You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-114 points

This is 100% about them feeling entitled to the Muslim vote and Jill being tied with Harris in polling. The fraud AOC is lashing out because someone is legitimately a threat to them staying in power.

This is the bed Harris decided to make for herself, and if she loses it will be her fault.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

Jill being tied with Harris in polling

LMAO

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

See also:

legitimately a threat

LMAO

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The same way Nader was a threat to Gore.

And that seemed to work out well for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

The more you read, the funnier it gets 🤣 what a mook

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points
10 points

What the fuck is “cair”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

I’d like to see your source on that polling data, champ. Also, it’s so funny you fucks turned against AOC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Obviously they meant “tied for the Muslim vote”

https://www.cair.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/CAIRMuslimVoterSurvey.pdf

This data is echoed by FiveThirtyEight

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

That doesn’t fit the narrative in this echo chamber even a little bit. <strawman> <gaslight> <ad hominem> <logical fallacy of your choice> <accusation of bad faith>

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Obviously they meant “tied for the Muslim vote”

It wasn’t obvious, it was a line constructed in fantasy and intended confusion. IAnd the way they argue and respond gives me hardcore troll vibes. These people are here to sow distrust, confusion and despair. In line with a country known for doing this kind of thing, russia.

Tankies = Green Party

It really is as simple as that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not obvious

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Yeah, right? AOC is a bad ass until her party is suddenly unfavorable because some of them but not her aren’t supporting Gaza hard enough. But unsurprisingly, none of these people ever complain about Uyghur genocide—the other Muslims.

It’s easy for Jill to be hard on this topic because she knows the presidency is out of her reach. But AOC is still in play, and sadly—in the actual world we live in—she has to play the game to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

But unsurprisingly, none of these people ever complain about Uyghur genocide—the other Muslims.

You know who else doesn’t complain about it? Other Muslims, because they know it’s bullshit.

https://twitter.com/un_hrc/status/1578003299827171330

#HRC51 | Draft resolution A/HRC/51/L.6 on holding a debate on the situation of human rights in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of #China, was REJECTED.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

It’s ironic to me that you people can acknowledge that Jill Stein is just virtue signaling from the side lines because it costs her nothing. She’s not actually spending political capital on something that has any chance of happening. She’s just paying it lip service.

You understand this. That’s good.

But then in the same breath, you applaud AOC for saber rattling to pack the supreme court and other ideas that are impossible without a super majority. Which only served to make Biden look weak and disenfranchise progressive voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-43 points

AOC has always been garbage. As requested

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

She’s also tied with Hugh Janus in polls. It was a real official poll. My source is Trust Me. I am not a troll.

Adding /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

LOL yes I think that went well over the heads of some.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 215K

    Comments