Politico reports that it was sent communications from inside the Trump campaign, including Sen. J.D. Vance’s (R-OH) 271-page vetting file, allegedly by an Iranian hacker.

The outlet said that it has been receiving anonymous emails containing internal communications from the Trump campaign. The campaign acknowledged the authenticity of the communications on Saturday, accusing “foreign sources hostile to the United States,” for leaking them.

300 points

They got it through a fucking phishing email

HAHAHAHAHA

permalink
report
reply
212 points

Vance clicked on a link for hot CILFs in his area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points
*

JD Vance pays for pictures of dirty couches when craigslist exists smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

OnlyCushions

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Wait, just to be clear, does the C stand for Couches or Cetaceans?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

CILF omg that is delicioso

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

This is what most hacking is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Social engineering is the greatest skill a hacker can have

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Nope. It’s creating real looking email templates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I bet it was Eric. He seems dumb enough to fall for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Probably a fake OnlyFans link. “Oh I better pay my Onlyfans “invoice.doc” “

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Nah, it was claiming to be a coupon for a free hug from his dad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Is it really that farfetched to think that the people working for the Trump campaign are dumb enough to fall for a phishing email?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Time to add another item to the vulnerabilities list

permalink
report
parent
reply
134 points

The real story is not that Trump had a novel length document of everything wrong with Vance (we know he’s basically what you get if Oogy Boogy was filled with empty vapes and paternal disappointment instead of just bugs). No, the real story is that Trump picked him anyway.

permalink
report
reply
84 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Repubs are utterly corrupt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

When you “send your best” from a criminally corrupt pile of dogshit, you get the average republican!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe the conspiracy has something to do with why Thiel and Musk and others want Trump for president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Once the hamberders stop blood flow through his arteries they’ll have their personal puppet on the throne. The orange is unpredictable while JDV can be operated directly through the hand up his puppet hole

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

As others have noted Peter Thiel money might have influenced the choice. Given Vance’s relationship to Project 2025 (he wrote the foreword to Kevin Roberts’s book, remember[1]) it’s also possible he was a strongly pushed Heritage Foundation plant - put in place to ensure the flailing incoherent mess that is Trump’s mind is actually implementing Project 2025 properly when elected.


  1. 1 ↩︎

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Was it just a copy of Hillbilly Elegy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Vance had one job - do what Pence wouldn’t on Jan 6th.

Then, back in the fucking box.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Word!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Trump can’t read so the briefing they gave him was all pictures

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He was confused at seeing the Lovesac catalogue and said “sure! I already have a pillow guy!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not enough of him or Ivanka clones so he just dozed off and farted

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Tbf all the other candidates are also republicans. I’d pay just to find out how big the dossier of the alternatives would get.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But also opposition research is actually normal and prudent. Losing it is obviously not. But do we actually know how damaging the info is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Pretty sure a vetting document would have both negatives and positives, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Correct

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m more interested in knowing what the Trump campaign considers a positive…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s my understanding that the length is fairly normal. The vetting process for VP is very intense and thorough. They will go through every tiny aspect of your entire life if they’re doing their job well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points
*

Democrats also revealed that they were hacked. Iranians downloaded 2.3 terabytes of photos of Tim Walz hugging puppies. Secret documents as well. High School football plays and an old family tater-tot-hot-dish recipe.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Anyone got that tater tot recipe leak?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Turns out, he shared a tater tot recipe recently. Either it’s a coincidence or this thread OP is the mole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He knew he got hacked and he was trying to get ahead of the story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just going to save that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Come on guys, it’s nearly been an hour, we’re starving here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

putin got a copy of it and is examining it for inventing new methods of tort… cutenessless?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Clearly the football plays would assist Putins military commanders more than they seem to be able to manage on their own 🥸

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Iran should mind their own damn business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re so weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I seriously hope you guys don’t actually believe that a member of political class being pushed for position of power is a good person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Yeah, we all know that high school teaching attracts the scummiest people. The “political class” (whatever that is) loves toiling away for no money and no status.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

The most shocking part about this is that Trump’s team vetted JD Vance.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

To be fair, compared to Trump, nobody looks that problematic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The vetting concluded after a Bing search result.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I mean does trump even know how to read?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think that actually checks out. For mob bosses like Trump it’s not good if people are too clean. It means they could turn on them in the future. Problematic past is leverage and that means loyalty. How severe problems do you have to have to stay loyal to Trump longterm?

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

foreign sources hostile to the United States

Anybody who wants to stop Trump should at least be considered a temporary ally.

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*

Amidst a sea of Russian bots and trolls shilling for Jill Stein at the hour of need an unlikely force stepped out to bat for democracy: Iran. Partly out of spite it seems - which given Trump is the target can only be described as poetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It would be sweet if Iran became cool again. Old Iran looked like a somewhat good time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Don’t hold your breath. Their government is still as oppressive as ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean you could go to Dubai to simulate the experience. Or maybe Cairo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah I’m having a hard time feeling negative about Iran doing this when we know what Russia is up to. At least it levels the playing field a bit. Feels icky though!

Obligatory VOTE

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s no evidence for that yet either though. It’s just Trump claiming it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments