The vice president told a crowd of roughly 20,000 in Dallas that former President Donald J. Trump had said he would terminate the Constitution in a second term.

“Consider: Donald Trump has openly vowed if re-elected he’ll be a dictator on day one, that he will weaponize the Department of Justice against his political enemies, round up peaceful protesters and throw them out of our country and even, and even and I quote, ‘terminate’ the United States Constitution,” Ms. Harris said.

114 points

Those points are only alarming to intelligent, sane people. The problem is there’s a cult of unintelligent, insane people in this country.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

If the media focused on just this narrative half as much as the focus on Biden’s age, which is an issue, it might actually reach enough ears enough times that the not lost people might be swayed. There aren’t enough people and headlines referencing Trump’s felonies, rapes, and views to dictate. I saw a few headlines when it was said, and people just said, “same old Trump”. More people need to start speaking about it in the media as a serious matter. And literally continually refer to him as a rapist felon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They just need a particularly ragebait-y conclusion to latch on to. Like the fact that the Constitution he wants to ‘terminate’ also includes all the amendments.
Including the second amendment.
The one that’s misquoted constantly by republican gun nuts.

The title nearly writes itself. “Trump wants to take away your Second Amendment gun rights!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

He has literally talked about bypassing the 2nd Amendment.

Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but** take the guns first, go through due process second**. - Donald Trump

This is an actual quote from a White House meeting discussing the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

People who already would vote Democrat need to be alarmed into making sure they vote their asses off

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well we can only vote once, though, legally

Some MAGAs got caught trying to vote twice last time

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes we can only vote one time but we can also make sure our moms, dads, siblings, friends, mail carriers, etc all go out and vote as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And they’re people that pledge allegiance to the flag and Constitution every morning

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Trump wants to be a dictator.

permalink
report
reply
-40 points

Then why didnt he do it last time?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Did you miss out on Jan 6th?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

So dictators just give up power when they are told to?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Dismantling two and a half centuries of checks, balances, and protections isn’t half as easy as you may think.

The jury is still out on whether he’s capable enough to do it if he wins again. This said, who the fuck wants to take that chance?

Trump is also a selfish, amoral piece of shit that will pull us out of NATO and kowtow to Putin as he expands across Europe. He doesn’t care about anyone but himself, and the foreign countries and businesses he’s forever indebted to.

The only “upside” to this guy is the delusions he’s selling his fanclub on. They’re all lies, but America is infested with enough idiots that we’re now having to deal with this situation.

I’m so ashamed of this segment of my countrymen. What absolute rubes Trump voters are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

If he is going to destroy the government why even bother with an election and just say he is permanent president? And of course you are flying the Ukraine flag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-51 points

The Democrats think the donations that will bring in are going to be excellent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-58 points

Which is somehow different than Biden refusing to give up power and drop out despite no one wanting him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Yes! Amazing both sidesing a man that wants to end democracy with a senile moderate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

Except the part where Biden is no moderate, and several of his policies, he’s been to the right of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Probably going to be the new dem nominee

permalink
report
reply
41 points

I mean, realistically we knew it four years ago…

Its why we kept trying to argue Biden needed a better VP. But moderates told us VPs don’t matter.

I can hold my nose for Kamala, but fuck man. If there ain’t a real primary next election I’m over the party.

I’ve voted D for president for literally 20 years now…

08 was the only time I didnt just vote against the Republican party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

If the DNC doesn’t take this as a wake up then I don’t know how we’re going to avert catastrophe. But I can already see another primary in 2028 with no challengers because the DNC scared them all off to protect the incumbent democratic president. And I’m not sure what happens with 3 sham primaries in a row.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How was 2020 a sham primary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They don’t care. They’re all corporate removed anyway, they’ll thrive under Republicans, except for the few of them who do actually care and would be too noisy.

Those who voted for them are the ones who should worry – those whose existence and well being actually do depend on Republicans not being in power

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pls no.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck that. She’s been nearly invisible and very quiet. Definitely doesn’t exude strength.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

And when she does talk, it’s nothing but word salads, SNL worthy

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Nice of her to show up finally.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

For real. I’ve been saying that since 2020. What the hell has she been up to? I heard more about Mike Pence during his tenure and I got the feeling he was trying to stay out of the spotlight most of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I just have no faith in her ability to beat Trump. She’ll do worse than Biden ill bet.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

I’m worried it will unite the sexists and racists behind trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Pretty sure they’re already there.

Are we really gonna chase them as a constituency?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Dems have been chasing them to the bottom of the barrel for some time now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

More like they’ll actually be motivated to show up at the polls or not throw their vote away on Joe Exotic because they’re threatened by women of color.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No, more like I’m worried we will motivate more to show up at the polls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

they were already united.

this is about mobilization and harris may be able to bring a wider, deeper pool of voters to the polls. I can tell you, where I am, there is absolutely no fire or enthusiasm for biden and we will miss warm bodies at polls pulling D levers because of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’re already voting for trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol as if sexists and racists are voting democrat

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

There are a lot of people that don’t realize they are sexist, or racist. They are surrounded by people that all also don’t realize they are racist, or sexist but they will start finding all the flaws in them. They won’t say "I don’t trust a woman as president " but they will coincidently find other flaws in the person because they are involuntarily being more critical of them.

The point is, there are racist and sexists voting for Biden that wouldn’t vote for Kamala. They just don’t realize they are sexist.

I live in rural Arizona. I am essentially an expert on these types of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh they exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I will assume you’re a clever fellow and not a fuckwit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah that’s a big concern too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

I don’t know. One thing that she’s really good at is going on the attack. Go back and watch her in Senate hearings. If there’s anything we need post-Biden, it’s someone who will take the fight to Trump instead of bickering with him about golf and letting him control the narrative. Assuming that she hasn’t let those skills atrophy in the interim, of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t know why this is so hard, I care very little about her as a person. Biden is mostly at the whim of his party already and Kamala would be too. So the platforms remain nearly the same, but somewhat better on critical things like Gaza.

I don’t see how this is a loss for the dems to run her, they’re guaranteed in my mind to lose with Biden now. And you’re right, anyone who gets on stage and is younger than 65 against Trump will just trounce him. I was waiting for Biden to fight back just once against Trump but nope, he just sat there with his mouth open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

She’s not senile and Biden is basically winning on a platform of not trump so I can only imagine she’ll do better. The people don’t like Biden, they dislike trump. No one currently in the running is anyone’s first choice and pretending otherwise is just madness, so someone who has the advantage of not being fascist and not being senile only sounds like an improvement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Same here. But it’s not a lack of faith in her, it’s a lack of faith in Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think so. She’s no Joe from the 2012 vp debates, but she’s also no Joe from the first 2024 presidential debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Don’t trip over that bar on the floor

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Fuckin tell me about it

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments