“ma’am, the penis’s owner, you, literally told me to put a condom on it. Not sure how much more consent I could have.”
Why is everyone getting angry at this woman who most likely doesn’t even exist
Turns out, engaging with the hypothetical creates more interesting discussion than saying “fake” and nothing else.
Being asked to do a task by the person responsible for administering the task automatically obviates you from being classified as a rapist.
What? If another person asks me to to rape a person then does that absolve me from being a rapist? Am i misunderstanding you?
Yes.
They are penis models, not human beings.
It is context specific.
If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.
So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?
The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.
Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.
If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can’t be a raping their dildo. It ain’t difficult.
In the context they’re obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can’t be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.
“Did you ask them for their consent before putting them here on display, naked?”
Shoulda put the condom on your own penis. 🤦♂️
