145 points

The illegitimate Supreme Court brought it back. Don’t forget that Republicans stalled for a year to get one of their Justices, and we have two known perjurers, two that have openly accepted bribes, and an insurrectionist flying fascist flags outside his home.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

There’s no court with authority over the Supreme Court. There’s no systemic means to operationally define their means as illegitimate.

So, if the system is to be preserved, the rules must be respected, and We the People must tolerate corrupt Justices until they choose to resign or die. But, such is intolerable! The system must yield. But, if it ignores its core rules then it deserves no respect!

It’s important that we recognize that various systems are scams and learn how they work. But, often, just like this example, what we find is that the system allows no means of recovery that We the People would find adequate.

They’ll always tell us to be patient, to wait for a more convenient time for change, praying that enough of us don’t reason our way into enough systemic impasses to do more than cast a meaningless ballot. Most of us have very little and trust each other even less. But, sacrificing for our neighbor is the only way forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

The government is allowed to impeach them. Legally speaking.

The right will block such an action though because they too are corrupt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The government is allowed to impeach them. Legally speaking.

Yes.

The right will block such an action though because they too are corrupt.

I encourage ignoring the present day situation for a moment. Instead, think along the lines of systemic design.

If our system exists as a two party system, if one party takes a strong position using whatever legal means, they know the other party will soon also use the tactic in greater magnitude. If they impeach Justices, the vote certainly along party lines, then the composition of Congress changes, and their Justices will surely face impeachment. If one party wisely expands the court leaving room for future expansion, the other party will in the future certainly expand the court to the limit.

Neither party actually needs to fulfill promises to anyone but those that donate money for the propaganda. The propaganda keeps the vast majority from killing all the would-be kings, money lenders, and politicians.

The initial designers of our system predicted that the greatest weakness is the possibility of devolution into a two party system. They thought it’d take much longer than “immediately”.

Coming back to the modern day, and he last several years, I think some protesters said it best:

Fuck Donald Trump and fuck Biden, too! Neither of them give a fuck about you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

You’re not wrong.

And who signs 90% of these apparatchick’s paychecks? It’s the billionaires.

The billionaires are the ones LARPing as the puppeteers. And if we don’t challenge them, their shitty LARPs are uncontested and become real.

The billionaires are the primary beneficiaries of the status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And who signs 90% of these apparatchick’s paychecks? It’s the billionaires.

The billionaires are the ones LARPing as the puppeteers. And if we don’t challenge them, their shitty LARPs are uncontested and become real.

The billionaires are the primary beneficiaries of the status quo.

I feel like you’re anthropomorphizing. The vast majority of the billionaires aren’t human. We deregulated banks with a partial repeal of Glass-Steagall and the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act. And, we continued to strengthen corporate personhood.

Today, the banks are the billionaires that own the stock in the corporations that exercise their right to free speech in campaign donations to puppeteer politicians into making the status quo worse for the vast majority of humans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

You guys need to write a new constitution yesterday. The US constitution is an old relic and it’s hardly surprising it’s so disfunctional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Been saying that for years. It’s been a quarter millennium, how about we get the best and brightest minds from every field of academia, science, philosophy, and yes, even *shudder* religion, to get together and literally hold a constitutional convention? Just toss that old scrap of parchment out and re-write it from scratch, with modern language that is unambiguous and straightforward. If the rights enshrined in the Constitution that we hold so dear to us are actually that important, I’m sure they’ll make the cut for Constitution v2.0. But while we’re in there, we might as well clarify some stuff. Let’s clarify that 14th amendment, let’s define what a “well regulated militia” is, and so on.

Of course, the people in power like the ambiguity. It means that as long as someone somewhere could interpret the constitution in some way that is favorable to them, they can have it mean whatever they want when it suits them and as long as they keep the populace at each other’s throats with an unending culture war they know we’ll never organize enough to change that. It’s a bit of a pessimistic outlook. Our fates are controlled by people who like the dysfunction and that sucks because we could very easily fix a lot of the problems by unifying, but I don’t know if that’s possible at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Thank you for the compliment. But, lucky for us, humanity has much better choices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Pack the court, or order the CIA to assassinate the conservative justices.

Of course neither of these will happen.

Time to get your passports current.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

please do not elect Donald Trump for fuck sakes

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Not really up to a few hundred terminally online liberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Trump is just the current iteration. This is a long term problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And plan. He’s merely a puppet to regain power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Republicans like this right now because it benefits Donald. It’s going to come back and bite them in the ass when it helps their opponents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But they are the disenfranchised and the poor. They have the right to vote for someone who will gut regulations for corporations that will happily increase to looting and pillaging in the quest for profit.

The fact these people reason that it would be better for them with less regulations and oversight is beyond comprehension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Republicans have learned that there are millions of votes on one particular issue that will allow them to do whatever on all other issues. Abortion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You’re assuming reason is involved here. Most of them vote R because that’s how they were brainwashed into voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Most voters who suffered from the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment and the subsequent “controlled explosion” that poisoned the shit out of that area voted to deregulate everything. Trump even went there after the poisoning and did a rally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

You’re assuming a lot: elections, peaceful transfer of power, Congress composition, even the unity of the states is an assumption at this point. If King Trump gets in, many states will refuse to cooperate (if you think this is too wild, many locales and at least one state already refuse to cooperate with ICE, Texas was at one point not cooperating with the Feds on their Southern border). What happens after that is anyone’s guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Democrats love it because is lucrative for donations. It’s a terrible storm of pure evil and ineptitude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

SCOTUS is illegitimate.

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

I know it’s been said as a joke a million times. But it feels like the current POTUS using his immunity for official duties to unilaterally correct this SCOTUS problem that is a flaw overlooked by the founding fathers would be a legitimate, official act that is done with the interest of the country and not for personal gain.

Straight up killing the ones taking bribes and inserting left leaning judges would cause a civil war, and I’m not sure how you can use this immunity situation to correct this problem through policy. Either by creating some sort if oversight, term limits, maybe, since Supreme Court judges are so important they should be elected by the people, not congress, idk. But If immunity to crimes is the hot topic right now, water board them all.

If Biden ordered their assassination he would have my vote and donations to his campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

If Biden assassinates, pardon me, official acts out of existence at least Thomas and Roberts, or better yet all 6 of the servative judges, I promise I will forget for 4 more years that Tim Walz, Marianne Williamson, and Jill Stein even exist. I won’t even mention their names. I will be a Biden-stan for the next 4 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you… Not like Tim Walz? Genuine question, as someone from MN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wait a minute…

Grabs the SCOTUS by the hair and removes the mask revealing them to really be

“King George?!”

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Da da da dat da dat da da da ya da
Da da dat da da ya da!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ka-boom ka-boom

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ruh-roh!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’m gonna start growing veggies. I need to get all the gravel out of my back yard first. I need to spend money to practice at the range, ballistic tubes is the most expensive hobby. Today I’m organizing and helping John Brown breakfast club. What other actionable goals should I focus on to dismantle our newly founded monarchy, comrades?

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

I recommend highly conscious and aware physical fitness, which is to say doing the exercises with full internal awareness of all that’s going on subjectively in your world while performing the exercises.

If you can only do one thing, let it be running. Land on the bowls of your feet while wearing zero offset running shoes (web search “zero offset running shoes”), heels ever so slightly off the ground. Never heel-stomp during running. Relax deeply. Let the belly drop naturally. Consciously slow down your breathing and try to breathe as slowly as possible while running. While running attempt to enter a state similar to sleeping without actually losing awareness. So this here is work for both the body and the mind. Adjust your pace to make running pleasurable and slightly challenging in order to habituate your relationship to running as something you enjoy doing and something you look forward to. Get plenty of recuperation time, don’t run non-stop, take breaks and let the body and mind recover. If you’re older the breaks have to be longer too.

Then if you have more time and energy I recommend body weight exercises including pullups.

If you still have energy left, run with the kettlebells.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is “born to run” by Christopher McDougall running theory right? My knees are kinda bad now so I get most of my aerobic exercise from bicycles now. I should probably find some grass or dirt to run in.

I need to set up a pull bar.

I usually clean and press kettlebells when I’m watching YouTube trash.

Are battle maces worth it? I kinda think just beating a sledgehammer hammer into the ground would be an equivalent range of motion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

This is “born to run” by Christopher McDougall running theory right?

First I hear of this McDougall. I learned everything I typed on my own, painfully, by running in all the wrong ways first. That’s why I was about 42 when I learned how to run.

That said, if McDougall says the same things I say, great! No one should suffer injuries from heel stomping like I had. No one should go through the same hell as I. No one should have to cough up blood from their lungs due to overly rapid breathing, like I had. No one should believe the rate of breathing is a fixed and inborn quality. Instead everyone should know that the rate of breathing is a trainable quality. And the rate of breathing depends on the calmness of one’s deep mind. The calmer the mind, the slower the breathing can be. Hence why I advised to enter a sleep-like state.

I also combined running with meditation and psychoenergetic training (I learned psychoenergetics from Nanci Trivellato and Robert Bruce). That’s basically it in a nutshell.

Are battle maces worth it? I kinda think just beating a sledgehammer hammer into the ground would be an equivalent range of motion.

Don’t know about that, boss.

It probably depends on your goals?

I suggested running first because that one exercise just does waaaaaaay too much benefit in waaaaaay too many areas.

But there are lots of highly specific exercises like partial lifts, finger strength, static exertions, dynamic tension a la Charles Atlas, etc. All depends on your goals and time/energy availability.

What I described will make one tough and resilient like a solder with an endless gas tank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

If you have close friends with similar views make sure they get armed. Make sure they still vote and don’t head down the path of extremism either. Go to your jobs. Make sure you family is still taken care of…

But remember that feeling in the back of your head saying get prepared, and do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Awesome I worked on that today 🤘

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments