Tesla’s reveal of a robotaxi designed as a low-slung, two-seater, sporty coupe - quite the opposite of a typical taxi with room for several passengers and luggage - flummoxed investors and analysts.

But in true Musk style, he skipped over expectations of how a two-seater robotaxi would serve the needs of families headed to a restaurant or to the airport, or if he expected these to appeal only to a niche clientele.

Investors jeered the design and the lack of financial detail, with Tesla stocks tumbling 9% on Wall Street on Friday.

“When you think of a cab, you think of something that’s going to carry more than two people,” said Jonathan Elfalan, vehicle testing director for the automotive website Edmunds.com. “Making this a two-seat-only car is very perplexing.”

61 points

It looks like they were working on the new roadster and Elmo told them they were switching to a driverless cab.

If it were a sports car it would probably sell really well because it’s got the doors that open like this

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Im gonna start calling him Elmo from now on haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

On a related note…

Full Self Driving coming next year? Or the year after that? Or after that?

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Musk and “FSD is coming next year” is like Trump and “I only want to be dictator for a day”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

More like his healthcare plan. Or his infrastructure plan

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Details will be shared in two weeks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There are concepts of FSD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

In two years presumably. It’s been two years away since 2015.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yes. But also: No. Mostly no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What was his first prediction on that like 2015?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We’ll have FSD as soon as we get those flying cars with AGI I’ve been told are a few years away my entire life.

Space colonies too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There are self driving waymo taxis in San Francisco, it is only a fiction for Musk

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Those also use a combination of many different sensors to see the road around them, while Tesla stubbornly refuses to use anything except vision because that’s how humans do it. Nevermind that even with our best AI models, we’ve never even approximated how the human brain works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Along with what @Bassman1805 says, San Francisco has a small footprint and most of it is laid out in grids, making navigation easier.

Plus, it’s not a problem-free implementation by any means.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/san-francisco-autonomous-vehicles-robotaxis-b2391158.html

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco/san-francisco-neighbors-say-repeated-waymo-honking-is-keeping-them-up-at-night/3622181/

On top of that, it’s way too easy to make them stop working. Not too easy for passengers, too easy for everyone else.

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/26/1195695051/driverless-cars-san-francisco-waymo-cruise

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Always.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

The real problem that he failed to show any progress on self-driving. Self-driving has been 2 years away for the past 6 years and that’s the only real thing that will pull Tesla out of a downward spiral. Tesla stock is stupidly overpriced and competitors are catching up.

With nothing but empty promises, people are starting to realize that the emperor has no clothes. And really, who wants to see Musk naked? …that’s a bag nobody wants to be left holding.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

It’s been 1 year away every year, not 2

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Waymo did it well when I was in Tempe, so it already exists. Tesla just wasn’t putting quality hardware into it. The Jaguars were nice

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I’ll take the bus, thanks. At least I will arrive alive at my destination.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

But think of the opportunity cost here, you’d be wasting a chance to run over a child or a poor person!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m only taking this chance if I know elon will be in the road on my route at some point. Someone’s gonna get the X!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

It may only have 2 seats, but didn’t they notice the tires are painted gold. That’s an awesome design decision right there! /s
The 2 seats are probably meant to keep the death toll low. 😋

But if they thought the robotaxi was weird, that was nothing compared to the robovan. Almost no clearance and almost no windows, and then Musk exclaimed: Yes! We are gonna build it like that! It’s siiick.

neither robo- taxi or van are likely to be moneymakers. They’ll be a sinkhole of development cost, that will never come to market.

But more are probably finally catching on, with an event causing the stock to drop 9%.
It’s kind of hilarious that Enron Musks attempt to pump the stock failed so bad. 😋

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.7K

    Posts

  • 157K

    Comments