9 points

But Flying Squid said it was irreparably damaged with crack seepage or whatever

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Why are you lying about what I said?

Is this an example of positivity and productivity, the things you claimed I lacked?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s stone. Stone is full of cracks. It will get into those cracks and not wash off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Interesting that you aren’t linking to where I said that. Perhaps it was because I said it in the other thread yesterday and not today after I read this article and found out I was wrong?

Is it that you’re being highly dishonest or is that just my negativity and lack of productivity that made me lack psychic powers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think you’re getting attacked because this post is an accusation, first and foremost. It definitely doesn’t feel like it is positive or productive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well that certainly gives people an excuse to tell ridiculous lies and take things I said out of context, doesn’t it?

I mean people are saying shit like I claimed to be an authority. When? Where? I didn’t do that.

And I did say I was wrong, but apparently that makes things even worse somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That is what I was hoping to hear.

And I still say doing a stunt that even makes it look like you’ve done some real damage to Stonehenge right in the middle of a religious festival does not make you look like the good guys. People in another thread said it spread awareness. Who isn’t aware? I’m fully aware of climate change and there’s fuck all I can do about it.

But at least it was not permanent vandalism.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
  • Who isn’t aware?

Like half of the world is in denial.

How would you spread awareness that translates to action?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Denial is not lack of awareness.

I don’t know exactly how I would spread awareness, but I know exactly how I wouldn’t: Making people think I damaged a beloved ancient monument during a religious festival… a religious festival, as someone else pointed out, for people who venerate nature.

How about, as an idea, paint bombing Shell Oil headquarters?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They tried that in 2022. It got fuck all news coverage. The fact you don’t know is exactly why they jumped it up to things that would get them in the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Industrial sabotage is whats needed at this point imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Clearly, a good portion of the population isn’t aware of how serious the situation is, it’s still an election issue.

If the right level of awareness was reached, having any kind of oil money around you would be a political death sentence. Instead, Trump has public bribe meetings with oil execs and his base grows because of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Ok, now please explain, since no one else will, why pissing people off is a good way to achieve that.

Have you ever convinced anyone of something by pissing them off?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t know… oil companies piss off lots of people when they cause oil spills…and yet they’re rolling in profits day in and day out.

Maybe these protesters are trying imitate how oil companies behave since its works so well for them?

Damage the environment and make money if your an oil CEO. Temporarily color stone henge with zero damage and everyone loses their minds. Kinda backwards if you ask me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Why are you more angry about a stunt that did no damage than you are about actual ecological damage done by oil companies for profit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The message is that people care more about non-damaging vandalism to famous objects than they do about climate change which will cause irreparable damage to many of these same objects, be it through hazardous weather, rising seas, or global conflict.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

MLK advanced civil rights by being a nuisance. Gandhi pushed Britain out of India by being a nuisance. I’m sure there are others.

It is in the nature of protest to be disruptive. It has to be. If it isn’t, it gets ignored. Climate change is getting ignored. What would you rather they do, go deface an oil refinery? That’ll just get them arrested and the news suppressed. Big public displays that can’t be hushed are the only way to make sure your message reaches the world. These folks have been considerate enough to make sure that message didn’t permanently damage its canvas. I don’t know what more you could ask from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They said the same about woman and gay rights movements. You can’t make noise, block traffic or even talk about it without pissing people off.

Not to mention most of the anger is manufactured by oil execs and then enabled by people with little to no proper reasoning skills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not only did they decide to do it in the middle of a religious festival, they did it in the middle of a festival that’s part of a religion that worships nature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

and there’s fuck all I can do about it.

Sounds like maybe you are lacking some awareness around this issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Okay, you tell me exactly what I’m supposed to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Lots of things but the easiest would be to find local orgs that have already developed political strategies relevant to your local political context and work with them. They can fill you in on the rest.

Climate change won’t be addressed until there is a much larger movement that can flex serious political power. Think civil rights movement—that’s the kind of organizing we need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Maybe do some labor and figure it out yourself instead of trying to pawn that off on everybody else???

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

If you’d been paying attention, you’d know it wasn’t permanent from the get go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was paying attention. That doesn’t mean I don’t wait for experts to say that it really isn’t permanent.

Unless you are assuming the environmental protesters were geologists and familiar with whether or not things like getting into cracks would make a difference at Stonehenge. I don’t see a reason to make such an assumption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

They said it was orange corn flour all along, and they have a history of not actually damaging anything but using the appearance of “damage” to make a point. Corn flour is a very simple, inert substance. You’re actually demonstrating the hypocrisy that this group is trying to highlight - more concern over something like corn flour damaging these rocks than the damage done by millions of barrels of crude oil extracted every day. Where’s your outrage over acid/micro plastic in rain that falls on these stone every week? There will be new species of moss that grow on these rocks, or pollen that blows on them from invasive species, possibly damaging them as the climate heats up - are you worried about that? Why can folks summon outrage over something inert that touched a famous rock, but not for destruction of the actual biosphere? If Stonehenge is that fragile, why are people allowed anywhere near it? You’re more than welcome to disagree with them, but if you spend more energy complaining about Just Stop Oil than you do complaining about actual oil companies, you’re actually just supporting the oil companies.

https://professortorberts.com/shop/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

People care more about the old rock placement than the actual air that we breathe today.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

All that hand wringing over what kind of protest should be ok, you guys are exhausting. The kind of protest doesn’t make a difference at all. A lot of people will say it’s unacceptable no matter what. I’ll even admit sometimes a protest misses the mark, but I’m still glad they did it.

The kids are alright

permalink
report
reply
-12 points

How would your reaction have been if it wasn’t a cultural artifact creating by Europeans? Say they did it at Native American site or Aboriginal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

it wasn’t, though.

Perhaps if you could name the site, the protestes, the cause and the method we could go “Yeah that would be much/slightly better/worse” but I don’t think we’d get much more out of it than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

As a european, i dont give a shit. As a german, they could have blown up the brandenburg gate for all i care

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

If it’s as non-destructive as the rest of their protests, then I’d have nothing against it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Don’t waste energy categorizing right or wrong ways to protest. All this is a distraction from the actual issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Don’t tell me what to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Agreed. The more we argue about the “how” of the protests, the more we’re distracted from what they’re actually protesting about. The most effective way of stopping people complaining about something isn’t to shut them up, but to fix the thing.

If someone’s poor and can’t afford to buy food, no amount of fines or jail time will prevent them from going back to stealing food the second they get out because - guess what - they’re still fucking poor. There’s a food bank near where I lived a while ago that notoriously had long lines. Slowly shuffling forward in a queue that screams “I’m poor” must be uncomfortable, but they’re still not stealing food while they have an alternative.

If you want people to stop vandalising shit in their outrage over exploitation and greed, fucking do something about the exploitation and greed. I’m sure those people could have thought of more pleasant ways to spend their time than creating their cornflour pigment, driving out there and getting arrested to make a point without leaving lasting damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
1 point

Gotcha. So now we know the answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

It depends. I think that protest goes to far, if it really damages a building. Since this didn’t its all right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Oh, poor building, poor monuments, poor rocks. If only we have any way to declare our oposition againt bilionaires literally destroying the whole ecosystems, destroying people lives and health. But for fucking sake, the poor, orange painted monument. those damn protesters crossed uncrossable line. I will not support them anymore!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just Stop Oil said the paint was made of cornstarch and would dissolve in the rain.

Merriman said experts cleaned the orange powder from the stones because they were concerned about how it might react to water.

Might.

So because it could in the future maybe possibly damage it in some unspecified amount, they cleaned it off to be super sure there will be no damage.

So what fucking damage that really happened in the real world are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I never talked about damage at Stonehege. I said, that damaging buildings how’s to far. They didn’t damage Stonehenge so its fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I sure hope no buildings are damaged as society collapses from climate change strain

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Any protest that doesn’t physically damage buildings owned by the fossil fuel industry aren’t going far enough

This comment is advocating for property damage

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

My only opinion is that if the protest dosen’t hurt the owner class, then it’s not going to do anything anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

The protest isn’t intended to hurt the owner class. The protest is intended to draw attention to the issue. We’re talking about it therefore it’s an effective form of protest.

Without protests like this we go about our lives worrying about bills and ignore the literal apocalyptic catastrophe we’re nose-diving into.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Any protest is better than complaining or arguing on the internet. I’ll let the tactics to the actual people doing their actions. Nothing but encouragement from me 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points
*

I pissed on all them rocks, y’all gon stop flying private jets now? Don’t make me get some Taco Bell and come back. These people crack me up, like I give two fucks if they destroy historical artifacts and it’s actually going to change my mind about anything.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

They sprayed cornstarch on them, both piss and Taco Bell would be far worse. It is just about getting attention to people actually destroying the world, while not destroying anything. It would be cheaper and much easier to buy spray paint than to right cornstarch into a sprayable device… But that would cause damage, which they didn’t want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Everyone knows, it’s not a secret. And guess what, nothing changed. I’m going to start putting peace symbols on everything I see and hope it brings awareness to how bad war is 🤣🤣🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

No, you’ll just jerk off for the third time today and continue to post about how stupid everyone (but you) is

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

But that would cause damage, which they didn’t want.

They blocked ambulances

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They blocked ambulances to what? The stones? Feel like I just went /whoosh

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 198K

    Comments