She set a tone at the very start when she walked right into his space to shake his hand and made him almost pull back into himself in response. She was in charge and never stopped being in charge.

Harris also managed what neither Joe Biden nor Hillary Clinton nor any of the 2016 Republicans managed to do which is successfully bait Donald Trump and get under his skin. Within a few minutes Trump was visibly angry and not in a way that empowered him but in a way that made him lose focus, go down rabbit holes and generally go off onto damaging tangents. Spittle anger, not righteous anger, shall we say.

222 points

Kamala Harris dominated the debate despite the fact that she was given about 5 minutes less time to speak!

It’s disappointing to see how the media invariably accommodates Trump. Contrary to the rules of the debate, when Trump continued talking after his time was up or demanded to respond to a point Harris made, they often let him by not muting his microphone. This added up to right around 5 minutes of extra speaking time on prime time television for him to spew his lies. The one time Harris tried the same thing she was shut down by the moderators. If there is any silver lining here it’s that Trump probably made his debate performance worse by talking more!

I was glad to see some push back and fact checking by the moderators in regards to Trump’s most egregious lies. Today MAGA is complaining that the debate was rigged and the moderators were against Trump due to the fact checks while they should be thanking ABC for the special treatment that allowed Trump extra air time.

Go Harris/Walz!

permalink
report
reply
117 points

The one time Harris tried the same thing she was shut down by the moderators.

And she didn’t even put up with that. She just waited until her next turn, went back, said her part, and then answered the new question. Trump was basically incoherent by comparison

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

And she only did it to counter a bold face lie he said about herself.
Not 10 minutes before she stated that she did not ban fracking, will not ban fracking and made the tie breaking vote in favor of fracking.
But he still says “shes going to ban fracking if elected” like dude WTH. Are you paying attention?

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

And I, for one, would love it if she actually banned fracking. But that’s not an argument that Trump World can make.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

No. He is in Bizarro World 24/7 and will not have anyone, let alone a woman, tell him otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It was very disappointing, even though it was pretty much as expected. They even let Trump talk over and interrupt the moderators!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

CNN should take some notes. That’s what moderators are supposed to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

On the other hand, she actually originally requested his mic not be muted, probably because she knew he’d hang himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
156 points
*

As one who is 100% on the democratic side, I think Harris obviously won the debate.
But I’m very curious about what Republicans think? Do they think Trump made a good response saying he didn’t need a plan because he isn’t president?
I was a bit disappointed Harris didn’t attack him on the fact that it’s been more than 8 years now since Trump said he would come up with a better healthcare plan. Stressing the 8 years, and the result being still nothing. So a concept of a plan for Trump seems to mean he has NOTHING!

But still, do Republicans view this as Trump did OK?

permalink
report
reply
121 points

From what I’ve been seeing around the internet, Republicans are convinced that the debate was rigged. Harris was given the questions in advance, the moderators were biased, etc. etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

So they are making excuses for Trump, which can only mean they could see that he lost.

I also heard that Trump was alone against 3. I guess because they called out a couple of his lies, especially the insane bit about emigrants eating peoples pets in Ohio.

So apparently some Republicans are not happy with how he did in the debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Some Republicans, like all of the ones endorsing Harris, but Trump’s MAGA core voting base is still shielded by their reality distortion field where Trump “won”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

She actually prepared for the debate! And she’s actually competent at this sort of thing! Totally rigged!

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

She’s a litigator, she treated it like court. Very effective when your opposition makes insane rants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

So it was rigged, but they won? Hmm sounds familiar

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Harris was given the questions in advance

It would need a particular stupid person not to know what kind of topics/questions will come up in such a debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

So I flipped over to Fox News right after to see how they would spin the debate. Everyone spins this stuff, it’s normal, but after that debate, I wanted to see how bad it would be. Well, Hannity was on, and you can imagine how it went. They said Harris was weak, didn’t have answers or dodged the questions, had weird faces, and then they just regurgitated his flat-out lies.

I couldn’t even watch 10 minutes because it was so painfully obvious they were just lying through their teeth, and it was so desperate sounding that to a non-R voter, it came across as them not even watching the debate.

There is spin, then there is flat out lieing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I couldn’t even watch 10 minutes because it was so painfully obvious they were just lying through their teeth, and it was so desperate sounding that to a non-R voter, it came across as them not even watching the debate.

I think that may be their strategy. They assume a lot of their base doesn’t want to watch the debate, instead they just tune in after the fact, and they get the bizarro universe account of what happened presented as fact and thus feel more validated in their beliefs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s crazy how much things have changed in 8 years. Before Trump came on the scene, Fox was very biased, but their stories had a basis in fact. 4 years ago they had gone down the drain, but still prevented a coup by calling AZ for Biden. Now they tell lies about as frequently as Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I’d consider it a win if she gets more registered dems to get out and vote.
That’s the only thing I wish they’d say more often. Get out and vote!

We have loads of people on both sides that are registered, but sit on their ass too much.
Dems vote way less than Reps. Feels like a bad HOA way too often.
Shit gets ruined by bored old people cause they don’t have anything better to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s the only thing I wish they’d say more often. Get out and vote!

Depends on how they say it.

“Pokemon Go…to the polls” still echoes in the dark recesses or my memory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s kind of curious they think Trump won, but still think Harris had earring speakers and the moderators on her side.
I wonder if Harris was fed bad info on her earring speakers?
This sounds like as you write Maga cult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

The moderators probably seemed like they were on her side, because they only fact checked trump. But we all know the reason for that is because most of what he said were lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s the core of everything they believe. Dems are masterful conspirators who control everything and have injectable 5G technology that they can keep completely secret while literally injecting it into people, but they’re also incompetent and can’t run a country. Whichever narrative fits, you run with, even if it means contradicting itself minutes apart, as happened in the debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They think he owned her with the “I’m talking now” line.

For fuck’s sake that’s HER LINE that she said FOUR YEARS AGO, they aren’t even capable of making their own jokes now? Even the insults have to be ripped off secondhand bullshit? Donald is proving himself highly incapable of actually having an independent thought. I’ve always thought he was pretty dumb, but, just, damn. There really is nothing in there, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He was so proud of that line. He crowed about it to Hannity after the debate. That was the one line he had teed up and couldn’t wait to use so he could claim he pwned her. Nobody but his sycophants thought it worked well

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The main thing I think is that she demonstrated she can hold her own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Had he pulled down his pants, shat on the rug, and threw it at the moderators, republicans would think he won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He doesn’t have very good aim and probably would do better to have his diaper boy take off his diaper and set it on the rug.

He is well known to be incontinent to an extreme degree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Amphetamine abuse does that, and it’s been pretty well documented the man eats Adderall like candy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

National Review is about the only place I bother to go for an R take on news, and their front page is not very positive about him this morning.

List of Headlines:

Republicans Blame Debate Moderators as Democrats Take a Victory Lap

Debate 2024: Trump Takes the Bait, but Does It Matter?

Trump’s Trainwreck

Harris Was Completely Wrong to Say That There Are No Americans in Combat Zones Today

An Anticlimactic Debate, an Incomplete Grade

‘Childless Cat Lady’ Taylor Swift Endorses Harris Moments after Debate Wraps

Harris Emerges Largely Unscathed from First-Ever Meeting with an Unfocused Trump

Tim Burton’s Stale Hollywood Gothic: Bobbert says new Beetlejuice not nearly as erotic as the musical

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m so disappointed :

Tim Burton’s Stale Hollywood Gothic: Bobbert says new Beetlejuice not nearly as erotic as the musical

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

I like to make sure people actually read the things I share! 😁

The first half is real from their page, I just assumed the second half was what the article would be about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Lauren only rated it a 2 theater-handjobs out of 10. Very low energy and uninspiring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Childless cat lady Taylor Swift? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Edit: I had to look this up, she called herself this in the endorsement in her sign off message at the end in response to something JD Vance said about women earlier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I liked this one because it’s objectively funny both in context and out. Now you’re informed and entertained!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

That 8 years thing for healthcare could easily backfire. The majority of Americans are very fed up with our healthcare, and Democrats haven’t done much to fix it this administration either (not entirely their fault, we have a gridlocked Congress and Senate, after all). The concept of a plan quote is hilarious, though! My friends and I plan on using it at work from now on.

Anyway, even most Republican media outlets have conceded that Harris won last night. As for the MAGA cult itself, I honestly haven’t bothered to go down that internet hole yet, nor am I likely to. I’m sure there’s countless bots/trolls spinning the story and creating a fake reality already, with plenty of zealots lapping it up because their collective delusion requires it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

That 8 years thing for healthcare could easily backfire. The majority of Americans are very fed up with our healthcare,

Yes but Democrats and particularly Harris want to improve it further, it’s the Republicans that have refused to play ball for 16 years now.
Harris did mention results on medicin prices, and ongoing work to improve that further. So isn’t it still a very obvious advantage for Democrats and their political goals that people are fed up with the lack of progress?

My friends and I plan on using it at work from now on.

🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh for sure, they’ve made some progress and there are a lot of D reps and senators who want to do much more, I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. But, the modern American public at large act like the president is some grand arbiter of getting laws passed single-handedly. Many ignore that it’s Congress that’s the most dysfunctional component when it comes to actually getting things done for the last two-some-odd decades. Hell, we have tons of people that chalk up the entire state of the economy on a single person every election cycle, it’s craziness.

Anyway, my point is that anyone that’s actually paying attention in good faith knows it’s almost entirely the GOP blocking healthcare reform. But, as we’ve especially learned these last 10+ years, many Americans don’t pay attention to reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I went on r/the_donald to check what they’re saying. The top posts were all about how biased ABC was. So yeah, they think he lost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

/r/the_dumbass still exists? I thought it was banned years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They made a reddit clone for themselves:

https://patriots.win/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That still exists?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

“Your system is so bad, terrible! Anyone can do better!”

“And yet you couldn’t in your term and still don’t have an idea how to do it even now? So you admit you can’t fix what you believe to be an easy problem to solve? That’s a weird stance to take during a debate you’re trying to win but ok.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I don’t think the MAGA movement is able to have realistic responses at this point.

This thing normal people can still do – “that was good, but we could do better”, or even “wow, expected much more than that” – would be impossible for MAGA. Any performance must be the best they have ever seen. Trump can do no wrong in the eyes of his supporters. Any room for improvement is seen as weakness.

The fact is, Trump could have gone out there and laid right down for a nap. MAGA would still say it was the best debate performance they ever saw in the history of the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think the MAGA movement is able to have realistic responses at this point.

They haven’t been fed the line to say by their favorite entertainment network.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I know a conservative mother who started the debate with Israel, abortion, and godly values being her main concerns. Godly values was the most important to her.

Before we even got to “concepts of a plan” she actually said she isn’t sure who is the best choice for the country. We stopped giving the tv our full attention when she said it was depressing her - we ended up playing cards games the rest of the debate so I didn’t react as much. But thankfully I got to chuckle live at the concepts of a plan.

I’ve been trying to avoid saying “weird” when talking about republicans. I don’t want right leaning folk to think I’m trying to buzzword them. But it’s really hard and sometimes I do say weird (was describing JD Vance’s eyeliner) but that kinda makes it worse because I’ll catch myself saying it and backpedal immediately and change the word (the eyeliner became ‘unflattering’ instead of ‘weird’) and they notice. And it feels like I have to protect them. Like… I’m not calling them snowflakes to their faces… But I’m loudly walking the proverbial egg shells.

This is why I had to say that “Concepts of a plan” was cute instead of weird. I ended up comparing it to my mother asking if I had cleaned my room, with me responding “I’ve thought about cleaning my room.”

All that to say… It’s hard for anyone with a good heart to enjoy Trump speaking. We made comments that Harris was obviously baiting him - but does that matter when he takes the bait? The immigration stories. The hate-filled eyes.

Trump is either a mean old man who is innocent. Or he’s a terrible liar - and truly a bad person.

It was a good night. I don’t know who she will vote for. But in 2020 I DID. When Harris addressed how you don’t need to abandon your faith to know the trump ban laws are wrong, it felt like Kamala was speaking directly to people like her

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Repubs are delusional cultists, so they think he did well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’m disappointed a little in Harris. She’s letting him get away with the narrative that she hasn’t done anything in the last 4 years.

I really wanted her to turn to him on immigration and say his fucking wall was in that boarder bill and he scuttled it for political points, drop the mic and walk out.

She won overall, but she could of hit a couple of those rebuttals out of the park for a walk off homerun…they were singles instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I’m disappointed a little in Harris. She’s letting him get away with the narrative that she hasn’t done anything in the last 4 years.

She was only the VP, though. Her job is to do the things the President lets her do, and break up fights in the Senate. VPs simply don’t do that much. She could (and did) bring out the accomplishments of the Biden administration, but that just called attention to the fact that Biden had to drop out, so she could only do it sparingly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Also, Donald “I have the concept of a plan, I’m not president” Trump probably shouldn’t be pushing that angle too hard

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I know the below doesn’t quite work since Biden dropped out before 8y but doesn’t it benefit the party for the president to give some higher profile jobs to the VP so the VP can campaign on those after their 8 year run? Maybe they wait for the 2nd term to be more beneficial, but it’d seem like a good idea for both terms in case something like this happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yes there were a couple of situations where she could have made him look like a huge idiot (more than normal), but she kind of dropped the ball IMO.
It’s probably easier to see from the outside, she’d have to be razor sharp to catch these opportunities real time.
Still she did well, and did catch him a few times, and made no serious mistakes.

But border security, healthcare and the idiot thing about emigrants eating pets, were all obvious chances.
We just have to hope enough voters know enough about the issues to see through Trumps lies and lack of policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

When talking about Climate Change, I was wishing Harris would say something like “Trump is 79 years old and won’t be around long enough to see the worst effects of climate change so maybe that’s why he doesn’t care anything about it…”

When talking about international affairs, I was wishing Harris would say something like “Trump’s chaos is going to cause an explosion of nuclear proliferation, but Trump is 79 years old and won’t be around long enough to see the terrible problems he is going to leave us…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Agreed. To me it seems like a mix of relying too much on her memorized prep and possibly a bit of the old Democrats “taking the high road” thing. She did well at baiting him, but less so at exploiting his openings I’d say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s a fine line to walk, between drilling deep into each of his faults and failures and presenting herself as the capable adult in the room – especially when his lies per minute are so high, he’s just spouting a firehouse of bullshit, and they’re limited to 2 minute responses.

I think she did a fantastic job of baiting him into anger and incoherence without seeming petty, and delivering her points concisely. Trump is a challenge to debate, not because he’s good at it, but it’s like trying to wrestle a pig – his only strategy is to drag you into the mud with him.

Even when she was muted, she got her response across very effectively with her facial expressions of disbelief, astonishment, and incredulous amusement. Her reactions where she didn’t even speak are already becoming memes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Check r/conservative for some great schadenfreude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

r/conservative

As in reddit?
🥵

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah. Morbid curiosity. I try to never look at it, especially that toxic sub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

She didn’t have to. The moderators did it for her on a fact check.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

No. They Republicans are thoroughly embarrassed and most of them are going to actually vote for Harris now. They are sick and tired of argregious lies and fabricated inconsistent stories and this really pushed them over the edge. They feel that racist fears of others as the sole platform for a presidency is tired and ridiculous.

If you are naive enough to wonder what their response is this far into the collapse of the GOP, you might as well go on believing this story; take advantage of whatever memory block you suffer from and at least replace your fantasy with something positive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
155 points

As soon as she said small crowd size and low energy people leaving early he lost it lol

permalink
report
reply
80 points

It was such obvious bait, I was a bit shocked that he took it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points
*

I wasn’t shocked at all (except the general shock that a person like this has ever come close to the presidency). Particularly in recent years, I’ve seen him take bait so many times which wasn’t even intended as bait, but it triggered him. And because it slightly grazed his fragile ego, priority number one for him is to go on an ego-defending tangent that only confuses and undermines any points he could have made about the actual topic.

Harris knew that as long as she peppered her responses with a trigger here and a trigger there, he would be unable to help himself every time. And that’s what we saw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Yeah I don’t understand how people are still surprised by this either. He is an unrepentant, raging malignant narcissist. He physically - biologically! - cannot resist defending his ego when challenged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The entire reason he ran in the first place was because Obama made a joke about him in a speech, and it embarrassed him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I’m more shocked that Democrats haven’t tried to bait him this way much before. It’s not hard to get him to prattle on about nothing while you look like the grown-up in the room.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“When they go low, we go high” 😑

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Really? You were shocked? Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

I’m still stuck on this thing about how undocumented immigrants are coming to America to eat dogs and cats, but in the process are being forcibly sent to American Prisons which are actually a front for experimental sex changing drugs creating a squad of latinas-who-used-to-be-latinos with the goal of sending them to dominate women’s sports, and the existence of transpeople like myself are an elaborate hoax to manufacture consent for this program.

Do I understand that correctly, that is actually what Donald Trump unironically believes?

permalink
report
reply
40 points

“THEY’RE EATING THE DOGS!” is quickly becoming a thing in my house. That’s how my daughter greeted me after school today

permalink
report
parent
reply

Haha.

A sticker of this should go on every gas pump in America.

Trump’s head with a little dialogue bubble…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Don’t forget that the immigrants are coming from insane asylums, and are not legal immigrants seeking asylum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s hilarious, he obviously literally does not know the difference between “insane asylum” and “seeking asylum”. He’s so goddamn stupid he thinks they’re the same word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Goddamn, I wish a moderator had called him out on that one. I didn’t realize he was referencing asylum seekers, and the humiliation as they explain it slowly to him would be wonderful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

By the millions! Millions i tell you

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

If the last person who talked to him was Stephen Miller, it probably is. To paraphrase George Burns, putting an idea into his head is like putting a basketball into a thimble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

putting an idea into his head is like putting a basketball into a thimble.

I’m so going to steal this expression!

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

He doesn’t believe anything he says. He doesn’t even hear himself. He’s like a poorly trained LLM at this point. It’s become so over tuned it’s only spews nonsense with conviction

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He doesn’t believe anything he says.

Trump has often bragged about how good he is at deceiving people. Anyone who thinks Traitorapist Trump believes his own shit has been Trumped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Man, I’d hate to sneak into the US just to chill and chow down on some cats, just to end up winning gold medals in woman’s sports

Would be super annoyed

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You forgot the part about how the trans surgeries are actually medical experiments to create an alien-human hybrid to prepare the Earth for the upcoming alien invasion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did he say that? I am going to have to watch this now. That’s fucking crazy

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

No, I stole it from the X Files.

But the notion that it sounds plausible compared to something Trump would say is really telling, isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Every accusation a confession.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Can I come to your prison? I would like to be a latina please 🥺💃🏽

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

All Trump proved is that he is the social media-addicted racist uncle everyone has in their family. That is what he demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“I saw it on television”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He can’t hold a thought that coplicated in his head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

The mood in r/conservative seems to be fairly in agreement with this headline. Kind of delicious to creep on lol

permalink
report
reply
37 points

You are far braver than I.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

But what’s the reaction on his propaganda platform with the hilariously tanking stock?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Hey cool, its price finally fell below what its initial offer price was. That’s the first time in its lifetime.

That’s still way, way, way too high. But still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s still way, way, way too high. But still.

You mean $8,000,000,000 was too much to spend to build a website comparable in functionality to Lemmy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well that part is not surprising, most IPOs tank. What would come as a surprise to me is if it climbed back up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I will never know firsthand, that’s for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I wonder what conservative@lemm.ee thinks. They’re an entertaining bunch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Sorry, I already showered today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Apparently they don’t want to talk about it. The only post since the debate is an unrelated article fearmongering about Haitian immigrants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The mod there is always doing that game where he winks about how the Democrats were the slave owners during the civil war, as if the numerous political realignments since then never happened.

I got banned yesterday for posting a speech by Lincoln where he was mocking slavers because they called themselves “conservatives” despite the fact that they wanted to break long-standing prohibitions and push slavery onto the rest of the country.

He apparently didn’t appreciate my demonstration that it’s always been ideological conservatives who are consistently weirdo fascist losers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Pretty quiet so far. Took a peek and the only posts in the last day are about Ohio and the influx of Haitian immigrants and one person asking what everyone thought of the debate.

So far, that post has two comments, the most upvoted one said Harris won and is the better candidate; the other with the most downvotes said that neither did a good job, that there was no winner, and that the American people lost in the debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

That’s great.

Here in my mixed political neighborhood, we have 3 houses with huge banners nailed to their fences, including a 40 ft long “FUCK BIDEN” one, a Christmas lights covered “Outlaws Trump & Vance” larp poster with them both in cowboy costumes and a few others.

We don’t talk to the crazy ones, of course. However the fuck Biden banner house has a really nice old lady in her 80s living in it, so very strange…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I went ahead and took the liberty of posting a query in there… and surprisingly the top comment (probably wasn’t a member lol) was in favour of Kamala.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol, no one “did a good job” at the debate? Great assertion neur, now let’s see you back it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The hero we needed

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just like Donald Trump is the “hero” our conservative friends deserve.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments