Summary

In response to Donald Trump’s re-election, some same-sex couples, like Ben Nelson and Adam Weinberger, are accelerating plans to marry, fearing potential rollbacks of LGBTQ rights.

Concerns stem from the Supreme Court’s 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade and past statements from conservative justices suggesting interest in revisiting the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage.

While the Respect for Marriage Act offers federal safeguards, uncertainty persists.

LGBTQ-friendly businesses are stepping up to support couples, but fears of broader restrictions, including on parenting options, remain widespread among the community.

70 points
*

I wonder what the chances are that the coming administration invalidate such marriages, probably on some dumb Christian nationalist grounds

permalink
report
reply
-24 points

the Democrats defended Roe v. Wade so hard it fell so it is scary what four years of Republican rule will bring

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

We don’t get much from the democrats. But at least we do get something. I’d really hate to be one of those people that spent the whole last year as “useful idiots” for foreign Nations and oligarchs. Screaming about how Democrats are just the same as Republicans and just genocidal murders.

I assume most didn’t want things to get worse. Didn’t want trump. This has to be like ashes on their tongue. I hope that they and the people they misinformed/demotivated. Will be ready to show solidarity if we’re ever given another chance at elections. And do what it takes to keep Republicans and their allies far away from any elected office for the rest of their lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

tasted like ashes since the one and only time was allowed to cast a vote and Obama got it

both parties have utterly failed the US and it is past time to face the reality that both parties are bought and paid for

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I hope that they and the people they misinformed/demotivated. Will be ready to show solidarity if we’re ever given another chance at elections.

Yes I hope all those center-right neolibs running the party realize the failure of their ways and join in solidarity with those of us on the left. I have my doubts though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Supreme Court has already signaled that gay marriage is on the chopping block.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I wonder how this would work with their anti-trans initiatives. If a transwoman tried to marry her girlfriend, would it technically be legal under their backwards laws?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Logically yes, but they are not bound by logic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

No, they see us as criminals and will deny every right they can, marriage, public service, equal treatment under the law, medical insurance/medication, freedom of association, speech, and even our right to exist. The point is to criminalize and erase our existence from public life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Transwomen aren’t people, silly! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Weren’t they against sharia law?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Only if you call it that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It’s already happening in Italy, so there’s no reason to believe the GOP would hold back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Italy has never recognized same-sex marriage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sorry, Captain Pedantic — they have same-sex unions (and recently banned travel for surrogacy specifically for gay couples)

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Anything is possible, but it would be far more difficult to invalidate existing marriages than prevent new ones. Which is exactly why couples are rushing to get it done now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They are openly stating they will deport legal citizens… so, acting like their should be no concern might not be a great idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No one should bet against it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

My husband and I did this after the Dobbs decision came down and cited ‘future reconsiderations’ for Casey and Obergefell. Called a handful of friends and family and told them to meet us at the courthouse in two weeks.

Now, we are bracing to help people who may have to travel to our blue state to get married, just like they had to 15-ish years ago. We may not be able to leave, but we have some means to help others, so we are doing what we can.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

My partner and I got our partnership right after the election on a lazy day

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m a registered minister in the church of the latter day dude based out of Oregon and am happy to marry lgbtq folks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thank you! We are on the opposite coast, but we are working with ministers like yourself to make sure we have plenty of options for people to choose from. Best of luck over the next years, and here’s to many more happy weddings!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d imagine any church of latter dude to be pretty chill

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We mostly just abide.

In all seriousness, I got it while I was stationed down in Georgia in the army. Your options to get married were to go in front of a judge (good luck with that), or pay a “minister” anywhere from 100-250 or whatever to ask you whether or not you knew each other, if you were in love, and whether or not you were getting married just for tax purposes.

I thought that was bullshit, so I registered with the church of the latter day dude and married people for the cost of a lunch or a six pack of decent beer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
30 points

Show me how much you don’t know about presidential power, or history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yep, that’s on the congress. Which Democrats did not have sufficient control of. Which Republicans/DINOs would have struck down hard if they even tried. But simple minds do love simple solutions for complex problems. Regardless of whether they work or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You’re upset someone called you out on your shit because you want to say whatever you want without consequences? Okay MAGA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Gay marriages seem a bit purer to me because you know it’s not about kids. They legit like each other.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I’m heterosexual and we were marred for 10 years before we had a kid. My brother has been married to a woman almost 30 years and has never had kids. My uncle has been married to a woman almost 50 years and has never had kids. I have lots of friends who are heterosexual and married and have no kids.

And there are two queer couples I’m friends with that do have kids.

On top of that, I know people with kids who never got married.

Marriage and children are really not related except when it comes to certain legal issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I was thinking more being socially forced to marriage thanks to issues revolving around biological kids which to me “ruins the sanctity” of marriage. Meanwhile gay people don’t have that issue. Like oh no someone got my pregnant if I don’t get marriage my family stone me but my partner is a one night stand that I found out is a serial killer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure, that happens, but I would suggest that’s the minority of marriages these days. Not being married and having kids is just not the social stigma it used to be. The main reason, like I said, is legal stuff like custody and that really needs to be fixed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I know multiple same-sex couples that got married explicitly for the purpose of being allowed to adopt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well least it’s not like biological clock is ticking so get pregnant now or else leading to bad choices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Well, some gay couples do have kids. Some men have ovaries and some women have testicles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Just because same sex couples don’t birth kids doesn’t mean we’ll stop trying.

Anything is possible through Jesus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I see that more likely with 2 females than 2 males. Unless Arnold Schwarzenegger JR becomes a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I feel like this is a good way to get yourself on a target list.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

They’re likely on a list already if that’s the case, but it is standing for what they believe in

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 207K

    Comments