In her first campaign rally as the presumptive Democratic nominee to face Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris took aim at her Republican rival and a widely derided Trump-linked platform that provides a blueprint for the next GOP administration.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” she said in remarks from Milwaukee on Tuesday, just two days after President Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign and endorsed his vice president.

Harris, who secured enough delegate pledges to clinch the Democratic Party’s nomination within a little over 24 hours after announcing her candidacy, linked Trump to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-backed plan for his administration, and one that his campaign is now furiously trying to distance itself from.

“He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. We know we got to take that seriously,” Harris said. ”Can you believe they put that thing in writing? Read it. It’s 900 pages.”

The plan proposes cuts to Social Security and Medicare, tax breaks to corporations that will force “working families to foot the bill” and abolishes the Affordable Care Act, which “will take us back to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions,” Harris said.

-15 points

I don’t like her, but you have to admit that’s hysterical.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

Go get ‘em girl!

permalink
report
reply
-113 points

She seems to be doing fine, but she needs to watch out for acting giddy like she gets.

She can really act drunk sometimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points
*

If you think expressing any emotion other than bigoted hate and manufactured outrage = “drunk”, then you’ve been watching too much Fox News. Of course, it’s no surprise that the MAGA crowd just assumes that anytime a woman laughs, she must be drunk.

Keep it classy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

Come on man, do we always have to do the blanket denial? I’m voting for her, but she acts goofy as shit sometimes, not just “laughs a lot” or a woman laugh.

Lighten up, we can talk about things here, we’re among friends. Not everything is off limits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Women just can’t win huh. If they police their emotions and try to be neutral, they come across as bitchy and unlikeable like Clinton.

If they’re genuine and open about how they feel, they’re giddy and acting like they’re drunk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Unlike every fine upstanding male gentleman politician!

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

God forbid a politician enjoy life and laugh. I like how human she acts. It’s nice seeing a politician who knows how to enjoy herself

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think that actually works in her favor. She’s got a good energy, and it’s contagious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Ahhh yes, giddiness–the downfall of many great societies

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Remember when Howard Dean “yeeahhhharrrrgfh” ed? In excitement.

Glad we avoided that.

Remember when trump said “bing ding ding ding boom psheen pfoom”? To explain missile tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yeah, somehow Trump gets a pass. We can’t expect that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-78 points

What exactly is she getting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Your and the rest of the MAGA crowd’s goat, apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

'em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

More upvotes than your comment history, for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

More upvotes than your comment history

Wow, you weren’t kidding!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

My vote ❤️

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Them

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Let’s go! Kamala’s bringing a good energy to the table, I like to see it. I’m cautiously optimistic.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

First time in a long time I’ve actually been optimistic about the 2024 election. I generally vote for policy, not people. But I’d be excited to vote for Kamala Harris if she’s the eventual Democratic nominee. No doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

I definitely feel better having a presumptive nominee who actually seems to give a fuck about stopping the fascists instead of this idiocy:

I’ll feel as long as I gave it my all and I did the good as job as I know I can do, that’s what this is about.

Because holy fuck I was real fucking concerned he was going to sleepwalk us into a fascist government taking over after that shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
161 points

Did Biden ever even really talk about 2025? I’m loving that this is one of the very first places she goes and I hope she just presses hard on it non-fucking stop what’s in it

permalink
report
reply
-4 points
*

the heritage foundation has been putting out a project 2025 like document since 1980 and nearly 75% of all of the recommendations have been enacted by both democrats and republicans since then, including biden.

biden didn’t talk much about project 2025 because, if you looked into it, you’ll find that biden was a big proponent of the 1980’s & 1990’s versions of the project 2025; so it was politically advantageous that he pretended that it never happened and he never did it to ensure a distinction between him and maga stayed present in today’s political discourse. the same is true with gay marriage; lgbtq in federal service; student loans; segregation; feminism; etc. and i bet that’s why he dropped out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s almost as if career politicians aren’t great choices cause of all the baggage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I would just like to point out that this is an example of the tried-and-true rhetorical technique of shrugging off issues with a dismissive “that’s not new.” We see politicians and spokespersons do it all the time, because, maddeningly, it works.

But, it doesn’t actually matter whether it’s new, does it? Couple things: The Heritage Foundation has put out a similar document every election cycle for decades, but the contents have changed; this iteration could be (is!) much, much worse. Even if Heritage had been putting out the same plan all along, and we didn’t object then, well, we can still object now. We don’t have to keep making the same mistakes in the future just because we made them in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
108 points
*

Tell them their porn’s going away. Do it in the fucking debate. Do it pussy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’ll go back to their couches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

you could probably use vpn or whatever to get around that. i think it’s worse that they want to incriminate sex workers

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Unfortunately a large number of conservatives support that. Like how Mike Johnson has an app that tells his son whenever he’s jacking off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

How is that app supposed to work?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

TIL. This is weird as fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

No ballsmala?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Biden was too soft to mention it… Good thing he’s out of the race

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

As I said, Trump is totally ignorant of the Streishand Effect here. Which he used to tremendous effect before.

AND of his own strategy of “mention you don’t support something, repeatedly, as a sign you low key support it.”

Now he’s actually trying to say he doesn’t support something, and it’s like he’s totally forgotten his own history.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Everyone knows he lies like most people breath anyways. His only position is whatever gets people to cheer and clap for him so he gets his narcissistic fix, or the last person to talk to him that stroked his ego the right way. The people who will actually to do stuff in his administration definitely want 2025, and that’s what matters. I’m only a neighbor of the US but a country that implements 2025 is a scary one to be next to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m just gonna leave this here. It’s the low key support strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Saved

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.1K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments