Joe Biden has reportedly become more open in recent days to hearing arguments that he should step aside as the Democratic presidential candidate after the party’s two main congressional leaders told him they doubted his ability to beat Donald Trump.

While continuing to insist he will be the party’s nominee in November, the president has reportedly started asking questions about negative polling data and whether Vice-President Kamala Harris, considered the favourite to replace him if were to withdraw, fares better.

The indications of a possible rethink come after Biden tested positive on Wednesday for Covid-19, forcing him to isolate for several days while curtailing a campaigning visit to Nevada that had been part of a drive to show his candidacy was very much alive.

It also coincides with fresh polling data showing that he now trails Trump by two points in Virginia, a state he won by 10 points in 2020.

161 points

Open the convention.

All the news coverage about who the democratic nominee will be has been and will sap the life blood of Trump’s campaign: coverage.

When they aren’t paying attention to him, he becomes ever more unhinged and his mask slips even more.

Chaos in the democratic party can work for us for once.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

100% agree with this sentiment. 1 day debate, 2nd or third day, delegate vote. Imagine a national conversation where the cornerstone is about the policies of the democratic platform. Compare them to the policies of the GOP. That will be a huge W for the party, especially down ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Imagine a national conversation where the cornerstone is about the policies of the democratic platform.

They are decided by major donors and superPACs, not conventioneers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah but they could pretend for a bit, just for the cameras.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Harris/Kelly

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Harris will absolutely lose this election worse than Biden.

Let’s see Whitehouse or Warren or someone else that is focused on issues young Americans really care about. Our platform should be consumer protection, workers’ rights, or climate change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Absolutely not. Elizabeth Warren would violate the one rule about replacing Biden, no more old people! She’s great, but she’s 75.

Also Harris actually polls well. Her, Whitmer, and Newsom are the big names and they’re all in their 50’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You’re overlooking reproductive rights which should be a huge deal this election and imo gives Harris a bump ya’ll aren’t considering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

See this is an issue because it’s going to end up being harris and people won’t be happy hopefully they still support whoever though. I think most people are on the same page though

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

I do wonder how a Kamala Harris / AOC ticket would go.

Probably not well given how racist and misogynistic this country is. But it would energize many people.

permalink
report
reply
61 points
*

Few things would energize me more. Biden would have gotten a begrudging vote from me at most. If youre going to slot AOC into the VP pick, I will estatically take 4 years of Kamala. To me there are few if any better investments in the political health of the country than VP AOC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Few things would energize me more. Biden would have gotten a begrudging vote from me at most.

same here except i vacillate daily on voting for biden due to his history and its impact on my life.

a candidate that doesn’t have a 4 decade long history of anti-gay, anti-feminist, pro-segregationists, pro-corporate, anti-student policies, actions and votes would easily convince me to vote democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So electing Trump is good for working class queer women of color students?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think that would be too far left and you’d lose centrist votes

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Vote blue no matter who? Or was that phrase just a cudgle against progressives?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

You do realize there’s more to the electorate than just dedicated Dem voters, right?

Just because we’ll be telling people to “vote Blue no matter who” doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s a lot harder to shame centrists into doing the right thing.

Progressives have to stomach what they know is best for the country, even though they don’t think it’s good enough.

Centrists by definition aren’t committed to what’s best for the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You can want a very Progressive candidate and acknowledge that you need to win the middle of the electorate in first past the post voting systems at the same time

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As always…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Bingo. AOC is a no-go for way too many.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

A charismatic younger candidate pushing progressive policy improves voter turnout, otherwise what did the Dems learn from Obama’s first election despite not being a big national name before running?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe among MAGA supporters who were going to vote for Trump regardless of who gets nominated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Possibly, but would those centrists flee to Trump? He’s already got the racist vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Kamala and Bernie

Let Bernie in the oval office. Nobody deserves it more than him. He’s too old for pres, but God damn would he get shit done between inauguration as vp and his grave…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’d be perfectly happy with that. I’ve even got a cat named Bernie Sanders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

AOC has time. If I were writing the script, I would go with Harris/Whitmer, followed by Whitmer/AOC. Assuming each ticket wins two terms, AOC would be in her 50’s then and be one of the most qualified candidates in 2040.

Can you imagine three Female Presidents in a row?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s quite the fantasy but no major party has held the presidency that long without the other major party literally falling apart.

It would be awesome, but don’t count on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Or right now while she is still young, relevant, and still gives a flying fuck. You always strike while the iron’s hot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not quite old enough I think? I checked and I think she turns 35 this year. Not sure how the particular rules apply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

She will be 35 before inauguration so shes eligible to be president which is the req for VP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think that’d make her the youngest ever. Added bonus to being the first all-female White House, I’m in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

She would turn 35 before taking office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would vote for that ticket in a heartbeat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They would never run together lmao they’re total opposite ends of the democrat spectrum

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You could also view it as they’re the perfect way to get the conservative Dem votes and the progressive votes. And since the conservative Dem would be the presidential candidate, the owner class is more likely to permit it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

If it happened it would have a good chance to work. But I just don’t see someone as progressive as AOC ever getting picked to be the VP with someone as neoliberal as Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s kind of what you want in the WH. Two people who think the same things the same way don’t make for good leadership.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Obama administration seemed like pretty strong leadership and Joe and Barack seemed pretty aligned

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

I’m really worried about his campaign and white house staff at this point. It seems like it took the in person interviewers telling him about the bad polling. Like he looked genuinely surprised to hear about it.

If that’s true they need to go. We cannot have staff that lie to the president.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Staff fudge the truth to bosses all the time. The issue doesn’t lie with the staff because it is the boss’ responsibility to understand the power disparity and do their best to mitigate it.

The way to do that is have a small contingent of 2-3 people who will ALWAYS tell the truth to the boss no matter what.

But again, that willingness to hear the truth and have those people around starts with the boss. And if they just want yes men around, that’s what will happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Not even counting the debate the man has straight up asked for people that have died during press conferences and mixed up Putin and Zelenskyy. I don’t think it’s out of line to question how much of policy and press releases he’s cognizant of, much less staffing decisions. Even if they are updating him about polling data he may not be processing it. I have a 94 yr old grandpa with a live in nurse and a 80 year old aunt in hospice (different sides of the family) and the disorientation is disturbingly familiar.

It seems insane to bet that he will have 4 more high pressure years to give. Or betting on him making it long enough for a VP to take over. RBG should be a warning, not a template.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It appears at this point that US presidents have this problem more than half the Roman emperors.

(Just remembered reading about Julian)

EDIT: I meant - Julian had people follow him who’d tell him when he was making a mistake, and he’d always listen and take time to think. While for him it was more real than for other emperors (some of whom would still do the same), I even wonder whether jesters in European courts are some perverted continuation of such a tradition. Perhaps at some point pointing out mistakes came out of fashion, but scolding the monarch - still a tradition, and then it turned into a way of have fun, and such a follower, and not the monarch himself, took the role of the fool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

this was exactly the purpose of jesters. a link.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is on Biden, not on the staff. The calls for him to drop out were ALL OVER the place, including popular media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No. This is on the team, not just Biden. Being surrounded by people who won’t tell you the actual truth would make most of us blind to real issues. As people on the left, as voters in general, we need to stop pointing fingers at a person and begin pointing fingers at the processes and issues that cause bad individuals to be placed in positions of authority, and the reasons why the teams behind even the good ones may not wish to speak out. This is systemic and mass recognition is the first step to a solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

it took the in person interviewers telling him about the bad polling.

lmao what the fuck? No it absolutely was not, it was all of the high ranking sitting dems like Schiff, Pelosi, Obama.

interviewers? polling?? Jesus fucking Christ.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Okay? The point is, why was this needed? What are the people around him telling him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

If Harris was super serious about beating Trump, she couldn’t pick an easier race than a run with Bernie Sanders. Imagine how energized the left would be. Ahh.

…In other shit that will never happen news, Trump enjoyed a joke at his own expense at a salad bar.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

…In other shit that will never happen news, Trump enjoyed a joke at his own expense at a salad bar.

That was fucking great

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Look, I get that Bernie is beloved and all, but I don’t think replacing an 81 year old on the ticket with an 82 year old is going in the right direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All the same, it would restore a lot of goodwill toward Dems that was lost about a decade ago.

Ahh shit I’m old. I’m mad about stuff from decades ago. I guess I need to figure out what metamucil is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like others have said, a geriatric VP is a lot better than a geriatric P

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Get AOC as speaker of the house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh, ok, so I guess we can all vote third party now and you won’t complain?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Whitmer / AOC 2024. This time it’s personal.

“In a world . . . “

permalink
report
reply
11 points

One can dream

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think it would be awesome to watch trump get his ass kicked by ‘that woman from michigan’ while I don’t always agree with Whitmer’s approach, there is a reason she keeps getting reelected in a state that can be heavily Republican leaning. I think she’s a pretty smart cookie but I also haven’t dug into her political history deeply yet. I’d rather her than a few others, but I guess we’ll see how things play out.

(filter tag: #uspol)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The midwest has always been pretty centrist at least within living memory, usually split right down the middle. It only ever gave the impression of heavily republican leaning because they’ve been gerrymandered to shit. Wisconsin in particular has been ratfucked by redistricting - both a democratic governor in 2018 and Biden in 2020 won because those are state wide votes, but as of 2022 the state legislature is 66% republican while only having won 53% of the popular vote in that election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

nvm

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

She’ll be 35 a month before the election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She’ll be eligible, but not qualified. But after tRump, I guess anyone is qualified. She could handle it… but it won’t be her this time around. I’d rather her get it in the 2030s.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 198K

    Comments