142 points

Here’s an idea, make human life more important than line go up. I’m pretty sure that would get alllllll of your asses off the firing line.

permalink
report
reply

What if the line going up wasn’t money, but the value of human life? 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

We measure what we treasure!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You mean, it’s all just about the lines we meet along the way?

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Okay but what if we just sent everyone some stickers with our logo on it?

I mean EVERYBODY loves stickers. Then w we can keep making money, you can keep dying and you’ll have some great bling for your toddlers coffin!

Everybody wins!

Think of how few stickers are on the average toddler’s coffin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I was thinking pizza party myself, all our employees (except the ones we fired for being negative nancies) love pizza parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But my capitalism!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

But the cult of the line goes up says the line must go up, are you even paying attention to the line and whether it’s going up?

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Awww poor billionaires. So sad.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Good. Money can’t buy happiness and if they try, we need to take their happiness. Billionaires already have everything, they don’t need peace of mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot on Dec. 4, 2024. The public response was generally not sympathetic.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

The public response was generally not sympathetic.

The words they use are an attempt to weaken the impact of the hit. The public response wasn’t sympathetic, it was generally celebratory.

The elite cannot fathom being anything other than better than those below them. Deserving. They “got theirs.”

Maybe it was the significant amount of lead in the atmosphere for a long time that caused widespread brain damage, but it’s so obvious how disconnected from reality they are. Thompson’s death highlighted that reality applies to them too, and they can’t handle it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would like to believe people are poisoned and that excuses their idiocy, but approximately 15% of humans seem to be hardcore authoritarians by genetic lottery. They will believe that wealth and power are evidence of merit, no matter what. We just have to learn to work around that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
25 points

“When I was growing up, CEOs didn’t make millions more than everyone else in the company. I think we have to reflect on why there’s so much anger and do something about it.”

Only one of the 11 anonymous CEO responses gets it. There’s constant brainwashing in America (fortune.com is a literally part of it), that wealthy people made good decisions and were smart so they deserve every penny they make off the backs of everyone else.

This ruse might work in an economy of the past with fairer tax rules, better social mobility (for cis white males at the time), and industries where the consumer-company relationship aren’t counter to each other. With healthcare, it is plainly obvious that the money going to the executive is from people dying and sick people being denied care, forced into debt and bankruptcy, exploited for this product with extremely inelastic demand. Every minute they waste of your time keeping you away from your treatment is more dollars to them. That’s why people are upset at United, and aren’t upset about CEOs of these types of industries being murdered.

The country’s residents’ health should not be a commodity to be sold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
268 points
*

People are in disbelief that they would be making this kid into a hero,” he told Fortune.

Attending a conference for CEOs in New York this week, just blocks away from the site of the shooting, George found that many were shaken and deeply concerned by the reaction to Thompson’s killing. “They’re having plenty of meetings right now to discuss beefing up security,” he said of the business leaders, even as some question how much security coverage is enough. People are asking themselves, “‘What does that say about our society? Where’s our society going?’” George said.

So they’ve learned absolutely nothing.

Plenty of meetings to beef up security. How about plenty of meetings to understand how your greed has caused this? They sound one logical leap (that they are unwilling to make) away from understanding exactly what the problem is.

They managed to find one and only one CEO quote that reflected anything resembling self-awareness.

“When I was growing up, CEOs didn’t make millions more than everyone else in the company. I think we have to reflect on why there’s so much anger and do something about it.”

permalink
report
reply
10 points

That’s a bridge too far for them, especially with particularly oligarch friendly policies of the incoming US administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s what makes it sooo good, they think they just got the keys to the kingdom but forgot the all the residents can bite back at any time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Because CEOs are a symptom.

The problem is our investment economy that focuses only on the stock prices continually going up. It’s literally an unsustainable system.

If a CEO puts their personal safety over the investors, the company gets a new CEO.

They’re not the one really making the worst decisions, they’re the ones who agreed to take a shitton of money to be the face of the company and take all the blame.

CEOs don’t get paid for the work they do, they get paid to be the fall guy.

Still absolutely shit people who deserve zero sympathy, but they’re not the real problem, just a symptom

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

If a CEO puts their personal safety over the investors, the company gets a new CEO.

How many times will they be willing to get a new CEO before they make changes? How many times will someone accept promotion into that position? I wouldn’t take Brian Thompson’s job for any amount of money right now, would you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

How many times will someone accept promotion into that position? I wouldn’t take Brian Thompson’s job for any amount of money right now, would you?

I absolutely would take the job. I’d do it for a $1 salary even. I would have the power to make sure claims were approved, lower premiums on users, and call out the inequity of private healthcare from the top of the ivory tower. I’d be fired, but not before I was able to make some good happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How many times will they be willing to get a new CEO before they make changes

They’d do it on the daily if it makes them more money…

What do you think a CEO actually does?

They listen to what high level management says is best, and then just does whatever brings the stock price up fastet disregarding everything else.

There’s a reason they all get golden parachutes. None of them care past the last board meeting

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t always agree with what you post, but you’re spot on here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

The problem is our investment economy that focuses only on the stock prices continually going up. It’s literally an unsustainable system.

Yup, this is the problem right here. Investments are supposed to generate returns, that’s the whole point. But Milton Friedman and Jack Welch decided that the sole mission of any company was to increase shareholder value, and the rest of the world rolled with that. So whenever these CEOs point to their Mission and Vision statements, unless they say “Our only priority is delivering returns to our Shareholders”, they are lying.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_value

Economist Milton Friedman introduced the Friedman doctrine in a 1970 essay for The New York Times, entitled “A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits”.[5] In it, he argued that a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders.[6]

Meanwhile, we’ve decided that these corporations are people. Psychopaths who have no moral responsibilities to anyone but their shareholders, but people nonetheless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Thus our efforts to make social justice a core condition for profits: fuck people over and get a boycott or protests or a label in media as toxic, and lose customers.

It’s not going well, as a strategy. It requires an educated populace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. At some point companies need to transition from investment vehicles to institutions

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yep, we have a word for continual uninhibited growth - it’s called cancer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
167 points
*

All I can think of is a TED talk I saw where the speaker had given some presentation to a bunch of billionaires and had some q&a, and one of them who had built a bunker for themselves asked him how they could prevent their security team from turning on them in the bunker.

The TED talk guy responded “Be kind to them?”

And the Billionaire said “But where does that end?”

I’ll try to find it so I can link it.

EDIT: Found it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

I’ll try to find it so I can link it.

Oh god please do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

I’m pretty sure it was the same guy who did the “it could happen here podcast.” Then they were like, can we put shock collars on the security guards. Stuff like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

I managed to find what I was thinking of, but it concludes with a totally different line about them than I remembered. I think @neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com is right, and the “where does that end?” quote might be from a segment in a Robert Evans podcast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I don’t think it was a ted talk, I’m pretty sure it was a seminar put on specifically by the billionaire class asking this guy how best to navigate societal collapse with their vast amount of resources.

This I believe was one of the exchanges at that event.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

You’re right, though I was first introduced to the story from the guy telling it at a TED talk. I phrased it poorly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And it’s funny because the answer is build an egalitarian compound where your share of the labor is the funding. That’s it. If the guards see it as how they contribute to a shared community then they’re not going to turn on their boss

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

EDIT: Found it!

Wow, that was actually an extremely insightful conversation. Thank you for going out of your way to share it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That video was freakin amazing and insightful!

You should make this it’s own post so more people can spread it

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The guy is called Douglas Rushkoff and he wrote a book on the subject called “Survival of the Richest: Escape fantasies of the Tech Billionaires”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

The “what does this say about society” question bugs the shit out of me. It means that our society is sick and tired of being the only rich nation in the world where getting sick or injured will bankrupt you. If these people were truly concerned about the good of society, they’d quit sucking us dry for every dollar that they can and would advocate for a better system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Absolutely. The entire article makes it clear that they don’t even have an inkling of what it’s like to have to worry about your health or how much money you have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We live in a society!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It also bugs the shit out of me because how long have children been being murdered in school in a mass shooting epidemic, but now that the rich are being killed that’s what makes them ask this? Our society has been in bad shape for a long time

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Well they did learn one thing though

They finally learned how it is to be a high schooler, having to live under constant fear of murder. I can’t wait to watch C level execs having tondo active shooter drills where they have tonhude under bullet proof blankets.

Mind you, murder is bad, and this murder on this CEO was bad, no matter how you turn it. I don’t want to live in a world where murdering eachother is the only conversation left.

Having said that, it is very gratifying to finally see these out of touch assholes having to suffer the same fear as all little kids in America

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Great points!

Mind you, murder is bad

Yes for sure.

and this murder on this CEO was bad, no matter how you turn it.

I don’t want to live in a world where murdering eachother is the only conversation left.

Me neither. Let’s see if they are ready for any other kind of conversation now. OP makes me think they aren’t. Let’s not forget this murder happened because of all the other murders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Same for stealing.

A company steals millions from their employees? Silence.

A guy stealing from Walmart? Police force everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Yeah, you missed the point

Teo wrongs do not make a right. The murder of this CEO was still murder. This CEO indirectly murdered thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands and caused untold suffering. He was also apparently already on the hook for tax fraud and insider trading IIRC hearing in a news report earlier this week. He was a horrible man who should spend the remainder of his years behind bars.

That, unfortunately, is not the world we live in and I fully understand why he was shot. That doesn’t make it right, though. I don’t want to live in a world where you can be murdered without judges and juries and due process. We live in a civil society and that means that if you want it done right, everyone deserves a fair trial, even rapists, murderers or criminal CEO’s.

Yeah, I know that the US has a big issue with the justice system being damn near bullshit at this point, still doesn’t make anarchistic vigilante murdering an “okay” thing.

Do you want to live in a move civil society where everyone is treated equal, or do you prefer to live in a post civil society where it’s each for their own and we just murder those that we have a conflict with?

This murder of the CEO, as much as I understand it, is a step in the wrong direction. Maybe, just maybe, this will be the catalyst that will push society in the right direction and the US justice system will be overhauled and made fair for everyone and maybe the government will institute laws that will restrict what companies can do to make it fair for everyone… Doubtful, but maybe. Either way, it still is a step in the wrong direction and I do worry that the US is sliding off into a hellhole it will never be able to dig it self out of. This trump shit will inevitably make it easier for a few to abuse the rest. The few will control the news and narrative, and blame the leftz the immigrants, and at some point more on the left will start fighting instead of talking. Once the scale tips, there is no tipping back. Ask Yugoslavia how well that worked out for them. Oh yeah, millions of deaths later, it no longer exists.

How is that for a kind of conversation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Elysium

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Have been thinking about that movie quite a bit since all this went down, but don’t remember it in great detail. Might be worth a rewatch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They literally can’t see the light for all their wealth because they’re calvinists believing: the greater the wealth, the greater the morality.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 197K

    Comments