You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

That’s all well and good that FDR said his goal was to have everyone have a living wage, but the minimum wage didn’t do that. A full time minimum wage worker in 1940 would have rent consume 50% food 35% which leaves 15% for clothes, medical, hygiene, & utilities. It was barely enough to survive on and many people had to forgo necessities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

I think people forget until Reagan came into power, living in poverty was normal for many people. I think people don’t realize the difference between growing up in the 70’s and current times. In the 70’s we wore hand me downs, had old cars, didn’t eat out, rarely went to movies and my father was a union auto worker who made more than most. Poverty was just a way of life.

Now everyone expects a huge home, new cars, new cell phone, new iPhone, etc

It isn’t that wages are not adequate, the expectations have changed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Source on all your statistics and values. I provided an original source from the FDR library of speeches. I went out of my way to give you an accurate source as possible.

Now your turn. Don’t pull anecdotal numbers from your ass that you vaguely remember. Provide a real, verified source.

You seem to think people had zero money when that was implemented. Do you think it’s better today? Minimum wage covers nothing. Rent on a house is over the amount minimum wage pays.

edit

You said “minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage”

I said “never INTENDED - factually false”. He absolutely intended it.

You now saying all that other stuff is irrelevant, moving of the goal posts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

https://drexel.edu/hunger-free-center/research/briefs-and-reports/minimum-wage-is-not-enough/#:~:text=Though often considered the baseline,over the following 71 years.

Though often considered the baseline of livable wages, it is important to note that even when it was first created, it did not represent a true living wage.

So when it was created. It wasn’t a living wage. I’ll tell you another secret. Politicians say one thing and do another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Like when Trump claims he knows NOTHING about Project 2025, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Source on all your statistics and values.

Average rent 1940 $27 per month

https://ipropertymanagement.com/research/average-rent-by-year

Food costs

https://www.thepeoplehistory.com/40sfood.html

Meat $6 per month (1/2 lb per day) Eggs $1 per month (2 dozen) Bread $0.40 per month (3 loafs) Fruits $2 per month (1/2 lb per day) Vegitables $2 per month (1/2 lb per day) Milk $1.50 per month (2 gallons) Cereal $0.35 per month (2 boxes) Flour $0.05 per month (1 lb)

Total $13.30

You seem to think people had zero money when that was implemented.

Where did I state that?

Minimum wage covers nothing. Rent on a house is over the amount minimum wage pays.

Never made the claim that it was.

You said “minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage”

I said “never INTENDED - factually false”. He absolutely intended it.

Do not judge a bill based on what a politician says judge it on what it actually does. At the inception of the minimum wage it was below a living wage.

You now saying all that other stuff is irrelevant, moving of the goal posts.

I’m judging minimum wage based on results not the propaganda spewed out of a politicians upper oriface.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are you struggling to read?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Goalpost moving in action. The quote in my previous comment was that it wasn’t intended to be a living wage. Just take the L, dude.

Whether it was the intention or whether it was the effect are two separate threads of discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The evidence that minimum wage was intended to be a living wage is that FDR said it was. Have you started believing everything a politician says?

There is no external evidence to support FDRs claim. Looking at the Fair Labor Standards Act contradicts his claim, $0.25 an hour is not enough, the act passed easily and $0.35 could have been set if they wanted to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Quite a stretch to argue because minimum wage didn’t fulfill its intended goal on day 1 that wasn’t the intention….

permalink
report
parent
reply

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

  • 897

    Monthly active users

  • 405

    Posts

  • 2.8K

    Comments