68 points
*

Obama, Pelosi, Schumer and 2/3rds if Democrats want him out but he’s refusing like an old man whose grown children are trying to take away the car keys before he hurts someone.

Unlike those grown children, Democrats don’t hold the same love and care for grandpa to force them to grow a pair of balls to know that it’s in everyone’s best interest and force the issue to pass.

“Most important election in my life” my ass; all that they have to do is stop helping a genocide and they would win, but no.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Most important election in my life

Nothing else at stake here other then his election apparently. Can’t help but think about that press release where he blurted out “how do I make this not sound self-centered” before answering why he was wasn’t stepping down. Ouf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think at this point it’s because the DNC is going to shove him down our throats anyway with their expedited digital vote next Friday so instead of causing even more disruption by throwing a wrench into that at the absolute last minute which will cause bad optics for Democrats, they’re just resigned to losing entirely.

“Funny” thing is people keep saying “the rich are safe so they don’t care if we lose to a fascist.” and they couldn’t be more wrong. I don’t for one second think Trump isn’t going after the DNC as well as the party itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

“Funny” thing is people keep saying “the rich are safe so they don’t care if we lose to a fascist.” and they couldn’t be more wrong. I don’t for one second think Trump isn’t going after the DNC as well as the party itself.

i think that we’re on track to repeat history and the last time this happened the rich either fled or switched to facism to protect their wealth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Bribery is legal now so the rich think they’ll just bribe it away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You were doing okay until the genocide thing. I doubt the “genocide” even enters into it for most independent voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think it’s foolish to chase “independent” voters (which I assume you’re saying to mean the mythical “moderate”). What Biden is fighting is apathy.

Joe Biden being unwilling to call out the genocide in Palestine absolutely drives apathy among voters who feel disenfranchised by the current two party system.

If the Democrats truly cared about winning elections, they’d court the left and drive voter engagement. If we drive up turnout, the Democrats win every time, even with the ridiculously broken electoral college.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just who the fuck do you thing you are using history and logic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

None of those apathetic voters ever have an answer to how Trump will be better for the Palestinians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Those apathetic voters that would vote for donnie or not vote at all, and all over the “genocide joe” thing, should give pause and ask themselves how they are helping the situation by assisting donnie.

As for the independent voters, I’m talking about the low-information voters for the most part in this instance. The kind of people deeply influenced by optics. Optics like donnie getting nearly killed, then raising his fist for a photo op. Or optics like #BidenSoOld, Biden cancelling a speech for Covid, Biden bombing at a debate. I’m not even sure most of these people know or remember that Gaza is happening. Just like when Biden was going on about NATO. Again, it’s doubtful these low-information voters care much about NATO. I doubt even high-information voters place NATO as their number one concern…

(In other cases, when I say independent voters, I am usually referring to what the Republicans typically call themselves when they don’t want to admit they are voting for tools like Bush and donnie)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is a public statement. Privately, he’s been saying much different things

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

is there a place i can go read up on it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Wow. So the user that does the lion’s share of the posting on news/politics on lemmy.world (from what I’ve observed) states his confound knowledge of the private conversations of POTUS. The very same lemmy.world that has an overwhelming amount of posted coverage of democrats urging Joe Biden to step down, to an arguably oppressive degree. Without a replacement even considered aside from VP Harris. Four months before a presidential election. With the known American attention span. Smells awful.

For the love of all that is holy, vote blue in November to avoid immediate Fascism and CONTINUE to press for our rights and dignity as human beings!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Four months before a presidential election. With the known American attention span.

You do realize that those two facts mean the opposite is what you imply in your comment, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Im not privy to any secret POTUS convos. I’m just stating what I’ve read in the news.

I don’t mod on politics, so I can’t speak for them, but the content on Lemmy seems to reflect the content I’ve seen in media coverage

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Tell me the plan that gets more unified support than the current president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Anything other than the current president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Dems trying to start the campaign over from scratch with someone else this far into the year is just stupid. It’s giving the election to the Republicunts and they’re salivating.

They shouldn’t have had hm run in the fucking first place and been able to actually plan a campaign. This is so fucking amateurish it’s pathetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is a good example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not a plan

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Name literally one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

no one knows the right answer but we all know what the wrong answers are because we keep doing them and here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

They don’t have one and even if they did Biden is the best chance of winning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Democrats are about to get fucked hard, and their hubris did it to them

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I mean…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

You mean, like in 2016? No. Surely not. No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

We all know there is no one they could run that would make you happy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I would vote for anyone. I would vote for Biden, but very much do not want to. If they put someone else in there who wasn’t also a fascist, then I’d vote for them. The problem is that Biden is not doing very well and is being a shit by not listening to anyone around him. Democrats are fucking retarded because this should have been happening 2 or 3 fucking YEARS ago. The Democrats are incompetent pieces of shit who are also the only thing keeping this country together. They need to behave like they actually know how to govern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That’s correct, the party as a whole do not represent the working class. I would speculate most democrat voters agree but feel trapped in the 2 party system and would never vocally discuss their dissatisfaction for fear of being ostracized by their peers.

Case in point, the other reply to yours

Edit sp

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

So tell me, again- how much do you think you’ll accomplish by doing nothing? Additionally- when in history has doing nothing helped a situation like this? I’d love for you to name an event. Just ONE event in history where not voting brought a positive change. Because by not voting, you’re essentially saying you’re okay with things the way they are and are willing to let chance dictate the lives of others.

And tell me again how you want age restrictions on candidates. If you had your way- We’d never have even had a shot with Bernie. And he’d be retired.

You can cry all you want that the system is broken, but at the end of the day- it isn’t going to be changed by a bunch of blowhards staying home and whining on the internet.

Oh, and lastly:

If we’re going to be judged on how people respond to us, you probably should delete your account and find something better to do with your time. Because it seems you spread a lot of misinformation and troll quite frequently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Biden himself literally said at least 50 democrats would win against Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The clown I responded to admitted that the democrats can’t run anyone they’d vote for. So what Biden says or does is irrelevant. They even admitted to being here to actively convince people not to vote.

They’re essentially here to get Trump elected- intentionally or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Kind of a rock / hard place situation.

If they “force” him out without him dropping out, by faithless delegates or somesuch, it would reveal the entire process of selecting candidates is actually a meaningless farce (which everyone already kinda knew, but no one seems very interested in dispelling that myth just yet).

If he won’t consensually drop out within the next week I don’t see how they get rid of him without it being an even bigger clusterfuck.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It’s already a clusterfuck. The only question left being how long it’ll take to play out

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Alright this is getting fucking ridiculous. If he won’t exit with dignity then just 25th amendment his ass.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The Dems don’t want him to exit. They have the means and they know how to use it, so wanting to force him on us has to mean that it’s what the party apparatus wants, which is really just what their rich and corporate donors want

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Maybe, but if Schumer, Pelosi, and Schiff are all working to get Biden out, I assume at least a sizable chunk of the leadership wants him to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

add obama to that list but it doesn’t seem to matter; he’s dead set

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They are ostensibly working to keep them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For who?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Harris. Obviously. That’s how the line of succession works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Harris polls worse than Biden by quite a bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Also, I think Biden might be doing a good job at “party unity” - in that, a lot of the party seems to be united in him not being the 2024 candidate.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments