38 points

Reddit all over again.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Yes! Good. Hopefully this pushes more people off their platform to decentralized alternatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Such as?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

For recommendations and discovery (which was a large part of what kept me with Spotify), I’m a big fan of https://listenbrainz.org/ In the time I’ve been using it, the recommendations have gotten way better, and I appreciate their efforts towards transparency. (Yay for open source)

You can import listen data from music streaming services, so if anyone is curious, I’d recommend setting it up and seeing how it goes; I only recently got round to cancelling my Spotify, but before then, I had it set up so my Spotify listens would show up on my listenbrainz.

You’re quite right though that there aren’t any straightforward replacements for Spotify. Personally, I’m returning to the seven seas, which is why I’m so appreciative of listenbrainz — that discovery stuff really was the last big thing chaining me to Spotify

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

FunkWhale would welcome more users I’m sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean, we could all move to Funk Whale, however, finding/sharing music on that would be if not illegal then highly contencious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Please don’t break Toastify again. Please…

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Spotify has vaguely attributed the need for the API changes to improving security:

  • In its blog post, Spotify says that it rolled out the changes with “the aim of creating a more secure platform.”
  • In a community forum post, a Spotify employee says that “we want to reiterate the main message from the blog that we’re committed to providing a safe and secure environment for all Spotify stakeholders.” The post has many pages of replies from frustrated developers.
  • In a statement to The Verge, Spotify spokesperson Brittney Le Roy says that “as part of our ongoing work to address the security challenges that many companies navigate today, we’re making changes to our public APIs.”

This is fairly disingenuous. The affected endpoints are all GET requests, which are read-only requests that provide some data about the track/artist/playlist/etc. There isn’t really very much potential to do anything insecure here.

The only thing they’re securing is their hegemony.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

“To improve financial security”

Fixed it

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments