9 points

All joking aside, you have to assume they’re going to challenge her candidacy and eventual legitimacy in court. Debating her is not only politically ill advised, but also a tacit agreement that she’s a legitimate candidate.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

When has Precedent mattered to Robert’s Extreme Court?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly. Just because they don’t have a legitimate argument doesn’t mean they don’t have an argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Felon, pedophile, rapist, coward.

There are so many ways to describe this man

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Orange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

At least he admits he isn’t in the same class as her.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Even if Trump says no, Harris should at the very least discuss her opinions and views on camera. It could just be a single person question and answering, a debate other Democrats, or debating a third party candidtae if they don’t want to back other Democrat candidates. Leaving Harris a mystery is the worst thing Democrats can do.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Leaving Harris a mystery is the worst thing Democrats can do.

This is half the reason he doesn’t want to do it.

The other half is that "man yelling at clouds* might beat “well meaning elderly man with a poor memory” but doesn’t stand a chance against anyone who can consistently string three sentences together in a coherent fashion.

Having the debate would both make Trump look bad and make Harris less of a mystery and neither of those things helps Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Harris is a beast when she debates, too. She would mop the floor with that orange clown. Trump will simply refuse to debate her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

This is half the reason he doesn’t want to do it.

I really hope the democrats take full advantage of spinning that as yet another anti-democratic Trump move… that it’s anti-democratic to impede informed voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

She should %100 debate RFK. No one voting for her is going to magically jump to him…but people who voting trump might jump to voting RFK…plus she can show how scared the turnip is of debating someone who is semi competent

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why are we giving a man who had a brain worm and believes that Wi-Fi gives you cancer a platform?

This man was trying to be a spoiler for the Democratic party, extremely unsuccessfully. He does not have hopes of being president he has hopes of swaying moderates away from the left.

He is a brain dead Trump cultist. He never wanted to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

100% also call out how RFK is not a coward for debating Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Usually insane people are not cowards.

Do you believe that Wi-Fi gives you cancer? RFK adamantly argues this (while being around Wi-Fi constantly)

The guy had a literal brain worm that permanently altered him. It is disgusting that we’re parading is mentally ill man around as a spoiler for a political race

Just leave him alone and let him inject steroids in peace

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

This! Do the debate whether he shows up or not. It will expose him for being a massive pussy

I know it’s hard to believe sometimes but people are slowly realizing what he is. All of my Trumper family are now apolitical all of a sudden lol

Works for me!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

pussies are tough. he’s a ballsack: quite sensitive, shrivels up in cold weather, and prone to premature ejaculation

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

I would put so many commercials out there on fox “news” and everywhere else calling out Dementia Don for being scared and too weak to debate her.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Have the debate anyway and if he doesn’t show up put a picture of a chicken in his place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

His poll numbers woul just go up

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Can we make the chicken orange with a terrible hairpiece?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments