Well, luckily for the former president*‘s campaign, it wasn’t raining on Monday, when he grotesquely used Arlington National Cemetery as a campaign prop because, as we know, he gets a little nervous around soldiers’ graves in the rain, and he says things that require him to lie his ass off later. Most recently, of course, he devalued the Congressional Medal of Honor in favor of a bauble he draped on Rush Limbaugh and the wife of one of the sleaziest of his sleazy donors.

I think the bigger story is that someone from the cemetery asked that they not shoot photos/video of the section of the cemetery they were in, and then Trump’s campaign staff verbally and physically assaulted the cemetery staff.

So he has now disparaged soldiers at said cemetery, now exploited recently fallen soldiers laid to rest in said cemetery to try and cover for the prior disparaging (as well as the medal of honor), and then assault staff of said cemetery because they tried to stop them from exploiting the cemetery.

You know it’s a cult because it’s the only way to explain how veterans can look past his flagrant disdain for soldiers, and still stand by him while his campaign disparages Walz for his service.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

It’s not just that they were asked not to, it’s a federal law. So just add another broken law to the pile I guess?

Also, look at this statement from Trump’s campaign spokesperson. What kind of PR person talks like this?? Trumpism is a disease.

”…for whatever reason an unnamed individual, clearly suffering from a mental health episode, decided to physically block members of President Trump’s team during a very solemn ceremony."

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not just that, it’s also that a man assaulted a woman doing her job AND THEN their spokesperson had the audacity later to basically call her hysterical for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also, the staff member has refused to follow up on any charges, because they fear retaliation from the cult of 45.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ll give jack smith $20 to file charges

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

This one will get a few heads turned. Veterans dislike him screwing with vet care, but they can go either side will screw with veteran services.

Then pushing past an army card in uniform at a veteran cemetery, that will even piss off a significant number of his base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

cemetery staff

Who exactly is staffed at this cemetery? I’m honestly not sure…Ive checked a few news sources and can only find ‘an official.’ Are they active duty military personnel? Did trumps team assault a uniformed soldier? Why isn’t it being put this way anywhere?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

It involved the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier so it’s entirely possible. I’m honestly impressed the Infantry guarding it didn’t put the campaign staffers in the hospital.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I thought if you approach that particular monument, you get shot

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Bit of a mix I would guess. Civilian (GS federal employees) and Honor Guard “volunteers” from the various branches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

veterans can look past his flagrant disdain for soldiers, and still stand by him while his campaign disparages Walz for his service.

It’s absolutely shameful

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

My grandfather is buried in that cemetery. He joined the army to stop men like him from taking power.

The disrespect is palpable, he might as well spit on my Abuelo’s grave while he’s at it.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I’m really sorry, that is infuriating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points
*

Who The Hell Let Trump Into Arlington National Cemetery?

When you’re a star, they let you do it

Edit: I was 100% making a joke, but it seems to actually be that: https://www.npr.org/2024/08/27/nx-s1-5091154/trump-arlington-cemetery

When the cemetery official tried to prevent Trump campaign staff from entering Section 60, campaign staff verbally abused and pushed the official aside, according to the source.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

I think the question still stands. Who specifically let him in, because this was a failure of some sort of chain of command at the cemetery

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Per the Arlington National Cemetery’s site (which is a .mil TLD) states:

The Office of Army Cemeteries (OAC), consisting of Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia and Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery in Washington, D.C., is under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.

And when on guard duty, the greenest buck Private has full authority to stop the Secretary of the Army themselves if they refuse to provide identification and authorization for their presence at the posting said Private is guarding. So the correct and appropriate answer would have been to immediately restrain and arrest whoever was doing the pushing and intimidating, as well as any other shitass in the group who was trying to play fucky-fuck games like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Sure, but imagine being in that kid’s position. Not only would you be attempting to detain a man (the former Commander in Chief, believe it or not) with his own Secret Service detail, but you would likely end up with a bunch of unwanted attention and subsequent death and rape threats from Trump supporters.

How sad is it that this is what this man has done to American politics? That so many people still support this gutter trash, really showing their true faces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not a base though, you can just drive into Arlington National Cemetery if you have someone buried there. He came in with family so the people at that end didn’t have anything suspicious. It was probably luck someone was even nearby to notice the extra staffers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

do they have the authority to keep him out completely? they drew a line at the new section which is where the altercation was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I don’t know what rights the public have to Arlington but you could absolutely bar the equipment to do the photo shoot from entering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Another article says that federal law prohibits the actions the staff were, at that time, attempting to carry out. I would hope that a federal employee can enforce federal law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s a public cemetery, so I don’t take issue with him being there and acting respectfully. The problem comes when he uses it as a publicity stunt and gives the thumbs up when he’s placing the wreath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

It’s specifically against federal law to use military cemeteries for campaign purposes. Presidents often lay of wreath there on Memorial Day, but they’re already President and not campaigning.

We have enough issues in the US with glorifying the military for political purposes. Let’s not go backwards on this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

it is not a public cemetery it is military property

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

He’s trying to pretend he likes the military after all the shit the last few weeks.

The other day he did a conference at some National Guard thing.

He’s disgusting.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Imagine being (former or current) military, and voting for this clown. After literally, explicitly insulting you several times. Unreal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I can’t imagine it and I am former military. If he had done none of his shit up until now, this would disqualifying on it’s own. It’s hard to put into words just how sacred that soil is when you’ve watched coffins go into cargo planes at 3 in the morning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good faith question: what are the chances you are in a very small minority? How will military members who weren’t deployed into combat react?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In the picture from the cemetery is a guy with a leg prosthetic. If he is a purple heart vet… how could he not use his prosthetic to beat the man that insulted him and everyone like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Aw cut him slack, he looks great in a cemetery! I think he should do it more often.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I look forward to the day he becomes a permanent resident of one

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t envy the groundskeeper of that place. People will be using that plot as a bathroom for years.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments