26 points

I support this move. Some here are delusionally arguing that this impacts privacy - the sort of data social media firms collect on teenagers is egregiously extensive regardless. This is good support for their mental health and development.

permalink
report
reply

This ban does nothing.

Anything that does not force ID verification is useless.

Anything that does verify ID would mean that adults also have to upload their IDs to the website.

What will happen is either this becomes another toothless joke. Or the government say “okay this isn’t working, lets implement ID checks”, and when that law passes Lemmy Instance Admins would be required to verify ID of any user from an Australia IP.

Y’all want that to happen?

So what hapoens if other countries start catching on and also pass such law?

Eventually the all internet accounts would be tied to IDs. Anonymity is dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

If i recall correctally, Australia tried to fine adults if they didnt have thier phone with them. Ive heard a relaible youtuber say it, but i couldnt find a news article to confirm it.

Went to look for the article. Found something even worse https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-24/can-border-force-search-your-phone-when-you-travel-to-australia/100774644

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Government provided open id service which guarantees age. Website gets trusted authority signed token witch contains just the age. We can do this safely. We have the technology. They could even do it only once on registration.

Digital id’s exist already in the EU, and many countries run a sign on service already. We aren’t far from this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Depending on what the token contains.

There are two implementations I could think of:

“This user has been verified to be at least [Age]. Sincerely, [Government Authority]” Assuming this is an identical token thats the same for everyone? Sure. I’m not opposed to this.

“This user has been verified to be at least [Age]. Unique Token ID: 23456” Hell No. When the government eventually wants to deanonymize someone, they could ask the website: “What was the token ID that was used to verify the user?” then if the website provides it, now the government can just check the database to see who the token belongs to. And this could also lead to the government mandating the unique token id to be stored.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No. I don’t want governments to know what social media I use, nor do I want social media to know what country I’m a citizen of. I don’t want any connection between the two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This ban is a wake up call to Tech Industry to implement and enforce rules against hate speech, grooming, fake news, etc. They surely cannot verify the age of a human without any official ID made in the real world. This leads to other problems but that’s not the concern of the government! Social Media wants it’s users, not the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This ban is a wake up call to Tech Industry

what? Why would tech industry care? If anything it’ll have the reverse effect and dimiss tech role in brain rott because “see, kids are not on it! It’s all good here”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is good support for their mental health and development.

This is good pseudo-science.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There is no published science definitively proving that it is harmful or helpful. The effects of this particular legislation, if it is impactful at all, remains to be seen. I’m just offering my opinion based on my personal experiences. I expect it to have some success in reducing acute adolescent mental health issues. If the matter is ever settled through consensus, I’ll defer to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How can you look at the state of things pretty much everywhere since social media has become so ubiquitous and think that it has no effect on people, young people especially? It’s full of hate, envy, propaganda, and brainwashing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Strange that the adults don’t want those benefits for themselves also.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d support banning it for everyone as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Imagine if this was done around the world. And then imagine how empty the Internet would be.

You don’t need to ban kids from the Internet. You need to ban pedophiles from it.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

The damage to children’s lives done by social media is catastrophic.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People used to say the same thing about video games. And movies. And even books.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“Guns don’t kill people, social media does!”

-America Under Project 2025

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

And “banning children”, wait, I mean forcing every adult to verify who they say they are online accomplishes what?

Oh, that’s right, a massive tracking database for any bad actor to use.

If your children get into shit, it’s your fault for not raising them right. I got into some shit as a kid, and had friends that got into more/less shit.

I watched those fuckups raise their kids, and they learned from their own childhood experience and chose to guide their children how to use the internet properly. To understand how it works, the risks, etc.

You can’t bubble wrap the world. The idiots (myself included) will always find a way around such safetyism, and in the process you’ll be harming everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are we not already subject to massive tracking databases anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I strongly disagree.

Social media is terrible for mental health especially for the youth. Phones and tablets help in some areas like motor control development but also hurt other places like attention deficiencies and critical thinking, and very rarely does it lead to a kid learning how technology works (that’s usually from the computer nerds, aka kids who want a computer, doesn’t happen even close to the same rate as smart phones.

Smart phones make people dumb. That’s my opinion. But the above are scientifically backed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

100% agree. These things get talked up as benefits when they are mostly treated as revenue streams by the seller and distractions by the buyer. Kids and adults. We all need to be way more critical of the tech we use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then parents need to stop using such things as babysitters.

And parents also need to get up in arms about lazy “educators” using tech to make their job easier (instead of making learning more effective, which is the bullshit argument that’s always used).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Parenting is harder than ever, so I don’t blame parents.

Back in the day you would have the mother home all the time, even more recently there was still a strong community in most places and big families meant lots of babysitters.

Nowadays it’s fend for yourself for everybody almost everywhere, so raising a kid properly is almost impossible unless you are rich or have a lot of free time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Most of the technical problems with learning/teaching are actually caused by sticking to outdated 19th century concepts in schools such as having the (by definition average) local teacher explain things instead of someone who actually knows how to explain the subject matter well and pretending that kids need to memorize everything in a modern world instead of incorporating the ability to look up things into the learning process.

Most of the actual major problems with education are caused by funding structures and deliberate sabotage by parts of society who benefit from an uneducated population without critical thinking and research skills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

We can’t rely on the assholes running these site to ban pedophiles. They’d endorse a pedophile president if they thought it would give them less taxes/regulations.

This is a prudent move, we’ve only seen the very beginnings if the sorts of indoctrination and manipulation our kids might be subjected to.

Never thought I’d sound this way, but i can no longer ignore reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You need to raise kids better instead of delegating that job to the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I feel like every law I see coming out of Australia is just telling their citizens they’re not allowed to do something else mundane. All while the government services get worse, and the corrupt become more entrenched.

What a shithole.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Like what?

Often the things that seem mundane actually aren’t

Like vaping is just tobacco 2.0… and we don’t need everyone to have easy access to guns (especially not kids). Networks like Facebook are so unmoderated at the moment they should be held to account.

Asbestos and engineered stone? Enough said

And that’s mainly everything I can think of that’s banned that I can think of…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

Like vaping is just tobacco 2.0

What is this, govern me like a strict old nan?

Is dancing allowed down there as well or is it a gateway to thievery or something?


Oh, I forgot, Lemmy is only lefty and free when they aren’t being told what to boycott by someone else. I guess we do have something in common with Trump voters.

Nooo, imposing our will on the public is ok under some circumstances!

FUCKING SHEEP

My life. My way. Fuck a government telling me what to do.

I guess I am the crazy one. It’s just human nature to want to be controlled and be told what to do. Viva authoritarianism. Dom me harder, Donny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

For real. A whole fucking country infantilizing themselves. Pathetic to see bootlicking at this level.

And it’s not even a good government. I guess I could empathize, if the government was not corrupt and delivering fantastic quality services. But they’re shitting on these people, and telling them to say thank you for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Vaping companies like Vape4life were writing petitions on Facebook arguing that Vaping was great to help smokers stop smoking.

Meanwhile, the same dodgy companies were selling vapes to 10 year olds online (they had NOTHING in place to stop underage people buying them). What possible health use could underage people have for vapes?

Meanwhile, every vaping fuckwit around was smoking vapes illegally on trains and in heavily populated public areas. And every asshole (including my ex housemate) was vaping inside (I literally told her not to. I want to do high altitude mountaineering in the future so I need my lungs. And she was getting super cheap rent). When you tell them to do it outside, they always say “vaping is just water, it’s perfectly safe”.

If you want to “eat the rich”, you should be telling Smoking companies to fuck off. They’re lying to their userbase, whilst their exec’s become wealthy millionaires. And when their clients get cancer (or the people around them get cancer), they run down the clock on the lawsuit so they don’t lose any money.

Fuck Tabacco and cigarette companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

performative nonsense which does nothing for kids or their mental health and harms queer kids who lose one of the first places they can find community.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Then it seems there is something other to fix in society than making sure facebook knows anything about that kid.

The Zuckerbergers of the world aren’t the ones to trust with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Then it seems there is something other to fix in society

Yeah that’s why we’re on Lemmy. It’s not perfect but it’s better than zuck, elmo, spez, and pals.

No need for the state to attack kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Now ban it for over 16s

permalink
report
reply
7 points

People should be allowed to do as they please. I think, however, people should be presented with all the potential risks in very clear language if they’re going to, in the same way a pack of cigarettes has a warning, access to social media should present similar disclaimers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You know in the eyes of government, Lemmy is also social media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The difference being you can’t stop a federated protocol. I was being cheeky, but banning or at least regulating algorithm-based social media would do nothing but good for society. User engagement and user safety are directly at odds in a for-profit model.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 158K

    Comments