We’re watching US democracy dying right before our eyes.

If Biden and the Democrats had any mental coherency and a spine they’d be using this ruling to their advantage and fuck over conservatives before conservatives get into office to kill democracy and the opposition parties.

139 points

Great! Now jail and/or execute the 6 corrupt justices. The problem just solved itself.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Dark Brandon, come out to play…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-51 points

I wish. I saw the debate. His people might do some shit on his behalf, but Joe’s mind has gone. I wouldn’t want him managing a Denny’s. I doubt he’s been calling the shots himself for months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s called sundowning which means he’s still effective while the sun’s up 😬

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Naw joe won the debate. Who gives a shit if he talked like an 81 year old tired granddad. People who didnt watch the whole 90 minute debate dont get a say on it. You’re just as bad as maga idiots repeating media drivel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

“He is sick”

Bullshit, that’s how dementia works - first you have bad days, then you only have good days left, then… it’s just days.

I am no doctor, but I do worry about what I see, as someone who has eyes? 👀

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

This will not happen. Democrats are fucking pussies and I keep voting for their pussy asses even though they don’t do anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If they were as freaked out by the democratic agenda as they say they are, they would never have made this ruling. It really shows that there is nothing to fear from the democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Gotta elect that string of dictators disinclined from exercising their powers 🤷

Fuck this is so bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Democrats aren’t pussies. Democrats are another arm of the ruling class (aka the 0.1%). There’s a reason they act inept on these things. It makes for good theater which people eat up, but it’s all for the rich. That’s the biggest reason they’ve been remiss to move to the left. The only ones fighting for us are ones that are considered “progressive”, which are greatly in the minority. Once you realize this, a lot more of the democratic leadership actions (or lack thereof), makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Bastille Day is next weekend. I think that’s enough time to order and assemble a guillotine. IKEA has those, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So you’re telling me Biden could imprison SCOTUS and he’d be free from prosecution?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I guess they would need to decide if it’s an official act or not. But if they’re no longer in SCOTUS, and/or in jail/dead, how could they decide?

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points
*

So, the United States is no longer a democracy. If a president wants to remain in power despite losing an election, they can, as long as they get the right people behind them, which is how every dictatorship works. What makes democracies different is that they have laws to stop that, and the supreme court just ruled those don’t apply to the president. There is no mechanism to stop them. You can say impeachment, but the results of an impeachment against the president are as much of a foregone conclusion as a North Korean election. The trappings of democracy does not unmake a dictatorship.

We’re no longer a democracy, and the only way we can ever return to being one is if we elect a string of dictators who feel disinclined to push their power as far as it can go. If we can do that long enough to get this decision overturned, we can have our democracy back.

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

You can’t impeach him when he officially drone strikes the vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

The U.S. Constitution includes several provisions that limit the powers of the president and prevent the president from committing crimes without consequences:

Article I, Section 2 and Section 3: These sections provide the House of Representatives the power to impeach the president and the Senate the power to try and convict the president. Impeachment is a process by which the president can be removed from office for committing “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Article II, Section 4: This section specifically states that the president, vice president, and all civil officers of the United States can be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 8: The president must take an oath of office to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” This oath implies a legal and ethical obligation to adhere to the law and Constitution.

Checks and Balances: The Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances, whereby the legislative and judicial branches can limit the actions of the executive branch. Congress can pass laws, override presidential vetoes, and control the budget, while the judiciary can review the constitutionality of presidential actions through judicial review.

Together, these provisions and principles ensure that the president is subject to the rule of law and can be held accountable for criminal actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just going to point out that the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Amendments to the constitution are all specificying that the citizenship are the final check to keep the government in balance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is why this election is so important. I know it’s said in every election but this one may be the last free* election.

That * is there because I know that Republicans have made inroads in red states, with many secretaries of state either vowing to not verify a Biden win or not affirming that they will certify the election.

Please, for the love of democracy and our Republic, consider volunteering as an election official or as an observer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Not just the next election, either. We can’t afford to have a Republican president again until this has been overturned, or the party has undergone a radical reform

“This is the most important election of our lifetime” is gonna be true for every election until the GOP stops using any power they can get to inoculate themselves from voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I came to realize this sometime around April of 22, I kinda had a complete mental breakdown, as in I quit my job and tried something crazy career wise because it gave me a feeling of control over my life again. I landed on my feet but that’s not the point. The point is that we are now locked into an ever repeating cycle of stopping the fascists. Which means it will be decades, until after all the ancient occupiers of power have passed. But by the time that comes I don’t even know what the world will look like, we need a general stirke

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

When dictatorship is a fact, revolution becomes a right.

-Victor Hugo

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The whole process could be foreshortened by rapidly shrinking the count of filled seats on SCOTUS. Make it dangerous to be a conservative on the bench and see how many fuckwits still decide it is a career move they see as valid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Is it an official act to order drone strikes on over half of the supreme court? Nobody knows! Sounds like a case for the remaining justices to figure out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

We’re no longer a democracy, and the only way we can ever return to being one is if we elect a string of dictators who feel disinclined to push their power as far as it can go

The right to bear arms is provided to protect yourself from tyranny, both foreign and domestic. Less than 250 years ago we gave Great Britain the finger.

One thing I admire about the French is their ability to remind those in power who they should be working for, forcibly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The notion that a civilian militia could plausibly overcome the US military was outdated over 100 years ago. The only viable path toward a violent revolution in the United States is getting all or most of the military on board.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’ll be parts of the military versus other parts of the military, and both sides arming guerilla fighters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I haven’t considered a militia. I figure a lone gunman could do a considerable amount of damage, assuming they had good timing and were a decent enough shot.

Navy SEAL Chris Kyle has 160 confirmed kills as a sniper. There are only 100 members of senate and 9 in the Supreme Court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

The United States Supreme Court is corrupt and illegitimate.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

They’re in dire need of a visit from Seal Team 6.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Best I can do is meal team 6 aka gravy seals

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Searching for Al Quesadilla and led by Admiral Snackbar, their mission is to combat hypertension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

How can Thomas say both anything a president says to the DOJ is an immune official act AND ALSO SAY that Jack Smith is not legitimate?

It seems Biden has carte Blanche to sic the FBI/CIA/DOJ/ST6 on Trump. His very life may depend on wielding this power. Thanks everyone.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Thomas is very experienced with cognitive dissonance

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Because he doesn’t care to maintain the pretense of justice. He and Scalia are tired of pretending and want to start on the outright fascism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Scalia is doing whatever the opposite of rolling over in your grave is right about now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

“justice” boner has a new meaning

Also eww

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He should sic them on SCOTUS instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Seems simple enough…

Biden’s actions on the Southern border are official acts, he has immunity.

Trump’s actions leading to 1/6 are not official acts, no immunity.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

According to you, a person thinking logically and operating in good faith. All an authoritarian needs now is the judge, who can be appointed by the authoritarian themselveswith little oversight, to say whatever they want to do is an official act. We have an irrefutable king again in other words

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This reminds me of another circular argument: Anything the president does can be considered “acting presidential” simply because they’re president. You might’ve thought that shitposting on twitter was unbecoming of a world leader, but once a president does it, it’s okay for a president to do.

An argument to protect a fool from public criticism now doubles as a defense against legal action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s theoretically the structure here. The case gets sent back for the first judge to decide what acts were official, time passes, they say none of them were, an appeal happens, time passes, the appeals court agrees, an appeal happens, time passes, Trump is president so the question is moot. Or they decide they were all official to kiss the ring. Far right cabal rule America indefinitely.

The key thing they needed to do was introduce a new question to the original court. Outright declaring it all immune might cause riots and electoral consequences, but saying “it might be immune” means idiots will still think the engine of justice is moving along enough for the consequences both for Trump, the justices, and the larger fascist team to be irrelevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 110K

    Comments