153 points

Shouldn’t have fucked those kids.

permalink
report
reply
102 points

Shouldn’t have fucked raped those kids.

FTFY

permalink
report
parent
reply
-79 points

So we have 22 per hour upvoting OP and and 8 per hour upvoting logic, WHAT THE FUCK

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Top-level comments always get more votes than replies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Omitted variable bias? Did you consider decline of votes over time as post ages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m always on the fence with these subpoena resistance cases.

On the one hand, it’s Twitter, Elon, and Epstein related. Fuck all of them.

On the other hand, I don’t think that businesses should just blindly turn over information because the DOJ managed to find a judge that would rubber stamp a subpoena. Obviously that’s not every subpoena, or even likely a large number of them in the grand scheme, but it happening even once is too much to take it at face value being justified.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

His Fifth Amendment rights are still protected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

This subpoena has nothing to do with the DOJ. This subpoena was issued as part of discovery in the civil defamation case between the two women in the article

Most likely what I think is happening here is X literally does not have the records that are being subpoenaed, because why keep records when you’re trying to destroy a business?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

100% agree. I do love the irony (hypocrisy?) of it all though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Tell me you also fucked kids without telling me you also fucked kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think they’re saying Elon sucks and be wary of trusting the government.

The fed’s anti-encryption stance comes to mind. “We need backdoors in your messaging apps but it’s just to protect the children!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Both of these have been true for a looong time. Any step to concede this point is complicit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

For the life of me I don’t understand your argument here. You’re basically advocating for the destruction of the justice system? So if I try to sue a company for say bodily injury or something they should be able to hide all the evidence? Good lord don’t corporations have enough power as is? Why give them more?

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

those subpoenas feel nonconsensual Elon?

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

What if the DOJ gives him a horse?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This obviously changes everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

May he rot in prison.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

THAT explains why he all of a Sudden Endorsed Trump! Because Trump, who was BEST FRIENDS with Jeffrey Epstein until Epstein bought a Bigger Mansion, definitely would NOT Protect Elon Musk if it was found out Elon Musk was Raping Kids on Epstein Island!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

ok donald time to take away your phone for the night

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments