6 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Washington — The federal judge overseeing the case alleging former President Donald Trump mishandled sensitive government documents after leaving the White House has dismissed the charges against him.

This is a developing story and will be updated.


The original article contains 37 words, the summary contains 37 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

So I read more, in the end…

permalink
report
parent
reply
277 points
*

Oh, suddenly she can move quickly on something when there’s political cover to do what she actually wants.

Unbelievable corruption. And the liberal media is going to be tripping over themselves to talk about this like it’s some complicated issue, rather than straightforward political corruption.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

This sounds like a constitutional question for the Supreme Court, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

Absolutely, we know that they will decide based on the time-honired precedent of which side provides the biggest RV as a “gratuity”

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

John Oliver offered a pretty big RV but Thomas didn’t take him up on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points
*

The “liberal media” is not “tripping over themselves to talk about this like it’s some complicated issue”.

The Washington Post called bullshit:

U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon’s ruling is a remarkable win for Trump, whose lawyers have thrown longshot argument after longshot argument to dismiss the case. Other courts have rejected similar arguments to the one that he made in Florida about the legality of Smith’s appointment.

Cannon’s decision comes as Trump is preparing to be formally nominated as the Republican presidential nominee in this year’s election, with the Republican National Convention beginning in Milwaukee on Monday.

The legal theory that Smith was illegally appointed and funded has generally been considered far-fetched. Trump’s legal team didn’t adopt the argument in court until conservative legal groups pushed it.

This is as far as they can go in saying that “this decision is unhinged” while still maintaining their aura of objectivity. They’re not going to do it explicitly in the main article, that will come in the opinion pieces that will be released in a few hours, surely

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Nowhere do they explicitly connect this to her political ideology. That’s exactly my point, they’re soft-selling it.

The liberal media (no quotes needed, they’re corporate neoliberal) refuses to actually call a spade a spade.

This is not a critical article, this is just them shrugging and being like “Oh, well, it seems like tenuous grounds for dismissal but thems the licks.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

Without intent to offend, perhaps neutral reporting isn’t for you. They reported all the facts and leave you to come up with your own opinion, which is a mark of high-quality journalism.

They are a news agency. They are not here to tell you what to think of the news. You want your news to tell you what to think. I want my news to tell me what happened and give me the information necessary to form my own opinion.

If they said explicitly or implied that she did this because of her ideology, even if that is likely true, that would not be unbiased.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Maintaining an aura of objectivity” is itself blatant pro-fascist bias!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“objectivity” is bullshit and will end up getting hundreds of millions of people killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

That should be reversed in about a week.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Should.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Should is such a funny word isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Only the naive expectation is different from “ought to”

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Supreme Court will get around to this right away I’m sure. Like, next June. Super fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nah the circuit court in FL going to slap it down. Then scotus can do their corruption afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I envision the higher courts slapping it down a few times, then an eventual appeal up to the supreme court, who then if four justices are willing to go along with it, put the whole case on ice until next Summer while they argue this. Just like they did with the January 6th trial and presidential immunity rulings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

And then reversed again when the Extreme Court gets a hold of it. It must be nice to have your criminal cases decided by justices you’ve appointed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Supreme Court is on recess until October.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

The autocratic dictatorship is imminent and I don’t have a current passport. Not sure what the future holds.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

You and me both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Run for local or state office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And get killed by maga crazies

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Arm up, particularly a pistol, apply for CCW. The right will continue their stochastic violence and seemingly random mass shootings, targeting poc and lgbtq. Go vote for gun control absolutely, but your votes not gonna save you when someone storms a mall and starts spraying because they’re part of a violent cult. I promise you the right already has their guns, they’ve been passing them down to their kids too. The most strict gun control even if enacted tomorrow won’t dis-arm these would be shooters. You’ll have to wait for those effects to happen over a longer period of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A vast majority of Democrat representatives live out their lives without getting killed by MAGA crazies. I think most of them though are willing to take that risk for what they believe in. Do you believe in something greater than yourself that would prompt you to take that risk?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If push comes to shove your passport is only the first step. You would need to actually find a country to take you, and countries don’t hand out citizenship like candy unless you’re rich. Without a second citizenship, you would be very restricted in where you can work.

Your best bet is if your parents or grandparents came from abroad, some countries have blanket policies to have 1st or 2nd generations come back to their ancestral homeland. It very much varies by country, you would have to do your own research. It might be worth doing as a last resort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I may look into the other genealogical direction. My daughter has skills that are globally in demand and she’s probably more upset about America than I ever could be. Maybe there’s a bring your parent along program out there somewhere.

I’m fifteen years out from viable retirement. If I can hold on that long, there are several places I could go on my own accord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
333 points

I’ve never seen someone get so many free passes for the stuff he does.

permalink
report
reply
221 points

This is less a “free pass” so much as all things going to plan.

Cannon is a trump appointed croney who has been delaying the trial and doing everything in her power to protect trump. And now the supreme court gave them an out and she instantly took it.

This is literally what republicans have been working toward for decades. Immunity by corrupting the government at every level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

Doesn’t it kind of feel as if this has reached some sort of end game here? Previously, it has always felt like - yeah, they play dirty, but they keep their bullshit contained to reasonable levels. But recently, it’s just been one absolute blatantly democracy-shattering decision one after another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

America is fucked, because nobody rises up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

There’s been a concerted effort to infiltrate and influence politics by conservative Christians for years. I think events like the Brook Brothers riot emboldened dropping the thin veil of the Democratic process as they saw you can literally steal an election and no one will do anything about it. The real test of what the people will tolerate is only beginning, I fear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Well, yeah, because they think they are confident in the outcome now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Because we played right into their hand, the have been telegraphing this for years. All of their bullshit has been slowly ramping up for years, slowly getting more unreasonable but compared to everything else they’ve done it’s really not that much worse. Now that they were able to completely set the field they can move on the they’re end game. And I’m not sure we can stop them now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Yes, because they are a) at the tipping point where they control enough institutions so the pieces fall together now, and b) someone came along who’s actually used all those pieces and everyone could see how absolutely unprepared and completely helpless the system and the political opponent was. They realized they don’t need to tiptoe around anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

Honestly for a long time I was really hopeful that the fact that he was doing it out in the open and everyone could see that he was abusing the hell out of every little loophole he could find, and creating some new ones, would mean that we’d start closing those loopholes when he was out of office and we might even see an era of reform.
He’s been out of office for 4 years and all the courts have managed to do is LEGALIZE HIS MISCONDUCT! I feel like I’m finally starting to except our collective fate and now there’s nothing left to do but watch it burn down around us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Yeah, thought the same.

And it’s not only that, a few things occurred or are in the midst of happening ( at the worldwide level ), that i was sure wouldn’t be possible, because no one would do that shit and/or people would not let it happen.

But, boy was i wrong…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Most governments around the world and their politicians regularly get away with even war crimes. This isn’t anything new.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 109K

    Comments