133 points

Fun fact, the US gov already has a government efficiency division and it’s called the Government Accountability Office. But I do enjoy the irony of Trump’s government having two efficiency departments.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Ah, so the Department of Redundancy Department…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Also I love that the efficiency department has two leaders. Can’t get more efficient than that

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

“TWO EFFICIENCY DEPARTMENTS ARE MORE EFFICIENT THAN ONLY ONE EFFIECIENCY DEPARTMENT.”

  • Every MAGA Trumper lol
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

You can escape your dash so it doesn’t become a bullet.

- like so

\- you need only add a backslash beforehand.
Same for *other* formatting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

An efficiency department that apparently needs two leaders, as well. Sounds…inefficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t forget: Math is science too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Well that one has “accountability” in the name and Trump hates that word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

In NZ, David Seymour at least axed the old Productivity Commission (which his own ACT party founded) to create his new Ministry for Regulation.

Apparently they didn’t like the answers they got out of the previous version.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Perhaps they kept asking questions that the irritated the PM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Apparently they kept saying things like ‘long-term investment is important and private companies are bad at that’, ‘worker productivity is harmed by poor health and education’, ‘strong urban planning is necessary’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

The acronym of the new department - DOGE - coincides with the name of the cryptocurrency Dogecoin that Musk promotes.

Oh my fucking god

permalink
report
reply
37 points

I cringed so hard that I involuntarily did a kegel

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

this was musk’s play all along, his ‘quid’ to the ‘pro quo’ of spending a couple hundred million of his money to put that shitstain back into power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wonder how long he’s had this name in his head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

At least 2 DMT trips ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The securities fraud is blatant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This mother fucker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

I can’t say 100% of america but 50% of america is actually watching and supporting a 2.0 version of my country 90 years ago.

This is CRAZY. in 100 years no one can say they didn’t know. They were just stupid.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

What is deutschland?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Where the dutch live, duh

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s Pennsylvania.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yep, I’m an American, and also a history enthusiast with a particular interest in the 20th century, and I’m straight up losing my mind watching this happen dude

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Looks like the bribes paid off, musky!

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Who is going to head up the Ministry of Truth, the Ministry of Love, the Ministry of Peace, and the Ministry of Plenty?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

We’ve always been at war with East Asia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought it was Eurasia? Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Puppy Murderer South Dakota bitch is gonna head the Ministry of Internal Peace (Homeland Security).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No, she’s already been tapped to be UN ambassador.

I guess the UN delegates need a laugh too.

EDIT: aw, fuck, that was Stefanik. Well, different joke, same punchline I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, no. Stefanik is awful, but not puppy-killing awful.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments