Summary

Vietnam’s High People’s Court upheld the death sentence for real estate tycoon Truong My Lan, convicted of embezzlement and bribery in a record $12 billion fraud case.

Lan can avoid execution by returning $9 billion (three-quarters of the stolen funds), potentially reducing her sentence to life imprisonment.

Her crimes caused widespread economic harm, including a bank run and $24 billion in government intervention to stabilize the financial system.

Lan has admitted guilt but prosecutors deemed her actions unprecedentedly damaging. She retains limited legal recourse through retrial procedures.

59 points

Can we do this in Canada?? I know of a few deserving candidates

permalink
report
reply
33 points

USA enters the chat

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Because the death penalty is obviously only applied to those most deserving it and not to those with the smallest defence budget and the least public support

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think they meant that the US has a lot of billionaires deserving of the guillotine

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Work on your reading comprehension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We’d have to have China execute them…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Russia could make them some tea. ☢️

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Nice to see some good news for once

permalink
report
reply
42 points

returning $9 billion (three-quarters of the stolen funds)

You can keep the 3 billion and live?

reducing her sentence to life imprisonment.

but it has to be in jail?

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

She still deserves to be in jail. $12 billion is no small amount, and if she can pay back that $9 billion, or even if she can pay back the entire amount, she still had committed a serious crime and deserves to go to jail.

And don’t even think about her keeping that $3 billion. That’s illegal money that she still needs to pay back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

ok, so why not just have that be the condition for the removal of the death penalty?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Perhaps it’s a realization that under the circumstances of a forced sale, she couldn’t possibly repay the total. In which case, with death inevitable, could she leave it to a loved one instead? Probably it could be seized but there’d be a legal tangle which repayment would avoid? Just speculation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

You can keep the 3 billion and live?

No, as another comment pointed out, that isn’t legal. The assets she has from her embezzled money aren’t liquid; she doesn’t have $12 billion literally sitting in a bank account. These have to be sold off for đồng, and especially if she’s forced to quickly sell them off in exchange for her life (somehow another reason why the death penalty is stupid), she’ll likely retrieve substantially less than she could otherwise by being able to wait for better opportunities to sell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

đồng

Teehee

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Cries in American

permalink
report
reply
193 points

All we gotta do is sentence a handful of billionaires to death and watch the behaviour change when they realize they’re not insulated from consequence anymore.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Yeah but what they are going to do is make sure they get those protections back. They aren’t going to get better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Then sentence more of them as necessary. Im all for sweeping changes but we’re not getting them. Convincing America to kill someone seems way more likely to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

You didn’t hear it from me, but I heard that billionaire skipped the fare on the subway…

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Imagine all the outrage from red state conservatives if we attempted this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Or from blue state liberals because “we’re better than them” or some shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s not like any of us want life to be made so difficult when we’re billionaires either

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good point, good point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m okay with the outrage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There wouldn’t be any outrage outside of 100s of the wealthy donors. Liberals would completely be more outraged because of norms and civility. The entire point of “drain the swamp” was that most people hate oligarchs, the point of Republicans is to redirect this off into racist and unproductive channels, where nothing ever comes of this hate for corporate and wealthy overlords.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh who cares, they get outraged when a day ends in y.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

In most, if not all, of the world billionaires can just murder whomever they can’t buy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Clearly not Vietnam

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Hold them accountable for all the preventable deaths resulting from them screwing around with the economy. 2008 would have seen a ton of them going to prison for the rest of their life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

2008 turned me from a lib into an anarchist. I’ve completely lost faith in their facade over oligarchy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.7K

    Posts

  • 97K

    Comments