The car did not get a ticket.

61 points

“UNABLE TO ISSUE CITATION TO COMPUTER,” say dispatch records, AZCentral writes. Arizona law does allow officers to give out tickets when a robotaxi commits a traffic violation while driving autonomously; however, officers have to give them to the company that owns the vehicle. Doing so is “not feasible,” according to a Phoenix police spokesperson quoted by trade publication Repairer Driven News earlier this year.

permalink
report
reply
100 points

however, officers have to give them to the company that owns the vehicle. Doing so is “not feasible,” according to a Phoenix police spokesperson

That’s gotta be the biggest crock of shit I’ve ever heard, you write the ticket up, and you mail it to the company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Give them a Jira ticket

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’ll just have a string of complaints from citizens about the fine not being implemented while in sits there for years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The weight increases each month it’s open and you need to go speak to a judge to have it lowered. If the ticket is open for too long, the police issue a warrant for your arrest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah that’s some bullshit. I got tagged by a speed camera in the Netherlands, two months later I got the citation in California. They sent it to the registered owner, sixt, they forwarded it to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Knowing the Netherlands, it likely was a hefty fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Let say the ticket is 100 dollars thats like a millisecond of profit for Google. So what’s the point, threaten them with revoking the robot taxi license.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, you see, companies are wealthy and they have great lawyers, unlike the poors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which company is that? The car is probably owned by an LLC based out of a different state, so you have to track down the formation documents there to find the owning company, only to find it’s membership is another LLC in a different state, and so on for 90 levels of bullshit.

I do code enforcement on commercial properties and it can take 50 hours and thousands of dollars in research to figure out who the responsible party is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Code enforcement for commercial properties is one thing, a simple traffic citation is another.

The responsible party is usually whoever is driving. In the case of self-driving taxi services, like Waymo, the ticket should go to the company the vehicle is registered under.

Which is super easy to pull up, so easy in fact that other automated enforcement mechanisms, like tolls or red light cameras do this with rental companies all the time. Rent a car and go through some tolls or trigger a red light camera and you’ll get a bill “forwarded” to you in a month or 2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

This should be an automatic impound of the vehicle and when the rep comes to pick it up hand them the ticket. Or you know, make the police send them a damn ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

so it’s just effectively legal to send out killer robotaxis, great!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

* Elon musk enters the chat *

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Well at least no one died this time

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Per mile driven, all of these autonomous systems are statistically better than humans at driving.

It’s mostly because humans are dogshit at driving, but you are a lot safer using these systems than not, despite media reporting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s only because they don’t drive that fast, and they just dump most problems to a human driver. If a self-driving car stopped in the middle of an intersection and a human driver hit it, the blame would legally fall on the human despite the fact that the self-driving car caused the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Liability of an accident doesn’t factor into those statistics. They include all accidents regardless of blame.

And you act like that exact scenario hasn’t happened with human drivers. In Arizona alone, 3.5 people die every day in traffic incidents. Given the number of dumb fuck road ragers brake checking other drivers on the road, stopping in the middle of an intersection and getting hit probably happens at least once a day, probably more.

Yet even with all those fatalities, and other accidents in general, the autonomous systems still have fewer incidents per mile driven.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s an apples to oranges comparison. Self driving cars aren’t driving on the same roads and in the same conditions. Maybe they’re better, but that hasn’t really been tested/evaluated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Sir, your whole family died in a waymo accident.

First of all, statistically, the chance was bigger that they didn’t die. And now leave the billionaires alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

3.5 died on Arizona roads yesterday and 3.5 more will die today - think the robots will be safer than us someday?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They already are, the media just reports on every one of these crashes. Even just reporting on each human fatality daily would put things closer to perspective even with every autonomous accident being reported as if it were the end times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, considering way more than 3.5 people crash and die in Arizona every day… I’d say yes. They will become safer about a year ago it sounds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Wait… Did the car actually stop for the police officer? Or did they have to basically block the car to get it to stop?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That’s Waymo excitement than they are used to over there in Phoenix.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*
permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.zip

Create post

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 4.3K

    Comments

Community moderators