Original post: https://bsky.app/profile/ssg.dev/post/3lmuz3nr62k26

Email from Bluesky in the screenshot:

Hi there,

We are writing to inform you that we have received a formal request from a legal authority in Turkey regarding the removal of your account associated with the following handle (@carekavga.bsky.social) on Bluesky.

The legal authority has claimed that this content violates local laws in Turkey. As a result, we are required to review the request in accordance with local regulations and Bluesky’s policies.

Following a thorough review, we have determined that the content in question violates local laws in Turkey, as outlined in the legal request. In compliance with these legal provisions, we have restricted access to your account for users.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
155 points

Funny as I got downvoted to oblivion for saying Bluesky was not really decentralized.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

A decentralized service like Mastodon will have the same issues when governments are knocking on the door. The turkish government totally can force all those small turkish instance admins to defederate instances who are not reacting to legal threats. And all those small admins don’t have the resources to fight a lengthy legal battle against their own government

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

The flip side of that is that instances large and small outside of the influence of the government can do as they please and people can use other means, like VPNs, to access them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

That’s the entire point, right? Just use an instance that’s in a country that’s not closely allied with Turkey. Everyone knows that, right? Right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Based on the comments, I’m not so sure. Louder for those in the back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Blue Sky isn’t in a country that is closely allied with turkey. They could have totally ignored these requests but then Blue Sky would have just been banned in Turkey

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

But they can use some other instance. With centralized platforms the issue is that they want to do business everywhere. Russia threatened to arrest Google employees in Moscow, for instance. Even without such threats, they want to have access to local markets. That isn’t a concern for some instance in Ireland that is supported by donations.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Sure, maybe if that instance is hosted in that specific country. But an instance outside of it doesn’t have to do shit. What is Turkey gonna do if they don’t like something I post? Come arrest me? Fucking let 'em try.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not the same problem but it would still be an issue

But it would give consumers control and transparency

Right now we have none. They see you, they realize they don’t like you and they make the algorithm disappear everything you say

That is a problem. And I agree with others, it needs to be decentralized, that is step 1. The other things cannot even be attempted until then

Corporate driven communication will just not work. They are in bed with the fascist Nazi regime

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The tech needs to be decentralized like Bitcoin. Bitcoin is untouchable as it is just so decentralized. You can go after nodes and miners, but you would have to go after all of them to take down any of its content. It is very resilient and social media could go the same way but people have to want it first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Hard agree. Decentralization itself doesn’t really work against censorship, you need an additional layer of privacy, or, more ideally, anonymity. Is there a way of running a lemmy instance over Tor?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Decentralization isn’t done to hide the author, federating content works because the content is spread beyond a central owner. I don’t know if you ever used a peer-2-peer network like you do when you torrent a movie, but the concept is very similar. It is harder to censor something because you have more places you need to censor.

Imagine you are in a country where a lot of information is censored and you want to spread a message. Would you pick 1 giant billboard in the city center or would you make a bunch of leaflets you secretly hand out to someone you trust, hoping they will give the information along to someone they trust etc? Obviously, one giant billboard is easier to take down by the censoring government. That is why decentralisation does in fact work against censorship.

Anonymity or ‘layers of privacy’ are useful if you don’t want to be caught as the author of the message. In that case it is not about running the instance over Tor, but accessing the instance over Tor. You wouldn’t even need to use tor if you can trust your computer isn’t infected and you acces the instance through a VPN and remove all new data (e.g. cookies) from your pc before you disconnect your vpn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The content is still accessible, just not via the official Bluesky servers from that region, with content addressing and signatures you can even be certain that mirror sites haven’t modified any content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Where are those alternative servers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Currently, you have stuff like Clearsky (it’s basically an archive.org for bluesky)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So, just like Twitter, then? When the official servers don’t show whatever the government tells them not to show?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yup

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I sort of feel like that’s not really relevant. How would being decentralised make any difference, the government would just go after the server owners regardless of who they are. If the server owners didn’t honour the takedown requests turkey would just ban the server IP and no one would be able to access.

Federation isn’t a solution to every problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

How would being decentralised make any difference

You sign up on a server that isn’t in Turkey and doesn’t give a shit to respond to turkish demands.

Now turkey can only control the servers that are within it’s countries, and has to submit requests to ALL of them rather than just one. And even then can’t remove you from the rest of the federation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Right but my point is they would just submit the request to the host server. If the original is taken down then all the federated service will lose the comments as well.

If the host server just straight up ignores turkey then they’ll block all servers that host Mastodon and say mastered on is a rogue element. Better you just remove the offending comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is easily solved with the god damn onion address support which is in lemmys own documents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But Turkey blocking acces to certain content is not the same as removing the content (which is what Bluesky does when they honour a request).

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If it was truly decentralized it would be like Bitcoin that has not been brought down by any government or organization yet they sure have tried.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I know it sounds insane but I swear to god BlueSky has astroturfing accounts on Lemmy. Every conversation (including yours here) about BlueSky is met with countless Sealions either saying it “will be federated soon” or asking “Why does federation matter?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Centralization is going to do what centralization does best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hope those downvotes were not from here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The only thing i did was follow anime artists(same popular ones i follow on twitter that started switching to bsky)and block weird accounts that had furry/beastalility(idk why they kept showing up) coz i selected the art tag as interest . but after a few weeks of banning furry shit my account got banned… No reason why . but maybe an admin/staff saw i blocked them and retaliated ? This was last year when bsky was new. Fuck it. At least mastodon is still used

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 227K

    Comments