70 points

53 million in tax payer money meant for social services…

But Biden feels it’s just not a big fucking deal.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

He commuted all covid home release, non violent prisoners, I’m guessing none of them were as bad as this woman, but blanket sentance commutation sounds like a really bad policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Stealing from pension funds is violence. When we say nonviolent crimes we mean crimes that aren’t morally wrong, but are technically illegal. Like hacking corporate emails or shooting healthcare execs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I’m guessing none of them were as bad as this woman

Why?

What kind of criminals do you think were serving long prison terms but were approved for home detention instead?

Like, you’d have to be able to support yourself, so it’s already people relatively well off without ill-gotten gains. And they’re not risking jail to shoplift a Snickers.

If they risk jail its for very large amounts of money, especially because they can afford lawyers to get out of most stuff

The lists been out two days, I doubt this is the worst person who got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The kids-for-cash judge is, imo, worse, and he also got pardoned.

I think the really nasty pardons here, by nature of how they were selected, just ended up being a further continuation of the two justice systems we have for the rich and the poor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Also because, guess what, “non-violent” mostly just means white collar criminals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

yeah. this one upsets me way more than the one with his sone. this is some bullshit.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I haven’t heard a credible argument against the pardon for his son. Even the lack of conditions was necessary since the new administration will definitely target him if possible. The only shitty part was Biden’s need to telegraph his absolute faith in “X” system, which inevitably backfired, again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He could’ve pardoned any later trials for crimes dated before the pardon but allow the active trials to continue and let the courts decide the appropriate punishment. Instead he basically just exonerated him and now seems to be handing out pardons to make it seem like he’s objectively reviewing these cases instead of abusing his authority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t see a reason why he would allow active trials when they’ve already been targeting him. Pardoning later trials seems like an ambiguous distinction that would only harm him while he’s trying to protect him from political targeting. He’s not acting out of unsubstantiated fear of the future. It’s a reaction to active events.

Your last sentence is just a baseless assumption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Not a huge fan of Biden’s presidency, but it sounds like his commutations were based on whether society deemed them eligible for home release during covid. I’m assuming he didn’t individually look at all 1,500 other commutations. Unless I’m reading it wrong, society deemed her low risk and she has been out of prison since 2021.

Definitely sloppy tho.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

society deemed her low risk

No.

A judge did

And Biden is about to hand over 42 judicial seats to trump because he couldn’t even be bothered to nominate 30 of them

They had the numbers a couple times because Republicans kept missing sessions. A month ago Schumer held a vote on one and everyone celebrated instead of asking why he didn’t do the other dozen that had nominations.

Moderates by definition will never fight as hard as they can. They don’t want to win, they want a delicate balance which includes stopping their own party and helping the opposition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There’s like 1.2 million people in USA prisons. Why this group in particular?? Just do what every dem president does and release all the potheads without actually fixing the war on drugs problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Biden has never given a fuck about marijuana legalization

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He’s already put out blanket pardons for marijuana

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They literally set up parameters and pardoned everyone within those parameters. I’m sorry 2 errors got through, but 2 slips in 1500 is not bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Did 2 errors get through, or did 1498 people get released as plausible cover to slip in two favors? We’ll never know for sure, but judging Biden by the patterns of his other actions, he’s flatly unworthy of the benefit of the doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You got em! They did it just as a huge cover up for a person he has never met in his life /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

What is Biden doing?!

permalink
report
reply
16 points

stupid is as stupid does.

and Corrupt centrist trash is as corrupt centrist trash does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It’s like the Dems think “well might as well do a bunch of shit no one will like, we already lost”

As if people won’t remember in 4 years when they try and convince everyone to vote for them again.

Which, admittedly, either people probably won’t remember or Republicans will have another candidate where it won’t really matter how bad the Democrats candidate is because the Republicans will be so much worse.

(If there will be an election at all that is …)

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He only won because he was not Donald Trump, not because he was a good candidate. I’d still take him over Trump, but this is not surprising behavior.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments