You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-7 points

And then came the “but” to show she just said the first part to avoid being attacked by the press and his supporters.

Besides, “finding common ground” with racists on race issues is just less overt racism.

Unlike his “racial jungle” comment, which was completely overt racism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Doesn’t pass any fact check i found.

Methodology: literally searched “biden Harris racist factcheck” and linked the top results. Come on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Yeah, all of those assumed that she was being genuine rather than just covering her ass. Not always a good idea when dealing with politicians, and almost never when dealing with her specifically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well seeing how often you misrepresented the truth in this thread alone, forgive me if I don’t side with your assumption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

she just said the first part

That’s certainly one interpretation, especially if you want to put words into people’s mouths to fit your narrative.

Here’s another interpretation: when Kamala said that she doesn’t believe Biden is racist, it meant that she doesn’t believe Biden is racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It’s common knowledge that “everything before ‘but’ can almost always safely be discarded as disingenuous” and this is one such case.

I’m not putting any words in anyone’s mouth, I’m just disregarding the disingenuous ones she used before talking about Biden’s racism affecting her negatively as a person of color.

Here’s another interpretation: when Kamala said that she doesn’t believe Biden is racist, it meant that she doesn’t believe Biden is racist.

It’s kinda adorable how you automatically assume that a politician known for pretending to be a progressive and than doing a sharp turn to the right to become VP is being genuine and employing no artifice in her big prepared debate zinger lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Source: made it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Nope. Just following the logic of “everything before the ‘but’ is usually disingenuous” to apply to an otherwise self-contradictory statement from a notoriously disingenuous politician 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Just following the logic of “If Kamala doesn’t confirm my bias, she must be lying.”

And her statement is not “self-contradictory”. She thinks Biden said hurtful things in the past but she doesn’t think he is racist.

Frankly that could apply to a lot of white people. So if you don’t understand how she can truthfully say those things, that’s on you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not at all.

We need to go to the store, but let’s hurry so we can get back home.

She is very talented, but she is also very modest.

The weather was cold, but the scenery was beautiful.

The movie was long, but it kept my attention throughout.

I mean I could go on and on. If this is the one thing your holding into turn you’ve got nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 88K

    Comments