74 points

I assume this prevents some consumption of rations?

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

One of my favorite wizard characters was worried about rations, so I wrote into her backstory that she actually made an original 1st level spell for graduation of Wizard’s School.

That went over like a Lead Zeppelin. The spell used a tiny touch of wild magic to “randomly multiply” the ingredients you had available. Just a single berry? You’re getting a day’s worth of berries. A carrot, a celery stalk, and an onion? Well you’re getting all the fixins for a delicious vegetable stew.

The spell created magical food that couldn’t be used as the material component for a further cast, and consumed the material components given. It then produced 1 day worth of vegetables, fruit, and berries, per caster level up to 5.

The headmaster and two other professors watched my character demonstrate her spell, at which point the headmaster immediately mind wiped the other two professors, and explained that I could only keep that spell if I swore to NEVER allow anyone else to see me cast it. Apparently it strayed too close to Clerical magic, and could have reignited the Wizard/Cleric War, that never actually happened, and actually turn it into a shooting war this time.

That particular character gave up on creating new spells till she was above 16th level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

I was wondering why the DM would even need to make a call, but I guess that would be relevant.

Any DM that said no without a reason for a lack of ants would be a bad DM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Maybe an ant hunt mini adventure or some minor consequence to this action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Or just reward their creativity…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It also might not be enough calories for any kind of sustenance. It could just be the Druid’s kink

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Expend a use of Wild Shape to use one ration less?
I mean sure, go ahead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

My rule as DM is that players can freely expend their normally limited resources if it’s done for role playing or fun and doesn’t affect the story, combat, etc.

Druid wants to spend all evening as an owl in the rafters of the barn? Cool. Wizard wants to create a pocket dimension in which he can then use Wish to create the universe’s best ganja and smoke it in peace? Awesome.

Artificer wants to … wait, he wants to do WHAT with his pants? Okay fine, but we’re cutting to black for the evening. And there may be assassins in the morning now.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

If you can’t even fly around as an owl and eat voles in your free time, what is even the point?

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Ok so how much exp do I get for killing a hundred ants?

permalink
report
reply

Each ant only gives you 0.0000000001 XP so multiply that by 100.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Jokes aside

  1. They’d be 0 XP creatures
  2. XP should be awarded for progressing the story, the XP from CR is a helpful guideline for how much XP progressive encounters should award but killing random peasants or forest animals without progressing the story shouldn’t award anything.
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If creatures were to award xp, then all mages’ colleges wouldn’t be about learning / books / spells. Intro to magic 101 would be “alright class let’s slaughter us a bunch of goblins”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Well it does hurt the ants tho

permalink
report
reply
35 points

They deserve it for their crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 6K

    Comments