Marques Brownlee, known as MKBHD, faced backlash over his new wallpaper app, Panels, due to its high subscription cost ($49.99/year) and concerns over excessive data permissions.

Brownlee acknowledged user feedback, promising to adjust ad frequency for free users and address privacy concerns, clarifying that the app’s data disclosures were broader than intended.

The app, which offers curated wallpapers and shares profits with artists, aims to improve over time, despite criticisms of its design and monetization approach.

90 points
*

$50 a year for wallpapers or I could go to wallhaven and get millions for free?

permalink
report
reply
41 points

The “shares its profits with the artists” part is relevant here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

It would almost be cheaper to commission an artist frankly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

For a single piece sure.

I presume the idea here is that you have access to their full library. Personally, I fail to see why I would change my wallpaper enough to warrant even a free app to change it, let alone 50 bucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Almost is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you know an artist doing commissions that cheap they are depressed, desperate, or want to fuck you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Just use a free wallpaper app and pay a random artist 25 bucks

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I’m an artist who has uploaded many of my works to wallhaven entirely for free online, alongside the games I put out and any other creative venture I’ve pursued over the years.

That part is problematic not relevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

okay, cool, but I am going to assume you don’t speak for all artists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Did he disclose an amount?

5% to artists is very different than 40% to artists.

Or is he adopting the Spotify bottom line?

Only pay artists after X downloads and only pay a few cents after thousands of downloads and use the rest for profits

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s 50%, which is honestly quite low

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This. Hell you can generate literally endless wallpapers for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
1 point
*

The wallpapers are nice but the website is hideous and unusable.

Edit: typo

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which side?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

the website is hideous and unusable

huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Use Muzei and either curate your own collection or pull in one of their pre-made ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

It costs $49.99 per year (or $11.99 per month)

Why in the hell does the monthly price end with you paying 280% more than the yearly. That is such an absurd discount I don’t even know why someone would pay at all for this app but more so I want to understand where the price justification is and who came up with this plan.

To be clear I support artists and more than welcome a platform for them to share and sell art if they wish… I don’t get why it needs to be a subscription service and I don’t see how such inflated charges are going to help artists as it’ll just discourage large numbers of people wanting to support them.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I want to understand where the price justification is

The justification is that people should be yearly subscribers when they can more easily forget to cancel it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-decision-lab/201109/product-pricing-and-framing-when-are-we-likely-pay-more

Short version: there’s an $80 bread maker with 5 features, a $120 bread maker with 12 features, and a $475 bread maker with 14 features.

The $475 bread maker only exists to make the $120 version look like a bargain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But in the end you get more feature for a higher price. In this case it’s the same app for different prices depending on time frame… not to mention the app has no purpose beyond finding a wallpaper so it only really has 1 feature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The point is not whether there are more features. The point is to give you an incentive to go yearly, and in this case it’s a huge “discount” even though it’s in no way worth the monthly cost. The monthly plan isn’t meant to sell you the monthly plan. It’s meant to make the yearly plan look good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Also the nature of a wallpaper app, maybe you just want to plop in get a wallpaper and scamper off into the sunset.

Matter of fact for the $50 a year price I could sign back up for a month twice a year and still come out on top.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I believe this is called the anchoring effect in psychology, and it’s really effective

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bingo. Major component of persuasive design.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Probably because you can pay for a month and download all the wallpapers and cancel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I started to get worked up but then i remembered I don’t particularly care. He’s in it to make bank, not necessarily sell you a quality product. If he were, he wouldn’t be selling a wallpaper app.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yeah it seems like a weird thing to get mad about. No one is forcing anyone to pay this guy for his wallpaper app. Keep watching his videos if you enjoy them or don’t. The wallpaper app seems as inconsequential as his DBrand shilling. I watch his reviews every year and I’ve never bought anything from DBrand lol. Mostly because the products look like shit tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That just about sums it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
175 points

Apparently one of the wallpapers is just solid orange. It’s called “Orange”, is labeled as “abstract”, and is labeled with a copyright.

It’s a solid orange rectangle.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Maybe it’s inspired by Rothko

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
0 points

Could be, the man was a fucking genius hi created some of my personal favourite paintings.

Was that your point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

The artist spent a lot of time on that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Months to get that perfect shade of orange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And just the effort of painting every one of those pixels one by one, it’s not like we have some magic tool to fill an image with the same color and call it a day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Perhaps more likely years of work with colour and colour theory preceding a quick output of some content? Why the sarcastic tone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That is a measure of exactly nothing.

https://www.nme.com/photos/30-minutes-or-less-19-famous-songs-written-at-staggering-speed-1422651

Your post makes it very clear that you have little experience in the creative world. There is no linear measure of successs or quality. You do a great disservice to those toiling with their creativity by making comments such as this one. We need artists, they are fragile things and should be treated with care.

I didn’t start this post planning to get hetup but I do feel that taking umbrage to your comment is fair, if not tautological.

I would encourage you to labour over a still life or wrestle a passable rendition of your favourite guitar riff. Try sing the first phrase of your favourite song in key. Trust me: none of those things are easy.

If you don’t like “Orange” then just look at something else and hold your tongue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes your comment is tautological.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Anish Kapoor strikes again

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Wasn’t he also behind the redline icon pack (which I do actually like) but yeah subscription for something you can easily find your own images or even just ask an AI to make.

Subscriptions aren’t something I’ll ever buy into software wise and if they are offering an actual service it better be worth the money and give me more than an image.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 96K

    Comments