Marques Brownlee, known as MKBHD, faced backlash over his new wallpaper app, Panels, due to its high subscription cost ($49.99/year) and concerns over excessive data permissions.

Brownlee acknowledged user feedback, promising to adjust ad frequency for free users and address privacy concerns, clarifying that the app’s data disclosures were broader than intended.

The app, which offers curated wallpapers and shares profits with artists, aims to improve over time, despite criticisms of its design and monetization approach.

8 points

Homie spreads apple propaganda like aids, he’s an awful tech influencer

permalink
report
reply
9 points

MKBD covers all major manufacturers at this point. Unless you want him to say that Apple sucks, don’t see what the complaint is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

He is quite harsh on Apple for someone who gets exclusive access. In this video he is talking about how nothing has changed, barely considered an update and that the new things dont even come with the phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What? He’s in the pocket of all the major OEMs. He’s had zero credibility for years because of this, but he’s never been more deferential to Apple than he has been to Samsung or Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol screw this dude, never liked him to begin with.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

The first time i saw one of his reviews, i thought, “This guy isn’t genuine.” “That’s not an opinion. it’s a specification disguised as an opinion.”

He gave off real shill vibes, and then i later found out he was an apple simp, and it all came together. He isn’t super biased, but he definitely gives more providence to apple products.

His recent review of the apple vr headset was too nice. He said some bad things but qualifies each critisism with a “but i like that” or “but it’s not a deal breaker.”

Maybe i created a bias against him based on my early impressions, but i just get a bad vibe from him. He doesn’t seem to give his opinions.

I will say, though, an exception would be that rabbit thing he reviewed poorly recently and got some backlash from the manufacturer for. I believe he then came back and justified his review. Although everyone was reviewing it poorly so he would give the game away if he said it was good. So perhaps its not an exception… i dont know. Im just freestyling this comment…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When it comes to Apple, check out Snazzy Labs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Totally on board with you. The only tech dudes I trust are ones that are around Linux space bc they usually tend to call out bs when they see it; mental outlaw, someordinarygamers to name a couple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tech bro knob slobber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I’ve never liked this guy, he just always felt like a smarmy asshole each time I tried to watch him and he shilled Apple stuff way too hard for my liking. Blocked his channel and several channels that collabed with him and was mostly able to ignore his existence. Doing something shitty like this kinda adds confirmation to my perceptions of him. What an out of touch douche move.

permalink
report
reply
91 points
*

$50 a year for wallpapers or I could go to wallhaven and get millions for free?

permalink
report
reply
40 points

The “shares its profits with the artists” part is relevant here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

It would almost be cheaper to commission an artist frankly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Almost is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you know an artist doing commissions that cheap they are depressed, desperate, or want to fuck you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

For a single piece sure.

I presume the idea here is that you have access to their full library. Personally, I fail to see why I would change my wallpaper enough to warrant even a free app to change it, let alone 50 bucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Just use a free wallpaper app and pay a random artist 25 bucks

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I’m an artist who has uploaded many of my works to wallhaven entirely for free online, alongside the games I put out and any other creative venture I’ve pursued over the years.

That part is problematic not relevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

okay, cool, but I am going to assume you don’t speak for all artists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Did he disclose an amount?

5% to artists is very different than 40% to artists.

Or is he adopting the Spotify bottom line?

Only pay artists after X downloads and only pay a few cents after thousands of downloads and use the rest for profits

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s 50%, which is honestly quite low

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Use Muzei and either curate your own collection or pull in one of their pre-made ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
1 point
*

The wallpapers are nice but the website is hideous and unusable.

Edit: typo

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which side?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

the website is hideous and unusable

huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points

No sane individual is going to pay for a subscription for phone backgrounds.

That is absolutely a stupid business idea and the people who came up with it should be publicly shamed.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

I’ve not looked into it, but it’s probably pitched as a feel-good way of supporting artists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

You think it’s new? It’s have already done by so many people in Android community. Like Widepaper, Wallfever, Wallbyte etc. These all apps are paid. People actually pay for Wallpapers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I think buying an app for a couple of quid that has a good curated collection of wallpapers, a nice UX, etc. is a completely fair price to pay for the convenience. I like supporting devs. I fail to see the stupidity.

A $12 monthly subscription is an entirely different beast, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Or even a market that let you just buy individual wallpapers as you want them, like how you used to be able to buy individual tracks in itunes instead of a whole album.

A subscription model is a bit silly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Back in the day people paid for ringtones, wallpapers, etc. Dumbest thing ever were ‘ringbacks’ where you paid to have a song or something play when people called you. So the people buying it didn’t even hear it, they just forced other people to listen to a shitty low fidelity garbled mess of a song they liked while you waited for them to pick up the phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Remember when people paid for ringtones? Doesn’t mean it isn’t stupid, especially as a subscription, but people do stupid things and other people take advantage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And Ringback tones too. For when people called you, so they could listen to your favorite song instead of the ring of the phone while waiting for you to pick up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I forgot about that! And most songs sound like ass when you hear it over a phone, especially before whatever they did in the last decade to make voice calls more clear

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments