EDITED: Change link to proper article instead of a stupid video, and changed associated text to match new URL.
Disgusting, in my opinion.
Because this guy needs more attention and validation for being a giant piece of shit.
The words in the article literally disgusted me. We have a person who is willing to sell out this country, harms hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent people, and a fucking moron to boot, being talked about like he was some underdog who had a witch hunt placed on him. Literally made me sick to my stomach.
They should have brought back the scrolly border while they were at it.
They can name whoever the fuck they want but it’s stolen valor. We all know who the person of 2024 is.
Today in the US: Stupid magazine names Jeffrey Epstein’s closest friend and whiny little bitch as person of the year.
I mean, he is definitely person of the year. It’s not best person of the year, it’s the person that had the most impact. His victory was more sweeping than anyone expected. He gained ground in every demographic. The political parties are likely to be forever changed after that election. I just hope the democrats don’t learn the wrong lessons.
Why do it that way, though? It’s always felt like it must have been a retcon to explain why they messed up and went with Hitler in 38. Why call someone horrible “person of the year” and give them more attention. Seems like time could be spent better on someone that had a positive impact.
Because it’s their publication and that’s how they decided to do it? I don’t know, I’m not the one calling the shots at Time magazine. I think you can make strong justifications for either way of doing it. It’s probably harder to do it the way you’re suggesting because no one has a crystal ball and you can’t know that someone won’t become a terrible person or that they’re hiding some terrible thing.
Luigi was robbed.
