look like to the world if the most powerful military in the world refuses to follow orders from itā€™s elected government.

Capable of resisting a rogue government that was put in place by a foreign country? A half-functional democracy that thwarted a Nazi Germany 2.0?

Do we really look cooler on the world stage if we just prove our military are stooges that will ā€˜just follow ordersā€™?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

where do you go if you have no papers? a stateless purgatory camp?

permalink
report
reply
14 points

theyā€™re called concentration camps because they concentrate all ā€œillegalsā€ in one convenient location for ā€œprocessingā€.

people will lie to you and say itā€™s not possible. they will lie to you and tell you it would never come to that. they will lie to you and tell you citizens would never allow that to happen.

they lied to themselves for eight years and said never again.

Itā€™s happening again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What if he threw a national emergency and no one paid attention?

permalink
report
reply
55 points

So, the Orange Turd plans on suspending the US Constitution and using the so-called national emergency to go for the full power grab. I certainly hope the US military upholds the pledge to protect the US Constitution.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

The US president is the commander in chief and the US military is subservient to US president, never mind how many of them come from the MAGA cult bubble themselves. The military is a poor safeguard for democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Weā€™ll see. The military is under pretty clear orders to defend the constitution from threats both foreign and domestic. Trump ia domestic threat and a fascist, and fascists flip the truth upside down, so heā€™ll accuse immigrants of being a domestic threat as a way of trying to convince the military to violate their oath. Heā€™ll certainly replace legitimate generals with spineless lackey loyalists, but the oath isnā€™t to obey generals, itā€™s to protect the constitution, and it goes from top to bottom.

This will be a trickier test of the militaryā€™s quality than WW2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The oath to protect the US Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies takes priority. You are correct in one regard, it will depend on the military leadership and soldiers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

You know what amazes me? That any vaguely brown person who voted for Trump didnā€™t seem to think that even if they are literally carrying their papers at all times and easily able to prove their citizenship, they are gonna be harassed constantly for the next four years. With hopeful some state exceptions, they are going to have to be very careful to speak only 'Murican in public and suppress public display of non-American cultures. They are literally going to be having to watch their backs every day.

WTF.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I imagine the population of New Mexico is going to swell quite a bit in the next four years.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the siteā€™s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. Itā€™s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). Itā€™s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to ā€œMom! Heā€™s bugging me!ā€ and ā€œIā€™m not touching you!ā€ Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Thatā€™s all the rules!

Civic Links

ā€¢ Register To Vote

ā€¢ Citizenship Resource Center

ā€¢ Congressional Awards Program

ā€¢ Federal Government Agencies

ā€¢ Library of Congress Legislative Resources

ā€¢ The White House

ā€¢ U.S. House of Representatives

ā€¢ U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

ā€¢ News

ā€¢ World News

ā€¢ Business News

ā€¢ Political Discussion

ā€¢ Ask Politics

ā€¢ Military News

ā€¢ Global Politics

ā€¢ Moderate Politics

ā€¢ Progressive Politics

ā€¢ UK Politics

ā€¢ Canadian Politics

ā€¢ Australian Politics

ā€¢ New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments