49 points
*

The only people who can stop politicians from being able to participate in the stock market is politicians and well…

Some of the founding fathers were even benefiting from stock and bond trading and selling.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Some of the founding fathers owned slaves. I don’t think they’d have much of a problem with this

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

That’s incorrect. The SEC is responsible for holding Congress accountable to the insider trading laws already in place. Congress is not exempt, nor are they charged with self-policing.

https://www.congressionalinstitute.org/2018/08/16/can-members-of-congress-engage-in-insider-trading/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

My comment was meaning to say that the only people who can put laws in place to stop politicians from being able to participate in trading stocks are politicians.

Clearly the laws in place do not stop them currently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I follow, but that’s not correct. The laws are already preventing them from insider trading. The SEC is not holding them accountable. More laws won’t change the lack of enforcement. Pressing the SEC to do their job is the solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

For those of you in the US, the are a couple of funds which track politician’s holdings and invest/digest with them. NANC is the democrat tracking one and KRUZ is the republican tracking one.

This way, you too can stick your snout in the trough.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

They were both started in Feb 2023. So there isn’t a long track record to go by.

In the last 12 months.
NANC has gained 40%.
KRUZ has gained 27%.
VTSAX has gained 33.8%. (Vanguard total stock index)

They both have expense ratios of 0.75%.
VTSAX is 0.04%.
So you loose nearly 1% each year in management fees. That’s a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Also, we hear about the buys and sells after the fact, not immediately.

So there’s a lag on decisions that may be impactful

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Interesting, thanks! I’d only ever seen it as amusing (UK based so couldn’t buy it anyway), but good to know how it actually stacks up. I wonder if that also means that Nancy herself would have been better to just buy an index tracker and avoid all the negative stories!

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Visa has been under intense scrutiny since for at least several months. We wouldn’t up and sue Visa out of nowhere so you know Visa was being discussed for awhile. I’m curious how much of this was just paying attention, like with a surprisingly high number of “corrupt insider trades,” or if it’s actually corrupt.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

The investigation was announced publicly a year ago.

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/visa-discloses-further-demands-us-doj-over-ongoing-anti-trust-probe-2023-07-26/

And it should be noted that when he sold these shares, the share price was even lower than it is now after the lawsuit was announced and the stock dropped within the last few days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I wish there was more push back for these ghouls enriching themselves like this.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

You might even refer to them as suave villains… :D

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Those ghouls are at it again. Though that implies it is anything other than business as usual.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 130K

    Comments