DONALD TRUMP HAS made no secret of his desire for revenge.

On the campaign trail, he joked about being a dictator on “day one” in office, pledged to jail journalists, and threatened to retaliate against political foes who he felt had wronged him.

Now, just days after he secured a second term in the White House, Congress is already moving to hand a resurgent Trump administration a powerful cudgel that it could wield against ideological opponents in civil society.

Up for a potential fast-track vote next week in the House of Representatives, the Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act, also known as H.R. 9495, would grant the secretary of the Treasury Department unilateral authority to revoke the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit deemed to be a “terrorist supporting organization.”

25 points

Always the plan.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Or concepts of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-114 points
*

He really did go through all that shaming and embattlement. Think of the stress and the assassination attempt. There should be a price paid to the victor when the opponent he overcame would have done to him even more than he already went through. He will bring the fight to the Deep State. Listen to the actual policy decisions.

Just for a couple of examples, tell me you don’t you think that the policy for the IGs to be physically separated from who they are regulating and for Federal institutions to be decentralized from the NW corridor aren’t great ideas in so many ways.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Tell me about the work camps

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

They can’t talk to who they’re regulating and he’s going to break up any coherent structure… and that’s good??

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The wealthy love periods when our economy collapses, it gives them the opportunity to buy all of the assets from everyone down below for pennies on the dollar. Five years later they’ve made 20x what they spent and can sell that back to the poor schmucks for twice what it’s worth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

the Deep State

Please define.

There should be a price paid to the victor when the opponent he overcame would have done to him even more than he already went through.

What the fuck are you talking about.

Think of the stress and the assassination attempt.

You mean by that conservative kid who was acting alone? That assassination attempt?

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

My, my, America is fucked in the head since clearly a sizable number of voting people think like this, while Democrats, liberals and progressives quabble over issues that seem more like worrying whether they are wearing the right color shoes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Democrats, liberals and progressives quabble over issues that seem more like worrying whether they are wearing the right color shoes.

When the entire upper echelon of the national party is content and happy because they’re suckling from the corporate teat that tends to happen. We’ve tried to run pro working class candidates but the national party absolutely loves to rat fuck them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Breaking up the Deep State by having the World’s RICHEST Man who is the CEO of MULTIPLE Businesses with Government Contracts being in Charge of Oversight and Regulation? Like that Deep State?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Then you are not paying attention. Look how the corporate Democrats cozyed up to the neocons and the Cheneys. They really don’t like Trump. The CIA establishment is deep blue. The party switched.

C. Wright Mills https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27993/chapter/211702330

I don’t care if people can’t tolerate different perspectives on the left and feel the compulsion to cast out and silence dissent.

That is genuinely what it looks like to me. I pay attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I pay attention.

Hey, good for you! My dog likes to watch tennis. Could say he PAYS ATTENTION. I wouldn’t say he understands wtf is going on, but attention is being paid…

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Why doesn’t he just use the presidential weather machine against his enemies? Wouldn’t he get the keys to it during transition?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

His sharpie broke

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hey look it’s a terrorist, blocked

permalink
report
parent
reply

Stupidity level: Expert.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

How can they give him anything when he isn’t the president yet?

permalink
report
reply
69 points
*

Because the Republicans control the House. They can start working on bills now and pass them next year.

Bills generally take a while to pass, so getting the work done now means more time for the Don to send his enemies to the gulag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You don’t need control of the House to work on bills that you don’t even intend to pass until the next session of congress, though. There’s nothing stopping the Republicans, Democrats, or even average citizens from writing bills right now that are intended to be voted on by future sessions of congress.

And the House of Reps voting on the bill next week is also meaningless, because the bill has a 0% chance of passing this session with the democrats in control of the senate - and the House of Reps would then have to pass it again once a new session starts. Which, they probably will - but that doesn’t make the vote next week somehow less meaningless. So the headline is pure clickbait: Congress isn’t about to “gift” Trump anything. The gifts will come next year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m waiting for the I started enacting this bill that hasn’t even gone through the legislature yet, with the claims of “I needed to speed up the process”. Similar to the other article someone posted about the Senate not needing to approve cabinet positions because it will save time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

Thanks, abstainers. Really showed us what a great America you lot believe in.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Don’t worry, they’re just thinking long-term. They’ve got a plan to make everything better in 12-16 years, just you wait and see! Any day now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I didn’t abstain, but the blame doesn’t lie entirely with them. This feels like 2016 all over again, down to blaming the voters instead of the party.

People want change and are unhappy with the state of things, so the Democratic Party runs a status quo candidate against a (psychotic liar) who is making promises about change.

At least a charismatic candidate like an Obama (who doesn’t actually rock the status quo boat too much) would have rallied voters. Why is the Democratic Party so bad at this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

None of that is even the beginning of an excuse for going out of your way to burn your own and your neighbor’s house down.

“They should have been 1000x better than the alternative of burning everything, instead of merely 10x better”. This shit just doesn’t fly.

And yes the Democrats are guilty of being better than Republicans by an embarrassingly thin 10x margin. Any decent party is 1000x and that should have happened, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The fault fall on both the DNC and the voters.

The DNC for being god damn awful at campaining and the voters for seeing the situation and still decide not to go vote.

Both can be true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Just as the founding fathers envisioned.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments