-6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
72 points

Yup,. the hypocrisy is so thick you can taste it, and it’s bitter with a strong hint of propaganda. the world is lead by assholes, on all sides.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

the world is lead by assholes, on all sides.

This is an objectively true statement. Of course the world is lead by assholes.

We all know that power corrupts. Neuroscience has shown that getting power damages the brain’s capacity for empathy.

You just can’t lead a nation without becoming capable of great evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You just can’t lead a nation without becoming capable of great evil.

Jimmy Carter seems like a decent person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yup. One of the very few who had the capability and likely didn’t use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

There isn’t a single US president in living memory without a litany of war crimes on their head, and probably going back further but I don’t particularly feel like going back to pre-WWII history because just why bother at this point?

https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/08/18/jimmy-carters-blood-drenched-legacy/

https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/01/11/jimmy-carters-blood-drenched-legacy-2/

Jimmy Carter was good at lip-service, not in reality. And honestly, I don’t even think it’s because he was a particularly nasty person - although I wouldn’t be surprised, he was a politician - it’s just the job forces you to become a war criminal. That’s what happens when you volunteer to supervise the war crimes factory.

EDIT: Actually, if you want to go back further, read one of the US military’s most decorated generals on what the military’s true purpose is, written in the interwar period: https://archive.org/details/WarIsARacket

Edit 2: before anyone else wants to pile on this and call it all bullshit because they read one item and it wasn’t genocidal enough for them, at least read as far as East Timor, 1977. The list is chronological, if you get bored after the first item I’m sorry, but I’m not spoon-feeding you the whole article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Hell, a while ago France24 wasn’t even using the terms “Israel” or “IDF” in any of it’s reporting on the sacking of Gaza - they were literally pretending the bullets, bombs and missiles was being fired and dropped by some unknown party.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
50 points

So this piece doesn’t source any evidence that it was used and ignores the literal fact that later investigations by Amnesty didn’t find credible evidence of use as a military base and the massive Israeli misinformation campaign on that front: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_military_use_of_al-Shifa_hospital#:~:text=During the Israel–Hamas war,Hamas and hospital administrators denied.

But yeah let’s justify Israel bombing away access to medical care to people forced into a small, war torn area because fuck Palestinians I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

This is highly contested and no credible evidence has been produced for these claims. Israeli propagandists have been hard at work conjuring up lies wholesale and it’s shameful to repeat them without verification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Al Shifa was home to Hamas torture chambers for a decade at least.

Your link gave one example a decade ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What makes you think they’re still doing it? IDF/Netanyahu saying it without any credible evidence?

Also, what kind of logic justifies attacking a hospital which definitely has victims of Israel’s own relentless attack, on the off chance that the hospital might have terrorists?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

You linked something from a decade ago of something being claimed once, and claimed the link showed it’s been happening for a decade continuously.

I thought you were just confused so I didn’t ban you

If you knew what you were doing, then that was my mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

when the victims are lighter skinned

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

This is what it is and it’s ironic cause Palestinians aren’t even that dark.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sudan civil war what? too dark 4 me

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

When the victims aren’t strategic to US interests*

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

While that may be partially true, The Guardian ironically has a good opinion piece of the exact quotes being said by news reporter about “European” children getting bombed from 2022. Sometimes it IS related to the colour of their eyes and skin, and dismissive comments like yours come across pretty ignorant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Some reporters being racist, doesn’t mean that sensibilities of people aren’t moved when it’s non-white people, this was very patent during China’s oppressive policies against Uyghur in Xinjiang. There were years of condemnation and of people calling it genocide, and there was massive outcry here on Reddit. Would you say Uyghur are white, or is it just convenient to remember them and being concerned because the whole thing paints China in a bad light? I didn’t see nearly the same level of outrage during the actual genocide against Rohingya Muslims in south-east Asia.

permalink
report
parent
reply

A Boring Dystopia

!aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

Create post

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

–Be a Decent Human Being

–Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

–Posts must have something to do with the topic

–Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

–No NSFW content

–Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 5.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 561

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators