“Even if this motion is successful, it doesn’t mean that Luigi Mangione walks out of prison,” said Ron Kuby, a criminal defense attorney whose practice focuses on civil rights. “All it means is that the items that were seized from him, or seized that belong to him, can’t be used as evidence against him.”

Kuby thinks that Mangione’s team has made enough claims in their papers to merit a hearing on the issues, in which the police officer involved would have to testify, confirming or denying the facts. “It does appear that they stopped and frisked Mangione without a legal basis to do it. If that’s true, everything that follows from there is likely to be found to be unconstitutional,” he said.

Reddit tries to suppress all discussions related to Luigi, but remember, we have a dedicated community for him: !luigimangione@lemmy.world

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Luigi was a wakeup call as to just how heavily information can be censored when it affects the powers at be. I really don’t know what to believe anymore. It feels like there’s no objective reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Guy is going to jail, the grave, or both. Guilty or not the state is not letting a little thing like police evidence tampering or innocence get in the way of him paying for the consequences being brought home to that CEO. Truth was publicly spoken to power, and someone has to pay for that in the states eyes.

permalink
report
reply
86 points

Luigi is an innocent patsy. The cops planted the evidence on the first convenient person they found.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

The cops planted the evidence on the first convenient person they found.

Hardly call his arrest a convenience. They had to chase him halfway across Pennsylvania.

I’m open to the possibility he was set up. But only in the Lee Harvey Oswald sense (someone mired in radicalism who was tangentially involved). You’re going to have to produce a “second gunman” before I toss the abundance of evidence against him as a fabrication.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’m not particularly remarkable in my looks, and I have so many doppelgangers that people are CONSTANTLY walking up to me claiming that my name is literally anything other than what my name is. I don’t believe this is at all a unique feature of my particular genetics, I just happen to have a face that is known as a “familiar face,” within both the art and acting sphere, as well as the psychological and sociological spheres of influence.

I’m saying that this concept absolutely applies to Luigi Mangione. He just looks too distinct, and quite frankly too chiseled to match the fuzzy photos of the actual killer. This being an extremely high profile case, in which the investigators involved felt pressure to wrap the case up as quickly as possible most likely led to them grabbing the wrong person, and planting evidence that the real killer abandoned on Luigi.

Pennsylvania isn’t particularly big, and it’s literally next door to NYC. You can either go directly from PA to NY and drive into the city from the north, or go through New Jersey. It takes longer to go north, but I think it is a better drive, TBH.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He just looks too distinct, and quite frankly too chiseled to match the fuzzy photos of the actual killer.

Sure, because his mug shot isn’t a fuzzy pixelated photo.

the investigators involved felt pressure to wrap the case up as quickly as possible most likely led to them grabbing the wrong person

If they have the wrong person, it should be fairly simple for Luigi to produce an alibi to explain that he wasn’t in Lower Manhattan at the time of the murder.

Pennsylvania isn’t particularly big, and it’s literally next door to NYC.

It’s enormous. 44k mi^2. And he was halfway across it when he was arrested. Again, if he’s innocent, and they just grabbed a random guy out of a random diner in flyover territory, and the guy has a long, established online presence and a penchant for selfies, it shouldn’t be hard at all to say “My cell phone tracking data proves I wasn’t anywhere near Brian Thompson at the time of his death.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

remember that TIP, they baited the people to ID him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They baited people to find anyone that might look like the shooter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s kind of how locating a suspect works… How else do you locate someone from a description when they have fled and are hiding in the general population?

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

[removed by reddit]

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Nice

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You be careful posting that stuff! Reddit will ban you like they did me! Edit: See they removed your post!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This ^

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I feel like they had more than enough reasonable suspicion, and that the evidence they found on his person are also very much relevant to the case so it should be presented to the Jury to help them make their decision.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Why do you think they had reasonable suspicion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Match the physical profile, matched the outfit, matched the face, probably smelled like he hadn’t showered in 2 days, just got off a bus from New York carrying a backpack full of cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They knew he got off a bus from New York and that his backpack was full of cash? By the fact that he was sitting in a mcdonalds?

And he didn’t match the outfit, just similar. You think the cops from around the us were justified in searching anyone white in a hoodie because someone in New York did something?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 323K

    Comments