Vice President Kamala Harris gave the public its first real look into her nascent presidential campaign with a stop at her organization’s headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware on Monday night.

Harris’ first applause line came when she discussed her background as California attorney general and as a courtroom prosecutor.

“In those roles, I took on perpetrators of all kinds,” she said, earning cackles while she beamed, clearly enjoying the joke. “Predators who abused women. Fraudsters who ripped off consumers. Cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So hear me when I say, I know Donald Trump’s type.”

13 points

Keep it punchy, don’t waste too much time bashing Trump or else the whole campaign is about him.

permalink
report
reply
-31 points

I hope they don’t pick her. She was repugnant when she had some power.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I don’t care for some of her positions, but would you care to elaborate how, or is this just some bullshit feeling stuff?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
5 points
*

Your own source disagrees with your black and white oversimplification

But what seem like contradictions may reflect a balancing act. Harris’s parents worked on civil rights causes, and she came from a background well aware of the excesses of the criminal justice system — but in office, she played the role of a prosecutor and California’s lawyer. She started in an era when “tough on crime” politics were popular across party lines — but she rose to national prominence as criminal justice reform started to take off nationally. She had an eye on higher political office as support for criminal justice reform became de rigueur for Democrats — but she still had to work as California’s top law enforcement official. Her race and gender likely made this balancing act even tougher. In the US, studies have found that more than 90 percent of elected prosecutors are white and more than 80 percent are male. As a Black and Indian American woman, Harris stood out — inviting scrutiny and skepticism, especially by people who may hold racist stereotypes about how Black people view law enforcement or sexist views about whether women are “tough” enough for the job.

She’s not two faced, she’s trying to make positive changes in a political climate that is biased against her. That’s far more nuanced than you claim. And far less two faced than her opponent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Look through their comment history… before you block them haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
291 points

she needs to specifically call out every single bullshit thing he’s ever done, starting from trump “university” all the way up to the catastrophic covid response, the ukraine phone calls, the stolen documents, and on and on.

she needs to dial it up to 11 and keep it there. it’s time to throw out this “let’s take the high road” attitude that’s accomplished exactly jack fucking shit over the last too many decades

permalink
report
reply
111 points
*

she needs to specifically call out every single bullshit thing he’s ever done

There isn’t enough hours left until election day to list all of it.

Also, maybe she should try another tactic than the one that BARELY worked for her predecessor the last time around playing on the much easier “people are experiencing how awful Trump is as president RIGHT NOW” difficulty level.

If she wants to win and win big (which is the only outcome that isn’t humiliating and dangerous for democracy), she needs more than “Trump bad”. She’s going to need some “Kamala good” to energize the base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

obama didn’t win because of “obama good” messaging, he won because people hated bush enough that the got off their ass to vote. similarly, it wasn’t “biden good” messaging that made him win.

when more people vote, dems win. that’s why republicans are desperately trying to disenfranchise, gerrymander, and otherwise suppress all the votes they can.

“kamala good” campaigning will accomplish nothing. she needs to make the people who are sitting on their ass angry enough to get up and vote. not FOR her, but AGAINST trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

People voted for Obama because they believed in change. Democrats can’t just win by making people hate their opponents. Democrats would have no agenda if all it took was making people hate their opponents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Obama is maybe the best example of making a campaign about you and giving people a reason to believe in you.

Not everyone cannot pull it off like he can though and Kamala is no Obama.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

obama didn’t win because of “obama good” messaging, he won because people hated bush enough that the got off their ass to vote

Either your knowledge of history is bogus, or you’re too young to have experienced the 08 election between Obama and McCain. Obama didn’t win ‘because people hated bush’, he won because he ran on the (now obviously bogus and intentionally vague) message of hope and change.

Obama literally won based on his messaging, so I hope no one listens to you on this matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

I’m all for it. Give me something to look forward to, not something to run from, for once this decade

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Fear drives people to the polls though. It’s kinda sad but true. So there needs to be a mix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

HOPE worked pretty well for Obama

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

she needs to specifically call out every single bullshit thing he’s ever done

The problem there is that there are so bloody many valid things to call him out on that it just turns into white noise if you just hit on every single one of them, and the message just becomes “Trump is a shitty person and a shitty president,” which has been said a million times already. Focusing in on high-profile offenses is a good way to fix specific examples in the public consciousness.

I’d also suggest something like “The Daily Trump ScumLog.” A video series where every day a new example of Trump being shitty gets called out in however much detail the medium allows. Every week, the spiciest gets edited for time and made into a commercial for wider broadcast. This would make it easier to focus in on specific examples, while still emphasizing that the list is Vast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“The Daily Trump ScumLog.” A video series where every day a new example of Trump being shitty gets called out

i dont’ listen to podcasts or watch vid series or any of that, but i would subscribe and donate to that one in a heartbeat

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Every fucking time he opens his mouth, she should interrupt him with “prove it”. Like, he says the sky is blue? Fucking prove it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

I doubt she wants to spend 12 hours listing off Trump’s shitty behavior and crimes. Ain’t nobody got time for that.

And anyone who doesn’t know about what a piece of shit he is by now probably won’t listen to it anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Naw, she’ll just rattle it off like a summary of charges: “115 counts of lying directly to the public, 14 counts of ignoring the CDC during a pandemic, …” Short, pithy, with all the bite of a courtroom prosecution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

…listing off Trump’s shitty behavior and crimes.

New filibuster strategy just dropped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

She got off to a good start already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There’s no low road here. That dude’s in a submarine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Pity it’s not the Titan

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

She needs all 8 years just to finish the list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

“Biden may have accidentally called Zelenskyy Putin. At an open meeting, but Trump likely calls Putin ‘boss’ in hidden ones”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think you meant “daddy.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s just impossible. It would take a small army of staff to compile his catalogue of lies, and Harris doesn’t have the time to recite it. What she needs to do is grab him by the pussy. Drive home that he is a felon, a rapist, and that he himself is willingly raped by Putin, that he is owned by bitches and he is a bitch. She needs to leverage her biography as a black woman to utterly humiliate him. To deeply wound him. To haunt him with the eventuality of his incarceration and inevitable end as a failure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m waiting for the “abortions after birth” challenge to the lying coward treasonous pedophile rapist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Sometimes Biden’s mental decline wasn’t capable of challenging

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Hell yeah. I like to say that when they go low, kick them while they’re down there!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And let’s jump to the debate. I want to watch her turn him upside down and use his head as a mop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

And a wapist and a wobber.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

“Maiwage is wat bwings us togevuh today. Wove, twue wove…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Who? Him? He’s not the Messiah. He’s a very naughty boy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“How shall we fuck off, O Lord?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Nice. Keep up the good work.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments