Progressive film-maker says he’s more optimistic than he’s ever been since Trump announced first run eight years ago

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

Shit, am I OOTL? i like NDGT, but should i not? Did he do something shitty?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

He’s conceited and refuses to admit that he could be wrong because his views are based on science, ignoring that they’re just his interpretations of it. This is a good example:

(He did apologize for this)

But to tweet something with the connotation of “gun violence isn’t that bad” while ignoring half of the gun violence stats in your own list, and ignoring that there can be multiple problems that can be solved at once (guns, mental health, car dependency, etc.) isn’t the best. I don’t think he’s like objectively a bad person, he’s just overconfident and IMO annoying. He does communicate science though, so props for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks for the larger picture

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Always happy to disappoint :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He’s overly interested in kissing himself in a mirror. Nuff said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Conservatives got mad that a black man was publicly pro-vaccination, started a smear campaign, and anti-intellectualism took over from there for the brainless masses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

He was also key to demoting Pluto from It’s status as a planet, even though Pluto was

  • predicted and then searched for
  • found orbiting where they expected it
  • and then found to have a moon
  • and then found to have an atmosphere

What the Lowell Observatory says…

But hey, NdGT didn’t like it. So we all changed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Pluto was always bullshit. it was clearly an outsider, and it’s shares characteristics with tons of other bodies in the system. so is Pluto is a planet then the solar system has numerous planets and there’s barely any point in knowing about them at that point.

tbh i think the only reason it was even “important” was because it was the only one discovered by an American. also it was predicted because of a faulty calculation of mass of Neptune, so it was a lucky guess more than an actual informed prediction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Either Pluto is not a planet, or we live in a solar system with 200-1000 planets.

So either 8 or +200, but it will never be 9 again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Pick a size. Get away from judgement calls. This big or bigger is a planet. Smaller is not. Done.

No weird rules. Make it a diameter of 2000 km. That’s no more random than anything else. So we’d have 10 planets, with Eris and Pluto being the new ones. NO BIG DEAL. It’s measurable. We see something new, we know what to do with it. None of this dwarf planet thing, which isn’t a thing btw. We already had planetoids. Renaming for renaming’s sake. It even sounds like the IAU isn’t sure or unified about this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s not what makes a body a planet though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What’s the difference? Enlighten me!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I just wish people would stop talking about Pluto like it fucking matters, or they care at all, what it’s labeled as. I’m so sick of people pretending to be (or even worse, actually being) upset that they changed its classification.

It has to be one of the most irritating memes and it will just never die.

“Hurr durr, I was taught one thing in science class 25 years ago, so that means it is and will always be true.” Clearly they missed the entire point of science.

Why the fuck would you get “nostalgic” for something so meaningless and banal? Do people think this is some kind of rare occurrence in science? Because I’ve got some news for you…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks Neil!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 184K

    Comments