3 points

That’s why you should all do one each.

permalink
report
reply
45 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
8 points

I heard they all accidentally fell out of windows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Three times

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Oh, so like Boeing whistleblowers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
-34 points
*

Oppressing the owners of capital is good, actually. If you don’t do it you end up like the US where everyone has to pay them for everything all the time and the police is only there to prevent you from doing anything about it.

Chinese people don’t have to go out and get jailed for doming a mass murdering CEO out of desperation, the government gladly prosecutes and makes an example of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

By this logic, a monarchy that keeps the aristocracy in line is better than the US democracy. A benevolent dictator is still a dictator.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The problem with a benevolent dictator is that they die eventually, and are replaced by a non-benevolent dictator, or a civil war, or both. Unfortunately it looks like the US democracy might have the same outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

In what manner is Xi a dictator? The fact that he has been reelected democratically and hasn’t lost to someone else?

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Except Xi Jinping is not oppressing owners of capital. China has lots of oligarchs that in some ways have a tighter grip on society than their western counterparts. He’s oppressing people that are “inconvenient” to him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Did you get that info from the same dudes insisting that killing Brian Thompson was, like, not okay guys? Businessmen in China are scared shitless of the party, and so should they, the party has 87 million members and a 90+ approval rating.

There’s no CEO in china wielding one tenth of the influence that weird nazi Elon Musk has, or Bill Gates’ vaccine privatizing ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

These are all vibes, can you explain exactly how and why you believe Xi is simply “oppressing those invonvenient” to him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’s oppressing people that are “inconvenient” to him.

All vibes, no thoughts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

China ranks second in the world in number of millionaires as well as number of billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

China ranks second in the world in human population, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Per capita or total?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
  1. Quantity of bourgeoisie is not an indication of who runs the country or which is primary, public or private property

  2. China has the second biggest population in the world, period.

The PRC saw what happened when you cracked down too hard on wealth inequality too early in the USSR, there was significant brain drain and people took what they could elsewhere. This eventually led to decreased growth and contributed to collapse. The PRC instead allows billionaires (so long as they don’t commit crimes), and as a consequnce they now have the largest economy by PPP and second largest by GDP. It’s a “boiling the frog” approach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Yeah, but they get jailed for literally anything else lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What do you mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Brother the US has ONE FIFTH of the world’s inmates (in dire conditions that provide slave labor) despite having less than 5% of the world population.

If y’all didn’t thoughtlessly and immediately internalize whatever outlandish shit your media tells you about the yellow peril you’d be envious of their living standards and, honestly? Their political freedom too.

That’s the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The original was funny to me because people thought the second guy was fine when the reality would be if a woman is calling human resources there’s probably something there. It’s a joke told from the perspective of someone who’s unable to see anything wrong and is only representing their side of the story. So I thought this was a riff on that idea, and viewed in that light this version is funny too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The difference is that Xi is now the CEO.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

What does that even mean? Do you think he personally plans and runs all of the public sector of the PRC that take’s up over half of the economy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

> government runs half the economy

‘But how is dear leader like a CEO, unless he signs every paycheck by hand?’

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The public sector has their own planners, Xi deals more with broad policies and decisions. That’s like saying Biden is the “CEO” of Amazon, it doesn’t make sense, plus the CPC heavily plans even the Private Sector. This is all in line with Marxism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Who told you that?

Western supremacists think every country they’re in a trade war with doesn’t even elect their leaders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

It is indeed possible for a person/entity to do a good thing and a bad thing. Who would’ve guessed, it’s actually incredibly likely. I’m sure Luigi was no angel and can be criticized about many things, though he likely didn’t have the power to perform systematic human rights transgressions.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

I bet he’s a shit surfer and just hangs out on his board looking cool, but bails when a big wave comes in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Pretty damning if true. Paints him in a whole new light. Feeling betrayed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 48K

    Comments