There is no external evidence to support FDRs claim. Looking at the Fair Labor Standards Act contradicts his claim, $0.25 an hour is not enough, the act passed easily and $0.35 could have been set if they wanted to.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com

7 points

4 months ago

Quite a stretch to argue because minimum wage didn’t fulfill its intended goal on day 1 that wasn’t the intention….

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

jimbolauski@lemm.ee

-5 points

4 months ago

Minimum wage never fulfilled its claimed goal. FDR had opportunities to make minimum wage a living wage but never did, the very next year minimum wage was raised to $0.30 per hour, still below a living wage.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com

7 points

4 months ago

Minimum wage never fulfilled its claimed goal

I’ll agree with you there.

Politics are gonna politic, and there’s always going to be someone against something, even if I’d seems like a no-brainer.

In the case of minimum wage though, that’s all the more reason to push to expand it, not just give up because FDR didn’t get it perfect the first time.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

jimbolauski@lemm.ee

-5 points

4 months ago

Politics are gonna politic, and there’s always going to be someone against something, even if I’d seems like a no-brainer.

If the intent was a living wage then why did FDR champion the $0.25 bill instead of the AFL backed $0.40 bill? He had veto proof majority for its passing. The politics was pretending minimum wage wage was intended to be a living wage.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com

7 points

4 months ago

Because politics is just as much about cooperation as it is about passing legislation.

What you’re leaving out is the veto-proof majority he had was a result of compromises due to opposition from Southern States and previous attempts at similar bills being struck down by the Supreme Court.

https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/flsa1938

$0.25 is more than half of the AFL backed $0.40 figure you gave, so considering he had to compromise to appeal to the minority AND Supreme Court it’s actually not a bad floor.

Once again, just because it wasn’t the ideal amount on day 1 doesn’t mean the original intent was a lie. What a dumb hill to die on.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

892
Monthly active users
406
Posts
2.8K
Comments

Community stats

Community moderators