Summary

Vietnam’s High People’s Court upheld the death sentence for real estate tycoon Truong My Lan, convicted of embezzlement and bribery in a record $12 billion fraud case.

Lan can avoid execution by returning $9 billion (three-quarters of the stolen funds), potentially reducing her sentence to life imprisonment.

Her crimes caused widespread economic harm, including a bank run and $24 billion in government intervention to stabilize the financial system.

Lan has admitted guilt but prosecutors deemed her actions unprecedentedly damaging. She retains limited legal recourse through retrial procedures.

193 points

All we gotta do is sentence a handful of billionaires to death and watch the behaviour change when they realize they’re not insulated from consequence anymore.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Yeah but what they are going to do is make sure they get those protections back. They aren’t going to get better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Then sentence more of them as necessary. Im all for sweeping changes but we’re not getting them. Convincing America to kill someone seems way more likely to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

You didn’t hear it from me, but I heard that billionaire skipped the fare on the subway…

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Imagine all the outrage from red state conservatives if we attempted this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Or from blue state liberals because “we’re better than them” or some shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s not like any of us want life to be made so difficult when we’re billionaires either

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good point, good point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m okay with the outrage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh who cares, they get outraged when a day ends in y.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There wouldn’t be any outrage outside of 100s of the wealthy donors. Liberals would completely be more outraged because of norms and civility. The entire point of “drain the swamp” was that most people hate oligarchs, the point of Republicans is to redirect this off into racist and unproductive channels, where nothing ever comes of this hate for corporate and wealthy overlords.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Hold them accountable for all the preventable deaths resulting from them screwing around with the economy. 2008 would have seen a ton of them going to prison for the rest of their life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

2008 turned me from a lib into an anarchist. I’ve completely lost faith in their facade over oligarchy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

In most, if not all, of the world billionaires can just murder whomever they can’t buy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Clearly not Vietnam

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Two things America loves: billionaires and the death sentence. It has just never thought to combine them in this way.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I don’t care for billionaires or the death sentence.

If we revised the system I could be okay with the death sentence in some situations but the way it is now makes absolutely no sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I am against the death penalty and would only give it consideration in the case of billionaires

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t trust the state to ever decide whether someone deserves to live or die.

Some vigilantes on the other hand…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Meh, I am more lax with life. I think it can easily be done more humane and much cheaper. Shit for a while there I remember reports that the drugs we used weren’t allowed to be used to euthanize pets because they were to inhumane. That said, I think anyone who gets a long sentencing should be allowed the choice. 15 years, or you chose to live 1 year in prison and then if you still agree a year later a mask with carbon monoxide would be fine for me.

We always worry we are killing innocent people, and innocent people will die this way as well, it at least was their choice though. If you do it in a decent way… Instead of it costing far more than life in prison does already right now, it could be beneficial to some people.

Then again I also think assisted suicide should be legal as well. Same sort of idea. Choice to check into a facility or live in normal life, with a set year of discussion with a therapist and at the end of that year if you still wish to be done, your done.

Or even just a sedative to knock you unconscious like at the oral surgeon, then put the mask on the person for 30 mins. They wouldn’t feel a thing and it would be cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Can we do this in Canada?? I know of a few deserving candidates

permalink
report
reply
33 points

USA enters the chat

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Because the death penalty is obviously only applied to those most deserving it and not to those with the smallest defence budget and the least public support

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think they meant that the US has a lot of billionaires deserving of the guillotine

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Work on your reading comprehension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We’d have to have China execute them…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Russia could make them some tea. ☢️

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Nice to see some good news for once

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Any fans of George Carlin here? Remember his bit about the death penalty saying that he would rather have it be done not to poor violent criminals like gangsters and common idiotic murderers, but would rather have it done to the people who really and truly fear death… like major league white collar criminals.

Gang members live violent lives and often don’t have optimistic views for the future, so they know that any day might be their last. A wealthy ass failson of super millionaires who prides himself on fucking over thousands of people every day and is almost pleased to see lawsuits coming in for stolen wages and sexual harassment, however, is confident that they will die free and wealthy and probably have some active organizations named after them.

So the death penalty for them, especially when are forced to spend their time awaiting it in some cold, damp and dirty cell with prison guards who were born in poverty and treat them no differently than some poor drug-addicted shoplifter, is a terrifying concept. Also what needs to happen is that ALL their assets are confiscated. I mean ALL of them. No loopholes for transferring that shit overseas or ‘technically it’s in my wife’s/Son’s name’ bullshit. They get nothing. Their family gets nothing and will be, at best, a middle class family with middle class prospects going forward (no more failsons from that lineage).

This would be the best punishment for any billionaire. They die, get buried in a potter’s field or prison graveyard like common thugs, and their legacies smashed.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

I think this case is closely watched by the elites who it may concern. Especially the social reaction. I am waiting for them to spin it like “Communist Dictatorship Vietnam” in conservative media (if it gains mainstream traction).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In all honesty, the enlightenment revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries needed to bring this change about. To hold the wealthy to much higher standards than the poor. If that did happen, we wouldn’t be living in the capitalist hellscape that is today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There is already a concept from french nobility about that… Didn’t prevent their head to roll in the end

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noblesse_oblige?wprov=sfla1

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.7K

    Posts

  • 97K

    Comments