If someone sprung that trap on me, I’d say “no, it’s a toy. A toy doesn’t have any consent right or consciousness… just like a woman” and than I’d just walk away. If you want to be cunts, ww can be cunts
It’s not a joke, it’s an expression of my disgust for the entrapment.
Normal people have the intelligence required to express disgust without insulting all women.
Why is everyone getting angry at this woman who most likely doesn’t even exist
Turns out, engaging with the hypothetical creates more interesting discussion than saying “fake” and nothing else.
Being asked to do a task by the person responsible for administering the task automatically obviates you from being classified as a rapist.
What? If another person asks me to to rape a person then does that absolve me from being a rapist? Am i misunderstanding you?
Yes.
They are penis models, not human beings.
It is context specific.
If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.
So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?
The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.
Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.
If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can’t be a raping their dildo. It ain’t difficult.
In the context they’re obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can’t be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.
trolling is a art
